Torus Fracture at Distal Radius - Essay Example

Torus Fracture at Distal Radius Introduction The Fractures also referred to as buckle fractures, referrers to the partial breakage or the cracking that takes place at the bone shaft. This particular damage gets usually characterized bulging of the cortex that get triggered by trabecular compression form an axial loading force taking place, and the effects impacted along the axis of the bone. They result in bone breaking, at the distal radius, on one side and buckle in an outward direction along the opposite side, cutting partially (Anderson, 2010). For this particular kind of structure, the comparison is usually made to that of a greenstick fracture, which to some extent exhibits the similar characteristics of breakage though it doesn't bow out. In this paper, I am going to make an analysis of torus fracture at distal radius in children, and look at its management by the use of both splint and plaster cast. Analysis The childhood fracture is common and normally occurs after the hand is outstretched (Johnson, 2004). Early assessment needs to focus on recognizing neurovascular compromise, associated injuries, and open fracture. Therefore, radiographic treatment and diagnosis at the injury time is important for proper care. Some of the initial cares include splinting, pain control, and mechanisms aimed to reduce swelling (Morritt, 2014). The torus fractures that are evident at the distal radius are commonly present during childhood but rarely observed in adulthood (Colaris, 2014). Since the children's bones are still undergoing growth and tend to get relatively soft. Due to this reason, among the children, whose bones of their distal radius have high tendency to buckle, most of the fractures will affect the radius mostly at the distal. By this I mean that the bones around the children’s distal radius are soft since they are steal young and relatively weak, therefore they can easily undergo breakage. At times, this particular type of fracture is compared to green stick fractures, or rather a buckle fracture since they get often witnessed in the skin and forearm radius, among many others (Schranz & Fagg, 1992). Fortunately, this type of fracture takes a shorter time to heal since they only require casting and immobilization though it doesn’t demand necessitation for reduction. The victims of this fracture may put cast or splints for between three to four weeks and further taken to X-rays (Mancini, De Maio & Ippolito, 2005). The main purpose of the x-ray is to check whether the bone has healed to the level of expectation before the removal of any immobilizing devices. The treatment duration for The Fracture is usually shorter than that of a greenstick fracture, which demands a casting for six weeks and requires an earlier reduction (LONDON, 2005). The Fracture Types There exist some types of The Fracture based on the fact that they have different degrees of incomplete cracking. Some bones, at the distal radius, can be subjected to breakage, having different tendencies of breakage thereby resulting to complete or incomplete break in the bone (Maharaj, 2008). For this reason, various Fractures are evidenced in the shin, forearm, and of Wrists, among many other parts of the body. Therefore, for one to be sure of the kind of fracture he/she is having the individual is required to check o the signs and symptoms and find out the source of the pain (Hagino, Yamamoto, Teshima, Kishimoto & Nakamura, 1990). The best way forward is to seek for diagnosis from a doctor or visit the X-ray laboratory. The appendix shows the images of torus fracture at distal radius in children, retrieved from https://www.google.com/search?q=images+of+torus+fracture+at+the+distal+radius+in+children&rlz=1C1VSNE_enKE617KE617&espv=2&biw=1366&bih=667&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=JQVyVa_CLa-O7AaWi4DABw&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ#imgrc=lGCRLS0x1J_94M%253A%3BeOroUu7cceUOgM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.orthojournalhms.org%252Fvolume14%252Fimages%252Fjournal2012%252Fhennrikus_figure1.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.orthojournalhms.org%252Fvolume14%252Fresearch%252Fhennrikus.html%3B700%3B414 Symptoms of Torus Fracture at Distal Radius One of the profound symptoms of a torus fracture is severe pain. Severe pain is a common symptom to all other fractures such as tripod structure. Meaning that when bone found at the distal radius breaks, the victim feels a lot of pain that can only be relieved by a strong pain killer. When one breaks a bone around the wrist section, he will experience a lot of pain since it’s the distal radius at this point that has fractured. Apart from severe pain, there is also a possibility of the broken region to be deformed; the broken region becomes distorted (Ladd, 2006). The torus fracture at Distal Radius tends to change its configuration. The change in configuration makes the victim to experience a lot of pain whenever the person touches the injured area. Another symptom swelling around the wounded area. The swelling is normally present around the distal radius (Gunn, 1992). Splint and Plaster Cast Whenever individuals undergo this type of bone fracture, mostly the children, and the best ways of managing them are the use of splint or plaster cast. In major hospitals such as Activities of Daily Living (ADL), the common types of immobilization that influence young ones’ capability of conducting the activities of daily living are the self-fastening splints and plaster casts. This restriction has the tendency to lead to frustrations and consequently non-compliance, as well as impairing the mobility of their wrists (Ashall, 1991). The removable and movable immobilization methods pose a direct effect on the young one’s ADL, as well as undermining their abilities to write, print and having shower among others. Some immobilized children also end up missing some school days. Usually, high satisfaction with the splints that is removable has some extent of attribution to the ability of the caregivers to extract the device, at their wrists, before the children get a shower (Tornetta, 2001). In the studies conducted within major hospitals, most of the parents who take their children for treatment with splints would wish for the same treatment mode if such an accident happens again. Consequently, very few guardians and parents whose children get treated with the cast would opt for the same treatment if the incident emerges again in future. Among those children who get treated with a splint, bathing, showering, writing, drawing and grooming, are significantly easier in comparison to those who get treated with plasts. However for those children treated with the removable splints tends to have more days off school, giving their parents more time off work, as compared to those treated with POP. For those children who request for more time off school usually complain of high pain levels since the injury, and this greatly influences the guardian's choice of the particular treatment method. National Guidelines on Management of Torus Fracture at the Distal Tubule A fall on an outstretched hand is usually the major cause for the torus fracture at the distal radius. When an individual falls on a flexed wrist, the distal fragment is most likely to displace in an anterior direction. The best radiological investigations to be undertaken is to conduct a wrist x-ray test to determine how the bones have been localized. Angulations should be conducted, but the different angulations used should depend on the age of the child, who has accidentally undergone the torus fracture. For the children who are of age six years and below, Bayonet apposition should be undertaken, given that the angulations alignment parameters fits in for the management mode selected (Hjem.iwtm.ru, 2013). As discussed above, this is a common type of fracture that majorly affects the distal radius, and is at times referred to as the Wrist fracture since it mostly affects the distal radius of the wrists. The simplest medication for this kind of fracture is through having rests and rehab since it doesn’t demand an operation to get undertaken. By having rests and rehabs, the cells of the borne cartilage at the distal radius grow, thereby the cartilage reforming ('Acute compartment syndrome in fracture of distal end of radius', 1987). Measurement of Function Some research conducted in most of the medical institutions show that children function well with splints (Tornetta, 2002). Hence, they are later preferred by most of the children’s parents. The reverse is true when it comes to plaster casts, which tend to limit the children’s functionality, thereby getting a lot of rejection from the majority of the parents. Comparing the two different methods of treatment, within a span of three weeks, those children treated with splints tend to have closer to normal function in this span. The others treated with plaster casts, within the same span, are far closer to normal functioning. Nevertheless, a higher percentage of the children treated with cast tend to return fully to their normal activity as compared to those treated with splints. This is due to the differences in the healing and recovering of the of wrists function among the different children undertaken for these two distinct modes (Herzberg, 2013). Flexible Support Bandage The treatment of different structures, particularly for those that are stable, are best improved when elastic support bandage are used instead of the inelastic ones (Jarrett et al., 2007). The torus structures get commonly regarded as stable, and, therefore, the best dressings to be used should be the elastic ones, both for the splints and for the plaster casts. Splints produce better results than casting in comparison to the child’s grip strength, disability as well as stiffness, within a period of five weeks after treatment. Nevertheless, the use of elastic bandage, produce the best results after the period of five months, as compared to both the splinting and casting method (Erler, 2013). Pain For the two different methods of treatment, they tend to exhibit the same levels of pain experienced by the patient. In other words for two different patients who have bone fracture and treated differently by plast and splint, they go through the same level of pain. Under this circumstance, managing torus fracture at the distal radius; splint and plast, the levels of pain experienced by patient diagnosed by the two are almost the same For those patients treated with removable devices, they tend to experience twice-lesser pain than those treated with non-removable devices (Mackay, 1988). Though, those treated with elastic support bandages experiences less pain than those treated with splint and cast. This is because elastic support bandages don't give room for muscular or joint restriction, therefore reducing the mobility and the extent to which patient experiences pain (Lekarz, 2014). Cost of Treatment It is always preferred that all treatments get clinically useful, and this should get based on cost effectiveness, when managing torus fracture at distal radius in children, and other young adults (Solgaard, 1988). This is because most of the clinically useful treatments tend to be the most expensive. According to the research conducted in some medical institutions of the world, it was found that removable splints tend to get more affordable than the plaster cast. With splints, there is a reduction in the need for fracture clinic appointments, attributed with high levels of savings (Kurup, Batra & Nath, 2006). The opposite is true when it comes to reinforcement, whose price is twice, and demands the employment of a plaster technician. Therefore, more parents opt to take their injured children for splints other than plaster casts. This is important because they tend to increase on savings thereby increasing their level of financial standings. Some of the treatment of the fracture include radiograph at an estimated cost of 16 pounds, clinic attendance at an estimated cost of 47 pounds, full plasters of the case at an estimated cost of 5.43, temporary splint at an estimated cost of 2.03 pounds, future splint at an estimated cost of 2.75, and full plaster of the paris backslab at an estimated cost of 1.56. Conclusion Torus fractures at the distal radius are the major fractures evident in children and other young individuals. Under this circumstance, the bones fail to compress since the breakage is at the distal radius. The condition normally occurs at the zone of transition between the lamellar diaphyseal and metaphyseal bone. They are also evident at the distal radius and show no tendency of displacement. The injury is different from other greenstick fracture. Whenever we put into consideration on the two treatment modes on ADL, the duration of return function, follow up demand and cost effectiveness among others, splinting is the most preferred. Despite these, there are also some benefits that get accompanied by plaster casts as compared to patients taken for splinting. Research has also shown that there is less significance difference between those children with splint as compared to those with plaster casts through the use of elastic support bandages has relatively lower pain than both of them. Finally in my paper, I recommend the use of splints, since they have clear guidelines on the parents’ usage and treatment stoppage, in the process of managing the torus fractures at distal radius in children. Torus fractures at the distal radius is a common injury among children and constitutes a wider section of the fracture clinic workload. According to statistics there are more than 260 cases annually with highest cases recorded during the summer season (Herzberg, 2013). Additionally, there is a wider variation in a manner in which the injury is mitigated and treated. This particular damage gets usually characterized bulging of the cortex that get triggered by trabecular compression form an axial loading force taking place, and the effects impacted along the axis of the bone. Since the children's bones are still undergoing growth and tend to get relatively soft. Especially for the torus fracture at the distal radius, one can detect a slight change in the configuration, and experiencing a lot of pain whenever the person touches the injured area. Bibliography Acute compartment syndrome in fracture of distal end of radius. (1987). Injury, 18(5), pp364. Anderson, R. (2010). Paediatric cardiology. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier. Ashall, G. (1991). Flexor pollicis longus rupture after fracture of the distal radius. Injury, 22(2), pp.153-155 Colaris, J. (2014). Forearm Fractures in Children. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam. Erler, A. (2013). ADHD and stimulant drug treatment: what can the children teach us?. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(6), pp.357-358. Gunn, A. (1992). Undisplaced fractures of the distal third of the radius in children: an innocent fracture?. Injury, 23(6), pp.427. Hagino, H., Yamamoto, K., Teshima, R., Kishimoto, H., & Nakamura, T. (1990). Fracture incidence and bone mineral density of the distal radius in Japanese children. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,109(5), pp.262-264. Herzberg, G. (2013). Acute Distal Radius Fracture: PAF Analysis. Jnl Wrist Surg, 02(01), pp.095-096. Hjem.iwtm.ru,. (2013). Retrieved 8 June 2015, from http://hjem.iwtm.ru/buckle-fracture-guidelines/ Jarrett, D., Sedlak, R., Dickerson, W. and Reeves, G. (2007). Medical treatment of radiation injuries—Current US status. Radiation Measurements, 42(6-7), pp.1063-1074. Johnson, M. (2004). Safeguarding children and the future of the nursing and midwifery council.Nurse Education Today, 24(4), 245-247. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2004.03.006 Kurup, H., Batra, S., and Nath, P. (2006). Distal radius fracture and compartment syndrome.Injury, 37(10), pp.1026. Ladd, A. (2006). Displaced Fracture of the Distal Radius in Children: Factors Responsible for Redisplacement After Closed Reduction. Yearbook Of Hand And Upper Limb Surgery, 2006, pp.125-126. Lekarz, A. (2014). Distal radius fracture: Cinderella of the Osteoporotic Fractures. Orthopedic & Muscular System, pp.03(03) LONDON, R. (2005). A Twist on Dual Diagnosis. Clinical Psychiatry News, 33(1), p.30. Mackay, R. (1988). Terminating life-sustaining treatment--recent US developments. Journal of Medical Ethics, 14(3), pp.135-139. Maharaj, D. (2008). A twist in diagnosis. International Journal of Surgery, 6(6), pp.493-494. Mancini, F., De Maio, F., & Ippolito, E. (2005). Pisiform bone fracture–dislocation and distal radius physeal fracture in two children. Journal Of Pediatric Orthopaedics B, 14(4), pp.303-306 Morritt, G. (2014). Does the Nursing and Midwifery Council need four London bases?. Nursing Standard, 29(14), 34-35. doi:10.7748/ns.29.14.34.s42 Schranz, P., and Fagg, P. (1992). Undisplaced fractures of the distal third of the radius in children: an innocent fracture?. Injury, 23(3), 165-167. Solgaard, S. (1988). Function after distal radius fracture. Acta Orthop, 59(1), pp.39-42. Tornetta, P. (2001). IntraarticularDistal Radius Fracture. Journal Of Orthopaedic Trauma, 15(6), 453-454. Tornetta, P. (2002). Distal Radius Fracture. Journal Of Orthopaedic Trauma, 16(8), pp.608-611. Appendix: Read More