Management of Risk and Protection of Vulnerable Individuals in Health and Social Care - Report Example

Management of risk and protection of vulnerable individuals in Health and social care In recent years, the health sector has recorded serious incidents demonstrating the essence of establishing immediate action in ensuring that vulnerable persons at risk of abuse and neglect receive support and protection. Governments are giving more priority towards actions while perceiving local statutory agencies among other relevant agencies to be critical partners in establishing actions taken as needed. The guidance is built on Government’s perception of results and human rights from the firm intentions of closing significant gaps in the delivery of the rights along honoring the Human Rights Act. This paper gives a brief overview of risk and protection of vulnerable individuals. The essay also outlines the principles of good practice and strategies to protect individuals. The paper concludes with proposals for appropriate organizational policies and procedures. The goal has shifted to creating frameworks for action upon which the responsible agencies are called to work in consultations to assure coherent policies in protecting vulnerable persons from risks of abuse as well as effective and consistent responses from circumstances ascertained from concerns of formal complaints and anxiety expressions (Heaslip and Ryden 65). The primary aim of agencies includes preventing abuse in areas possible and establishing preventive strategy progression. Agencies require an assurance that there are robust procedures in place to deal with any incident of abuse. Circumstances for which exploitation and harm occurs is popular for the extreme diversity and membership of at-risk groups. The problematic issue is the identification of subsequent steps in making responses to such diversity (Young 121). The healthcare policies ascertain that service availability and existence of illness symptoms is substantiated in explaining the application of services. Services can be availed even without the use and may be utilized in a manner that is not established in the performance (Larkin 87). People can seek the help of various problems above others without seeking help from the reflection of intended services provision. Scoping reports identify mismatches between patients’ needs and professional expectations to the service uptake patterns. The description of problems for the delay, as well as non-uptake for health services, appears to have a link to the underlying social deprivation structures and specific membership for cultural groups (Leathard, Goodinson-McLaren and McLaren 87). The problems of the apparent over-utilization and inappropriate application are an important healthcare consideration. There are distinct forms of explanations in help-seeking. Individualistic approaches are established by social-psychological research that focuses on attributes of individuals and cognitive processes underlying decision-making. Social barrier techniques focus on situational and social forces such as economic factors, knowledge, medical and organizational care factors, beliefs and roles functioning as prompts or delay agents to help-seeking. One of the recommendations is that information resources the capture illness through the available channels accessible to vulnerable people. This will allow them to find and use elements of acceptance in diagnosing educational interventions and the likelihood of only having limited impacts to alteration of the behavior only for specified conditions. Health care officials need to use simplistic assumptions about ‘deficits’ among vulnerable people’s knowledge to avoid misunderstandings. Potential of interventions targeting promotion develops an appropriate help-seeking approach among discouraged groups. Help-seeking behavior is advanced through the imposition of moral character for using health services and improving recognition (Adams 434). The organizational forms proliferation within the scope allows for needs management with careful avoidance of risks for candidacy. High non-attendance levels at services can be treated as one indicator of low permeability. Services that are difficult for vulnerable people to use should be addressed. Services can assess the levels to which social, gender, age, or ethnic patterns non-attendance while investigating the probable application of qualitative methods (Heaslip and Ryden 43). Services should establish the manner in which working with people pertains to working with resources needed for mobilizing use and comfort among people feeling of used services. The achieved from audits are engaged by users while asked of transport, childcare and workplace arrangements triggered with arrangements in the language or accompaniment (Riegelman 90). Health care services are offering preventive, and health maintaining care should evaluate the way in which they place to make themselves most congruent with the ways in which the potentially vulnerable groups use health care. Practitioners require a reflexive attitude toward engaging critical self-reflection. The approach is explicit on issues of responding to presentations while making adjudications on people. It is important to identify heuristics and rules of thumb used in assessing the eligibility of vulnerable people for certain services. It is important to make a recognition of team-based aspects of the decision-making processes while understanding contributions that team members make and how patients’ view and incorporation of the negotiations (Adams 65). The equity impact of the evidence-based guidelines for the management of health conditions can be assessed. The debate about specialized services should form the basis for particular groups having unresolved proprieties. The evaluation of specialized services should pay careful focus on unwanted effects among the specialized services (Young 98). There are healthcare risks that organizational features from health concerns impair access by ethnic minority populations. The cultural dissonance is discord between cultural health care norms for organizations while imagining ideal users (Heaslip and Ryden 65). The focus creates suggestions on low permeability. Minority Ethnicity people may be alienated from healthcare organizations while appearing to make stereotypes about lack of sensitivity. However, the direct interactions evidence minority usage between providers and permissible formulation. Provision of extensive language and the interpretation of services allow for patchy and variable causes in extreme difficulty among people with language difficulties. The aspects of candidacy are subject to organizational turbulences as well as fragmented boundaries that pose considerable challenges. In extreme case, there are drains on resources that are based on the problems from the newness (Riegelman 87). For minority ethnicity people, the negotiation of points of entry for health services as well as sustainability of engagement requires more work in the mobilization of resources (Larkin 98). The minority groups lack knowledge for the existence of services while using them to advance information of services that are not availed in formats that are understandable. Knowledge of the specific conditions can be poor making the recognition of such symptoms difficult, and the approach to help-seeking becomes adversely influenced. The people from different ethnicities lay membership and beliefs of certain social networks influencing their help-seeking behavior. This causes delays in the approaches to help-seeking within conditions of stigmatizing nature (Leathard, Goodinson-McLaren and McLaren 89). Access to viewable channels of social support for all ethnicities is one of the critical components of help-seeking while there is particular relevance to members from minority populations and interpretation. Reluctance to using family members, as well as children in interpretation, could deter help-seeking. The social network forms may deter help-seeking in sensitive problems and creation of gossip grapevines. People who are recent migrants face such difficulties. Healthcare firms rely on the implicit application of ‘ideal users’ who are in a position of matching precise competencies and resources sets to the major services aimed at providers’ use. The preferences and choices tally with the manner in which health care services are delivered and organized. Sustainability of healthcare engagement is attached to difficult situations as there is a need to traverse boundaries of healthcare firms. The boundaries are created through complex organizational configurations as well as alternative forms of provision. This results in the difficulties and fragmentation of coordination. Works across boundaries require that changes from a given part of the system have subsequent effects on the parts (Adams 87). The manner in which persons are disposed of and categorized in respective interactions for health services impact critical influences on in-system access. Service provision aspects interact with help-seeking behavior as well as service in addressing intensified access problems. The appearance of health services among vulnerable people makes a fundamental claim to their candidacy to achieve medical intervention or attention. On the other hand, the ability to make presentations allows the levels of readiness to face appropriate assessment through variable and extended concerns (Young 87). People with socio-economically disadvantaged lack skills of convincing health professionals demonstrate candidacy of their claim’s legitimacy and authenticity. This also shows that they can convert health care processes to reap more health benefits. The focus concerns the approach to which adjudications are focused on by the health professionals with reference to routine solutions to problems, people’s interests, and scope of options involved in addressing health needs. The approach deals with disadvantaged and other deprived people. The deprived people are judged on poorer candidates and technical eligibility grounds because of the co-morbidities and health behaviors including smoking (Heaslip and Ryden 78). The fragmentary, as well as strong evidence, shows that elements of moral and social candidacy are seen to be less deserving. Individuals continue negotiating and controlling the focus and definition of candidacy while advancing consequences. Therefore, it allows for declined offers placed forth by health services and with an important access aspect for the relative and diversified study. Abuse incidents include multiple calculations while persons continue advancing relationships and service contexts along the stated health care needs. The concept makes relevance in looking beyond the incidents and breaches of standards that are underlying patterns and dynamics of harm. The abuse instances constitute criminal offenses (Riegelman 109). For such case, the vulnerable adults have an entitlement to the protection of the law through similar lines as others members of the public. Additionally, statutory offenses are created through specific protection of persons without the capacity of the distinct perspectives. Illustrations of actions may include criminal offenses with an assault on physical or psychological as well as sexual assault among other financial exploitation forms (Adams 89). The forms of discrimination range between racial and gender foundations. The alleged criminal offenses are different from the alternative non-criminal abuse forms as the responsibilities for initiated action has invariable discretion to the state through the police and private prosecutions. The element allows for the theoretical possibility with an exceptional practice. Further, complaints on the alleged abuse are pointers to criminal offenses having a commitment to imperative reference to the police for matters of urgency. The placements of care settings, personnel link theories of balance taught in literature to their professional practice. While progress in the service, healthcare recognizes the positive influence on social care practice while developing reflective practice skills. The vulnerable people lack an understanding of the significance involved in ensuring that people have more professional boundaries established. The systems gain the understanding that there is the relevance of principles and values through which social and health care practice is based (Leathard, Goodinson-McLaren and McLaren 90). Vital concepts of values and principles include support planning while ensuring that the individual needs have been planned for while resources are mobilized. Some of the supports planning processes allow persons to gain the understanding the ethical as well as legal boundaries involved in taking care of vulnerable people. Research is important in the scope of vulnerable candidacy issues. The areas of concern include whether amounts of working people is based on using health services in a systematic manner between different groups (Larkin 90). The approach allows for practitioners to make categorizations and judgments of healthcare eligibility for people. Whether there is evidence-based Association for the disadvantaged groups, there is a specification for eligibility in criteria. The exploration of acceptance for patients offering practitioner practice is different between different groups. Research on impacts to dedicated services and service evaluations are important in achieving anti-discrimination interventions. In conclusion, care and support provision should be customized to address needs of an individual while encouraging them to achieve what is possible for their selves. This is one of the particular aspects providing social care and applying people’s interests in receiving healthcare in the longer-term. In the assessment of needs for care and support for vulnerable individuals, daily activities can be identified through a beneficial arrangement that puts them at similar levels of risk. The concept calls for balanced decisions made between needs, dignity, and freedom of safety and individuals. Care assessments can enable vulnerable people’s live longer and fulfilled lives. However, this includes mechanisms for the restriction of reasonable freedoms. The care providers encounter difficulties in slipping towards risk adverse approaches among multitudes of reasons. For example, there are hurdles with bad experiences, resources, and fear of consequences of complications. Works Cited Adams, Richards. Foundations of Health and Social care. Basing stoke: Pal grave Macmillan. 2007. Print Heaslip, Vanessa., and Ryden, Julie. Understanding Vulnerability: A Nursing and Healthcare Approach. New York: Wiley, 2013. Print Larkin, Mary. Vulnerable Groups in Health and Social Care. New York: SAGE, 2009. Print Leathard, Audrey., Goodinson-McLaren, Susan., and McLaren, Susan. Ethics: Contemporary Challenges in Health and Social Care. New York: Policy Press, 2007. Print Riegelman, Richard. Public Health 101: Healthy People--healthy Populations. New York: Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2009. Print Young, Staci. Avoiding the Waterfall: Health Care Advocacy for Vulnerable Populations in an Urban Community. New York: ProQuest, 2007. Print Read More