Free

Compare and contrast disparate treatment and disparate impact - Essay Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
Summary
Compare and Contrast Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact: Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact are two theories under Title VII of the United States Civil Rights Act. Together, they were intended to prohibit discriminatory actions on part of employers toward racial, sexual or class minorities…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93% of users find it useful
Compare and contrast disparate treatment and disparate impact
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Compare and contrast disparate treatment and disparate impact"

Compare and Contrast Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact: Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact are two theories under VII of the United States Civil Rights Act. Together, they were intended to prohibit discriminatory actions on part of employers toward racial, sexual or class minorities. The theory of Disparate Treatment first came into judicial discourse in the Griggs v. Duke Power Co. During and after this case, the term “business necessity” became central to deciding such cases. If business managers treat minorities in a disparate manner in the absence of compelling business needs, then their action can be construed as discriminatory and in violation of provisions under Title VII. In all disparate treatment cases, “whether the issue is the truth or falsity of the employer's reason for its action, or the co-existence of legitimate and illegitimate motives, whether the plaintiff puts on direct or circumstantial evidence, or both, the issue at the liability stage is simply whether the plaintiff has shown, by a preponderance of the evidence, that discrimination was a motivating factor in the employment decision.” (Drachsler, 2005, p.230) The Civil Rights Act of 1991, further extended these provisions and consolidated the list of prohibitions. But the application of Disparate Treatment theory to any given case is never straight-forward, for management decisions are based upon so many factors, with prejudice and discrimination (if any) often playing out in subtle and indirect ways. Judge Magnuson elaborated on 1991 amendments thus: “Absent from the statute is the requirement that discrimination be a "substantial" factor, a "but-for" factor, or the necessary and sufficient cause of the employment decision. Instead, Congress unambiguously required that discrimination be "a" motivating factor in the employment decision. Any analytical paradigm that requires greater proof to prevail on liability contradicts the express language of the statute.” (Drachsler, 2005, p.230) The Disparate Impact theory, on the other hand, holds that “when an action has a disproportionate effect on some group (racial, ethnic, gender, whatever), it can be challenged as illegal discrimination--even if there was no discriminatory intent”. (Clegg, 2000, p.79) To the extent that management's decisions turns out to be unfavorable to a particular group, they are found guilty under this title. As one can see, this theory is highly problematic for business managers, for often, business decisions involve compromise of some sort and it is impossible to please all employees. The flaw in this theory is that it punishes people even when they don't have malevolent intent and pressurizes them into taking politically deliberated decisions, which can prove to be counter-productive to the interests of the organization. Since the 1960s many lawsuits were brought forward by disgruntled employees against their managements under this clause. But as is the general legal consensus, this theory, through its very composition, strongly favors the plaintiff. As a result, most verdicts favor the plaintiffs, irrespective of whether there is a genuine grievance on their part. Interestingly, the popularity of disparate-impact lawsuits in Corporate America, where the concept began, has actually declined since 1991, due to compensation and punitive damages provided under Disparate Treatment laws. But outside the workplace, disparate-impact claims are increasing steadily. Works Cited Barnes, Mario L., and Erwin Chemerinsky. "The Disparate Treatment of Race and Class in Constitutional Jurisprudence." Law and Contemporary Problems 72.4 (2009): 109+. Clegg, Roger. "The Bad Law of "Disparate Impact"." Public Interest Wntr 2000: 79. Drachsler, David A. "Proof of Disparate Treatment under Federal Civil Rights Laws." Labor Law Journal 56.4 (2005): 229+. Gould, Jon B. "Studying Inequality with One Eye: a New Agenda for Evaluating Disparate Treatment in the Courts." Justice System Journal 23.3 (2002): 317+. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Compare and contrast disparate treatment and disparate impact Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/other/1406087-compare-and-contrast-disparate-treatment-and
(Compare and Contrast Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact Essay)
https://studentshare.org/other/1406087-compare-and-contrast-disparate-treatment-and.
“Compare and Contrast Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/other/1406087-compare-and-contrast-disparate-treatment-and.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
li
lindsaybernhard added comment 2 months ago
Student rated this paper as
Wonderful work done on the %topic%. I think it is the best text I have seen so far.

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Compare and contrast disparate treatment and disparate impact

Compare / contrast

...?This is a comparison and contrast between Cinderella and Ashputtle. Both the stories are very similar with only minor differences which will be discussed below. Both the stories essentially follow the same storyline but there are some changes. Charles Perrault’s focuses on the simplicity and kind heartedness of Cinderella who never wishes badly for anyone. Her father is described as a weak individual and is not a prominent character in the story (Perrault). More focus is kept on Cinderella and her fairy Godmother. The Fairy Godmother keeps on telling Cinderella to be a good girl and Cinderella listens to her. Cinderella is shown as a very kind-hearted and innocent girl who always does good to others. Hence in the end Cinderella... her...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

An objective analysis of disparate impact & its effects on age & gender discrimination

...to the members of a protected or minority group (Grover, 1996). Disparate impact can also be said to have occurred on the event that the non-protected groups seem to be favored by a policy than the protected groups, without a clear justification of such an occurrence. Additionally, disparate impact is observed to have occurred, in a situation where there was an alternative avenue that would have been exploited to enhance the equal treatment of the minority/protected members to their non-protected group members, but the avenue was not applied. However, the difference in the research perspectives was that the intentions of protecting against...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Disparate Impact Drug Testing

...a company of this sort of practice. If an accusation of disparate impact is made, and a court finds that the practice does in fact have a negative impact on a protected group of people, then the company is required to prove that their practice "is job related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity." (Runkel, 2008). Should a company be unable to prove the necessity of their practice, then they have unlawfully performed disparate impact discrimination, and they will be reprimanded. Disparate treatment and disparate impact, then, both protected by Title...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Disparate Impact

...requirement in the case of Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Antonio, 490 U.S. Later, the Civil Rights Act of 1991 annulled that part of the Wards Cove decision (HR Guide 2001). Disparate Impact 2 "Disparate impact" is a legal theory for proving unlawful employment discrimination. But in practice, “disparate treatment” theory is practiced. Disparate impact is a thought that some recruitment practices adversely impact a group or community of people than the others. In the example of US Supreme Court Title VII case on the issue of disparate impact,...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

The Recruitment Process of Tanglewood

...Assignment Byline Question 1a The case study defines the 4/5th ratio as a means to calculate the proportional differencesin the hiring of applicants for a specific occupational role (Heneman , Judge, & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2009). In order to determine whether there is discrimination going on in the hiring process, the rate of the minority employment must be below 80 percent. The evidence in this case points to heavy disparate impact discrimination. The Historical Hiring and Promotion Data: Applicant Flow chart illustrates that African Americans are hired in each of these positions at a much lower rate than Caucasians(Heneman , Judge, & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2009). The highest rate for African American employees...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Compare and Contrast Speech treatment of dysarthria

...A Comparative Analysis of Speech Therapies for Dysarthria The dysarthrias form a group of diverse, chronic motor speech disorders (Yorkston, 1996). The disorders of Parkinsons disease, stroke, traumatic brain injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and cerebral palsy should be considered for the reason that these disorders represent significant clinical diagnoses in which dysarthria is a common and devastating symptom. Speech treatment is the usual focus in managing a patient with dysarthria. Keywords: Dysarthria, Speech treatment, motor speech disorder A Comparative Analysis of Speech Therapies for Dysarthria Introduction Dysarthria is a typical symptom of Parkinson’s...
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper

Compare & contrast

...to fill up the gap in our education system and in the workplace Education is very important Ways should be found to get people interested in education Education is one of the most important things in the world today; in fact, it is considered a basic human right by most international organizations. In this paper, we shall look at two articles with different approaches to education and we shall compare these approaches to each other. In this paper, we shall compare the different approaches that these two authors have suggested as a remedy for filling up the gaps in education both in the workplace and at school. We shall look at the following: an approach to education, failures in the education system, and...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Compare & Contrast

..., and utilize male sexual energy as a distraction for what is taking place behind the scenes. Furthermore, the representation of class is one in which the viewer comes to the realization that the moneyed aristocracy/bureaucracy is the only mechanism through which the average societal stakeholder can hope to get ahead. As a direct result of this realization and portrayal, the protagonists of the film find it necessary to ingratiate themselves with these individuals as a means of pursuing this dream. Interestingly, the second film that will be discussed within this comparison and contrast, “All about My Mother”, represents a differential between those individuals that live within the provinces and those that live within...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Compare & contrast

...from the readers. In Chang’s writings, the author does not use sound devices. Thirdly, the use of sensory details and figurative language is another aspect of writing style that can be used to compare and contrast two or more authors. In general, both writers employ literally devices that appeal to the senses of the reader. Both writers extensively use similes in their writings. In Chang’s Lust Caution, examples of similes used include: “…through the glass doors like a sea dragon” (Chang, 28), “what sounded like Hindi upstairs” (Chang, 28) and “a nose squalled like a lion’s muzzle” (Chang, 30) among others. In Hsun’s Medicine, some of the similes used include “the man’s eyes shone…. like a famished...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Affirmative Action v. Quotas, disparate treatment and disparate impact, employment at will

...of people of a given group. The main difference between affirmative action and quotas is that while affirmative action has no set minimum percentages for the representation of a protected group, quotas provide this. This makes quotas easier to monitor considered that the criteria for determining whether or not an institution has complied is predetermined. Question 2 Disparate impact is easier to prove compared to disparate treatment. While disparate impact involves focuses on discriminatory consequences, disparate treatment looks at discriminatory intent. One would, therefore, suppose...
2 Pages(500 words)Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Compare and contrast disparate treatment and disparate impact for FREE!

Contact Us