Truth, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder; and just like beauty truth can neither be disputed nor agreed upon by all when the writing style and expression of one's truth is lost in the words one uses.
As expressed above, my argument has been overrun with words, and has taken what I mean to say and hidden it behind metaphor and participles…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "George Orwell's 'Politics and the English Language'"
Download file to see previous pages
Truth, as stated before, is one's own. How can truth be articulated effectively for everyone when we are unable to agree upon what each word means When we are given bits and pieces, sound bites if you will, of life, can we really know what the writer was meaning to convey A Communist pamphlet example in Orwell's essay illustrates this point, "All the 'best people' from the gentlemen's clubs, united in common hatred of Socialism and bestial horror at the rising tide of the mass revolutionary movement, have turned to acts of provocation, to legalize their own destruction of proletarian organizations, and rouse the agitated petty-bourgeoise to chauvinistic fervor on behalf of the fight against the revolutionary way out of the crisis."
While this example is incomplete, the meaning is hidden of what else the writer was trying to say based upon the style of speech he is using. And is this true Have the gentlemen's clubs agitated themselves into a frenzy in order to keep society as it is to keep them comfortable According to this pamphlet, yes; but, the words used make it unbelievable to one who may come across just this passage.
Individual style is constantly in the making, both in writing as well as in thoughts. With the world coming at us at nanoseconds, we are inundated with new ideas, thoughts, and especially words. The world itself is getting smaller, and with that, our vocabulary is getting larger, more international, and confusing. My thoughts are my own, and while trying to convey them with ineffective words whose meaning I may or may not understand, you hear this word and based on your understanding, hear something else and take offense, thereby creating conflict because we have no truth between us, no understanding, and no common ground. We have become schizophrenic trying to keep up with what people are saying.
Even Orwell's essay is used as an example of how we overuse words to convolute our thoughts. We use empty nouns and verbs to explain our thoughts, and our ideas get lost in translation. But it is our truth we are telling, and the words used can either move people or confuse them. Choosing to use one word or many can make that difference. Can I make better sense using this word or that one Shall I use one word or twenty to tell you what I am trying to say
Another example from the essay, is one Orwell uses from Ecclesiastes, "I returned and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all." The meaning is clear with the writer showing us instead of telling us - drawing us a picture instead of using words.
With our truth being personal and subject to perception and translation, our truth is also subjected to new ideas, thoughts, words, and can change. Words change us, as ours can change and influence others, and how we choose to integrate them into our truth will affect how we communicate in the future. Again, with the world closing in, we speak through email, write instant messages, and have shortened what we say for the sake of saving time. What we have actually become is more lazy with each passing day, each email sent, and each quick message to a friend. We use emoticons to express how we
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Fawcett follows Orwell's logic, in saying that political writing greatly affects the development and state of politics. Fawcett defines politics "as the things we do to one another, or allow to be done to us by others through indifference or lust or whatever we've decide is self-interest." In saying so, his definition deviates from the traditional view of politics as involving controls, institutions and power struggles, to a view that implies that our complacency and indifference are the main causes of political subordination and oppression.
To say that a language is reliable is to say the obvious. We all know the potential of language to speak what we have in mind and to speak what we do not have. It is used also to lie, to aver, to adduce, to argue, to propose, to divorce, to lament, to complain, to submit, to harangue, to scold, to woo, to befriend, to accost, to pursue .
The three writers under whose usage of language is under scrutiny in this paper lay critical foundation for the discussion of modern theatre. The importance of language and form in literature and modern theatre lies in the fact that in order to decode a hieroglyph, the only recourse is to know the signs (words) that immediately form another hieroglyph (Zimmerman 2002).
Therefore, it is fundamental to make a critical review of such qualitative research articles in applied linguistics in order to comprehend the vital role of qualitative research methodology in dealing with essential topics in the area. Two of the most illustrious qualitative research articles in applied linguistics are "Learning Words: Large Group Time as a Vocabulary Development Opportunity" by Myae Han , Kathleen Roskos , James Christie , Sonia Mandzuk , Carol Vukelich and "The literacy development of kindergarten English-language learners" by Luisa Araujo.
Julia is one of the key characters in 1984. It stands for the opposite of a "brotherly", anti-sexual, entirely repressed society. At first "sight", or if you read superficially, Julia would seem like a very lighthearted person, a woman who goes with the flow and just cares about having fun and fulfilling her own sexual desires
Sir Orfeo is one of the romances found in this Manuscript. "Sir Orfeo occurs at folios 299 recto to 303 recto in the Auchinleck manuscript, immediately after the romance Sir Tristrem, and followed the Four Foes of Mankind." The text itself might have been composed in the first quarter of the fourteenth century.
The conclusion from this study states that in 1984, Orwell returned to topics he had treated in other works--imperialism, class, poverty, morality, freedom, and language--in the context of a drab future dystopia, a hopelessly wrong society, where the greatest heresy is the expression of common sense.
The conclusion from this study states that Orwell’s 1984 functions as a compelling warning against giving into complete totalitarian control. Even while these satirical dimensions are perhaps the most relevant for modern-day political discourse, the novel also presents a meditation on our epistemological assumptions.
The three major shifts that constitute the major transition in TESOL method since 1991 have been very effective. These are discussed below. First shift is from communicative language teaching (CLT) to task based language teaching (TBLT).
He is an affiliate of the outer party who works in the ministry of the truth. Winston starts to develop critical issues against the judgment dictatorship of the party. He buys a book that he uses as diary as no individual expression is allowed by the party.
4 Pages(1000 words)Book Report/Review
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the book report/review on your topic
"George Orwell's 'Politics and the English Language'"
with a personal 20% discount.