Preincible of leadership - Essay Example

Type here here Module here here The limitations that the has mentioned are very vague. These can easily be avoided by changing the style and types of questions asked. A good and easy way to avoid misinterpretation of responses is by asking open-ended questions. These questions will enable the research conductor to evaluate the responses and to gauge the leadership performance in terms of what the respondents think about the leadership behavior. The second errors can be avoided by following the proper techniques of research.

Sample bias can be avoided by selecting the right people to ask the questions. Similarly, response bias can be avoided by making sure that respondents are asked questions right after the event while the information is still fresh. Another good avoiding such error is to make respondents note down or evaluate each stage of leadership separately from different aspects. This will enable them to note down the information and will prevent information overload and all of this will avoid all types of bias from the research. 2) Question 1: Is causal relationship always cyclic?

Answer: Causal relationship is not always cyclic and can mislead the researcher if precautions are not taken well in advance. Cyclic complexes can exist in a research, but they can be avoided by defining a dependent and independent variable and conducting the research keeping in mind the nature of the test, and dependent variable that has to be tested. Question 2: What bias can exist in a causal research? Answer: The bias that can exist in a causal research is researcher bias. A research should try to minimize this bias by using proper data analysis programs and other tools that may help him with the research.

Works Cited: Malhotra, Naresh.. “Marketing Research: An applied orientation”. London: Prentice Hall, 2009. Print