Philosophy of the Mind/Theology - Essay Example

A thesis is not a topic or a question. It is a statement that is possibly controversial and requires some argument to establish. For instance, suppose you wanted to attack Socrates’ implied claim that what we take for reality is really just a shadow play compared to the truly real. In that case, your thesis could be: “Socrates’ view that we are constantly deceived about reality is false.” None of the following would be acceptable as theses: “Is Socrates’ skepticism about our knowledge of reality justified or not?

” “This paper is about Socrates’ skepticism about our knowledge of reality.” “I believe (feel, think, am convinced) that Socrates’ view that we are constantly deceived about reality is false.” After you have announced an appropriate thesis at the end of your first paragraph, you should argue in favor of it in the following way. First, spend a paragraph explaining the single most convincing argument in favor of your thesis. Then, spend a paragraph explaining the single most convincing argument against your thesis.

Finally, spend a paragraph explaining why the argument against your thesis does not succeed. Then, write a concluding paragraph claiming that your thesis has been established, and explaining why the thesis is important to you or to the reader. . According to utilitarianism, ethics is not beneficial unless its implemented in real life methodology. An ethical judgment is difficult to make due to the fact that simple rules conflict. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist system as it regards an action as right as long as it benefits the whole society.

Kantian and Utilitarian ethics play a fundamental role in defining the daily aspects of individual decision making through perceptions, actions, and moral outcomes of each theory. The first element that dictates the course of actions taken by an individual is seen through their set of notion of ethics. Utilitarianism ethics argues that suffering, starvation and death from lack of food is detrimental. If one does not take any action to prevent this suffering without being shallow, then according to utilitarian ethics they are wrong.

If one fails to donate to an agency and does not facilitate that process directly himself, they are ethically wrong and at fault. In addition, the concept of Golden Rule is embedded in the utilitarian ethics itself. If one understands the fact that the limit their lavish spending to bare minimum, they can drastically eliminate some of the poverty in society. Consequently, Kantian ethics takes a different approach in this situation. Donating to a charitable organization often is considered a virtuous act.

However, Kant argues that rather than enhancing the condition of the poor, we should focus on ourselves. In essence, it is wrong for an individual to prioritize the conditions of others from the condition of oneself. For instance, if a mother devotes her time helping a charity and does not spend time with her kids; she becomes a victim of depriving herself of the benefits in the future. The