Download file to see previous pages...
The specifics of these objectives are highlighted under Title II and I respectively. Section one embodies the protection of health covers for workers and their families. This part is meant to ensure easy transfer of health insurance covers from an old employer to a new employer or at least guarantee the continuation of cover in the event of job loss. On the other hand, section II details administrative specifics under Administrative Simplification (AS) (Banks, 2006). The AS section dictates requirements in establishing nationwide standards, which define the manner in which healthcare transactions are conducted electronically. It also defines the specific identifiers for employers, insurance plans and healthcare providers. This section helps simplify administrative challenges emerging from requirements of portability. The AS section also addresses issues of privacy and security of patients’ information and records. Since its ambitious implementation, HIPAA has expanded its influence on to major health issues such as security, confidentiality, privacy and simplification (Banks, 2006). In a nutshell, HIPAA promises an effective and efficient mode of disseminating and sharing electronic information in the healthcare sector. The compliance deadline was 2003 and a slight extension for harmonization of some minor plans. Since 2003, the plan has gained widespread adherence by various players including health insurers, employer sponsored healthcare plans, healthcare service providers and clearing houses in the sector. In spite of its positive outlook and gains made, HIPAA still raises numerous challenges with regard to its implementation. This paper reviews one of the significant challenges in HIPAA’s implementation by highlighting a newspaper article covering the issue of disclosure. The article under highlight appeared in the New York Times on 3rd July, 2007. The piece of work by Jane Gross is titled “Keeping Patients’ Details Private, Even From Kin.” Disclosure Issues in HIPAA’s Implementation HIPAA dictates the rules of disclosure and non-disclosure for Protected Health Information (PHI). However, Gross (2007), indicates that a number of studies have shown that a number of healthcare providers are applying HIPAA inappropriately. These providers and practitioners under them apply the regulations overzealously by being excessively and unnecessarily prohibitive. These acts have left caretakers, family members, law enforcement officers and public health officers unable to access information that is essential for their operations and life. Gross’ article presents this challenge by citing various real-life situations in which family members have been barred from staying with their kin or assessing their treatment chart information while undergoing treatment. Gross cites Mr. Nussbaum’s case in which he was barred from staying with his father or checking his treatment chart as an example of misinterpretation of the act (Gross, 2007). A similar case involving Ms. Banks saw her drive from Oklahoma to Tampa to get information about her mother because this could not be disclosed over the . On arrival, she had to spend another 24 hours before she could get the disclosure from the doctor involved, simply because the nurse feared going against HIPAA (Gross, 2007). These examples show the frustrations that family and other parties such as researchers have when seeking patient information. The bigger challenge is that while there are “good faith nondisclosures,” there are also numerous cases of “bad faith nondisclosures” that unnecessarily bar access to information. For example,
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Privacy Rights Clearinghouse (2011), an online Peer Review Journal on Human Rights related issues sets a broader picture for the rule saying, “HIPAA sets a national standard for accessing and handling medical information”. The Rule came as a requirement from the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.
Administrative Ethics Abstract After finding an issue pertinent to patient confidentiality, the essay aims to achieve the following objectives, to wit: (1) to describe the issue and its effect on the population it affects most, (2) to determine the arguments or facts used in the article to support the proposed solution, (3) to identify the ethical and legal issues reported for the administrative issue, (4) to explain the managerial responsibilities related to administrative ethical issues, and if none were stated, to state what should have been done; and finally, (5) to identify any proposed solutions.
E had earlier completed 2 different advance directives stating the he should not be advanced any life support care and that involved intubation. He had also named his brother, Mr. B, after getting power of attorney form approving him a responsible party in case of he dies.
Human Right and Health, is another course that teaches health workers the relationship between public health and human right, which focus on economic, social, and cultural rights that needs to be addressed while interacting with patients
Hospital and health care centers whether public or private are the next step for the health seekers (patients).
All covered entities must provide access to such records within thirty days (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 1).
Relatively, the patient has the right to examine and get a copy of their health information that is within a “designated record set”
The issues of protection of rights of patients pertinent to ensuring privacy and confidentiality have continued to pervade various health care institutions globally. In the United States, the “Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) addresses patient confidentiality and protects patients and their medical records.
viders to establish national identifiers and standards that allow for electronic transactions on healthcare (Sullivan, American Bar Association, Health Law Section, 2004, p. 83). This study explores HIPAA to demonstrate what the act is all about, how it influences patient’s
“However, when this Act was incepted in 1996, the internet was still in its early stages, and with the evolution of the internet, the Act had to be updated periodically” (Fernald 26). The Secretary of Health and
The use or misuse of the information may affect students negatively. The 1974 Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act seek to maintain privacy of student’s information. The article is useful because it offers information on
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Administrative Ethics-HIPAA for FREE!