Interview on ethical dilemma part 2 - Essay Example

Interview on Assisted Euthanasia Interview on Assisted Euthanasia Euthanasia is a critical that affects people differently. There are contradicting views regarding the application of Euthanasia and its impacts on society. I interviewed a neighbor to seek her opinion regarding assisted euthanasia. Parker is a 42 years old teacher. She is a firm believer that the sanctity of life should be maintained at all levels and situations. She believes that there is no situation that justifies inducing death to a patient, regardless of whether the patient has consented.

Parker is a devoted Christian. She uses the religious teachings and beliefs to draw her conclusions regarding Euthanasia. She asserts that the Bible does not allow any form of human interference with human life. As such, death should not be voluntary or induced. The autonomy of a patient to choose his or her destiny as far as health is concerned fails to consider other interested factions. Thus, patients cannot decide to end their lives since repercussion run deep within the society.Euthanasia leads to wider social problems and introduces discomfort within a society.

Families break due to differences in opinions regarding euthanasia. Family members of patients are required to consent to the move before it is done. In many instances, there is hardly consensus and only the decision of the patient and the majority of family members prevails. As such, the decisions leave a broken family. She further claims that different views in a family may result in depression and other health related problems.Parker accepts that patients have autonomy over their lives. She also accepts that there are many complex situations where patients suffer and have little chance of survival.

However, there is no clear method to determine when to die, and whether a patient has the right to decide to stay alive or die. Some patients, especially parents or older siblings, are relied upon by children and other dependents for survival. As such, their decisions and actions directly affect others. It is important to stay alive since it gives hope to the dependents of possible healing. Ending the life of such individuals makes people lose focus and hope in life.Allowing people to decide their fate erodes the societal perception towards life.

Society regards life as precious and supposed to be preserved at all times. Assisting people to take life communicates a wrong message to the society. Thus, it is imperative to treat the patient until he or she dies out of the severity of illness rather than assisting them to take their life. Doing so would strengthen the doctrine of the sanctity of life.Parker believes that nurses should invoke their ethical principles, social values and the professional code of conduct when dealing with euthanasia situations.

The ethical principles demand that nurses act to the interest of the health of the patient. In addition, nurses are supposed to ensure that their presence benefits a patient. Thus, it is against these principles to participate in actions that cause obvious harm to the health of a patient.