John Rawls: A Theory of Justice - Term Paper Example

If you were one of the people given the job of designing a "conception of Justice" for a society in which you would choose to live, what would you expect of that society in terms of fairness and justice? Can you possibly construct an ideal society without factoring in your own special circumstances, such as your gender, race, ethnicity, social status, level of privilege, of level of education? Rawls wants to factor those issues out of the process. Can you do that? Can anyone? If not, can any system of justice be fair?

Given the rare privilege of designing a “conception of justice”, I would profess to weave a justice system that keeps constant recognition of inalienable rights and the utilitarian philosophy of sustaining the majority with the highest advantage. Even though at first it may seem unimaginable or that it would necessarily take ample degree of unpleasant undertaking, the possibility of materializing a utopian society without regard to the impact it bears upon personal concerns proceeds to emerge in the long run since there comes a point when it is inevitable for people to converge at a common end or goal.

The outcome of the conceptualized justice in application should however ensure agreement on base policies that constitute every individual’s freedom in relation to the welfare of the rest of the society. In this fashion, J. Rawls took to account the social contract proposed by Locke as well as the equal allocation of all social primary goods. While the typical odds may direct it to the risks of acquiring a communist profile along with the corresponding disadvantages thereof, American culture has become sufficiently flexible to adopt an ideology patterned after Rawls’ proposition.

If liberty, wealth, opportunity, and confidence have been met in the process such that these good attributes vary in enhanced proportion for one person as well as with the others then the ideal turns into a habitual process toward real circumstances. Take for instance a U.S. nation where every citizen is inclined to get by the latest trends in technology and relevant aspects of industrialization or the modern thinking of wellness by achieving personal satisfaction through continuous individual endeavor, an increase in self-respect is established as a consequence.

With an improved sense of well-being, one chooses to act with freedom that yields a more conscious attachment to the golden rule of acting with liberty yet preserving the value of not causing any potential impedance on anyone’s path. Because a person at this stage is shaped by a justice model aimed at even distribution of resources, one learns the essence of working interdependently so that the desired individual objectives are made capable of casting reflections that affect others in the similar manner.

Hence, even if I consider factoring out situations with gender, race, ethnicity, and other dimensions involving basic human rights and privileges, I am quite confident that the changing nature of occurrences in the community within the current state of globalization would favorably guide the course of governing justice with these terms. By allowing economic progress and further steps with globalization, high probability of fulfilling personal interests while maintaining and holding equivalent respect for those of others may be readily forecasted.

This way, it is easier to project and realize that under such condition, ideal society can exist with a less severe form of justice aligned with the advocacies of J. Rawls.