The Promotion of Male Marital in the Relationship - Case Study Example

It is an evident fact that communication is very important in a relationship. In such situations, in most cases, it has been observed that men communicate to achieve problem solutions. This is similar to the case of western women but again the percentage is relatively low. Women are more likely to avoid the problem-solving function of communication between both partners. In the chosen case of the marital couple, it becomes easy to understand that the female partner is trying to discuss the issue with aggression (Broughton, 2008).

The case also notes that both partners are trying to set scores with each other which indicates the condition of conflict. It should be noted that if conflict resolution is not undertaken then it can lead up to a complicated crisis between the couple. This is the situation where the Sum Zero concept is introduced which means that one of both parties has to lose it to find out a resolution. This gives lead to other situation where one party can expect a balance of score in any forthcoming conflict (Pappalardo, 1995).

It should also be noted that the case under review is a conversation between a married couple who have an egalitarian manner of relationship in which both partners are empowered but the economic responsibilities of the man make him dominant in the relationship. The female-oriented families (matriarchal couples) are those where a woman’s right must be completely considered supreme. But in this case, it is to be noted that the male’s job is much more important than the woman's because of the limited scope of the job (Hitch & Youatt, 2001).

The conversation between the couple has been noted to be less abusive language. There is no indication of abusive words used at regular intervals showing that the couple is not from a very low socio-economic status. But it would be better to mention that the female partner needs to calm her tone so that the discussion between the couple can be taken easily so that they can find out a solution (Broughton, 2008).

Recommendations:
- It is being suggested that women play an emotional part in a relationship and needs to evaluate communication function. At times, it is better to listen to the other partner when you do not seem to find out about the relationship. In the evaluated case, it can be observed that their male partner suggested she have a new workplace to work in because teaching is a very diverse field of interest. This notes that at least the male partner suggested a solution to the problem rather than just beating about the bush.

- Another situation analysis clause would be to let the other partner win. This does not make one lose it forever. A marital relationship is for life where one win can transform into another loss. This loss is not about property or possession but rather an argument or conflict. This practice is suggested to be solved through a zero-sum strategy.

- The use of power needs to be exercised when the family type is completely understood. Because the couple is an egalitarian marriage bonded, it is suggested to the male partner exercise his power for the need of elaborating the decision-making process to the female partner. And also, the woman partner needs to understand the imperativeness of the job of the man because he is the sole and base responsible end of the relationship in terms of finance.

- Finally, it is suggested that the female partner needs to talk in a calm tone with her husband so that the words are heard and felt at the same time. There is no point in shouting or making sarcastic remarks because this cannot help the couple find out the solution to the problem of moving out and changing their careers. Read More