Diagnostic Reasoning - Essay Example

Diagnostic Reasoning Medical decision-making models focus on analytical reasoning. In order to come up with superior diagnostic and curative decisions, the models utilize Bayes’ theorem, thresholds and decision trees. These arithmetical models integrate medical epidemiological data. They are also associated with evidence-based medicine and standard for superior practice. The conclusive statement made in the article that medical decision-making doctors have to establish a balance between diagnostic reasoning and a kind of intuitive appraisal is true.

The use of diagnostic methods alone does not always guarantee the expected results. Even though clinicians can use data from patient’s signs and symptoms to improve previous probabilities, they do not compute a running score of probability ratios. Their evaluation of previous probabilities depends on their understanding of patients and their expertise. They also add proof to a previous chance instead of multiplying proof by a previous probability (Stolper, Van de Wiel, Van Royen, Van Bokhoven, Van der Weijden & Dinant, 2011).

In as much as the strength of an analytical indicator to substantiate or reject is mostly evaluated in various terms including irrelevant, weak, and strong, clinicians often use their projected decision threshold before taking actions. Since this has not always provided positive outcome, it is necessary for the medical decision-making clinicians to establish a balance between diagnostic reasoning and a kind of intuitive appraisal. Diagnostic reasoning is applied in complicated cases like testing hypothesis and purposeful verification.

Therefore, general practitioners will have to depend on a kind of intuitive assessment by listing patient features, establishing their weights and matching them with the symptoms related to a particular illness. In conclusion, it is necessary to establish a balance between diagnostic reasoning and a kind of intuitive appraisal. The process allows doctors to come up with a conclusive decision concerning a particular infection.ReferencesStolper, E., Van de Wiel, M., Van Royen, P., Van Bokhoven, M.

, Van der Weijden, T., & Dinant, G. J. (2011). Gut feelings as a third track in general practitioners’ diagnostic reasoning. Journal of general internal medicine, 26(2), 197-203.