Complete this as a formal analysis ( There should be three paragraphs to this analysis) - Assignment Example

Sur An Analysis of Two Presentations: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly There’s an old saying that the best presentations have three elements: first, a dramatic, attention-getting opening, second, a good summary ending, and third, as little time between the first two as is possible. Unfortunately, too many speakers don’t observe this basic dictum. This short paper is an analysis of two presentations and their elements, the good, the bad, and the ugly. Presentation One is of a life coach by the name of Karen Terry, who is from Austin, Texas.

What Terry lacks in the duration of her experience, she more than makes up for in anecdotes, a very practical asset in her presentations. Throughout her talk, Terry gave excellent anecdotes to give emphasis to her points. She used no graphics which, if added, might have made her presentation better. Presentation Two is one delivered by the noted economist, John Kenneth Galbraith, who addressed a convention several years before he died. It is probably obvious that Galbraith can be forgiven for some of the shortcomings of his talk.

At 92, he displayed some of the characteristics of his advanced age, but these took away only very slightly from his talk. For example, after his presentation was complete, he took questions from the audience. After he finished with each answer, he would step back to the high stool that he sat himself on until the next question was asked. In a way, however, this added to the meaning of his answers, since after each question was asked, he would put his hand to his chin, as if in deep thought, and only after he rose and lumbered to the podium did he answer the question.

This gesture gave emphasis to the thoughtfulness of the answers he was giving to the questions prior to answering He used no graphics in his presentation, but his knowledge of the subject was first-hand and colorful. The anecdotes he used to illustrate his points were first rate. Galbraith’s ability to hold the audience with stories about his experiences with many of today’s most distinguished politicians and economists The 6-foot, 7-inch Galbraith was an avid reciter of dry limericks and pungent, outrageous humor, often at the expense of American society.

Sources Speech Communications.