Critique of Systematic Research Review (SRR) - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
This paper "Critique of Systematic Research Review" discusses a particular nursing research on the ability of today’s nurses to pinpoint real and likely health issues in their patients, construct plans that hinder or alleviate these issues, and eventually assess the results of their caregiving. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96% of users find it useful
Critique of Systematic Research Review (SRR)
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Critique of Systematic Research Review (SRR)"

Critique of Systematic Research Review (SRR) Critique of Systematic Research Review (SRR) Relevance of the Nursing Research Problem Addressed In A SRR to Practice
Hospitals expect today’s nurse to meet numerous goals that cater to everybody. Nurses ought to demonstrate competency, critical thinking, and kindness. The expectations of today’s nurses are the most relevant in SRR to practice, as stated in Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt’s review (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2011). The review is correct about the ability of today’s nurses to pinpoint real and likely health issues in their patients, construct plans that hinder or alleviate these issues, and eventually assess the results of their caregiving. All these responsibilities take place in a time-based and quickly changing environment that frequently only tolerates speed for consideration.
Critique of the Levels of Evidence of the Studies Used in the SRR, Specifically the Designs of the Studies Included
Levels of evidence explored in Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt’s SRR vary in research designs of the literature used. The SRR utilized evidence from research articles and books. First, reliable applications of evidence-based practices in healthcare frameworks formed a level of evidence. Nurses in Magnet organizations reported these applications in higher levels. Magnet organizations were the designs of the first research works used by Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2011). Second, the accessibility of professionals of evidence-based practices was proof of the SRR’s viability. Third, organizational cultures that supported evidence-based practices were proof of the SRR’s flexibility and comprehensiveness. In addition, there were no substantial differences in items associated with the requirements and access to sustenance of evidence-based practices.
Critique of the Clarity with Which the Studies are Presented and Critiqued
The clarity that Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt use to present and critique the studies in the SRR is exceptional (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2011). The researchers provide a discussion of the variances between research designs of study application and models of evidence-based practices. Both ideological variances, as well as the variances in physician competencies required and critiqued. Study models of evidence-based practices used by the writers are debated in differing levels of detail. For instance, Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt discuss the Iowa Model, Larrabees model, and Kitsons model differently.
Description of the Overall Findings of the Studies, As Summarized In the SRR
Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt discussed the overall results of the studies in terms of implication. According to Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, the findings affected nursing managers, leaders, health care managers, trainers, and academics differently (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2011). This is because these professions are crucial for developing a helpful tradition for evidence-based practices. Out of this complicated world of nursing is the problem of meeting these expectations using care revolving around effective and dependable scientific proof. This way, nursing can slowly convert into an overall evidence-based profession.
Critique of the Conclusions of the SRR, With Implications for Your Current Practice and Future Research
The SRR’s conclusion betters the quality of evidence-based practices in relation to healthcare expenditure and patient outcomes. The conclusion mostly stressed the importance of the studies’ findings, offering the time, academic competencies, developing sessions, and resources that staff nurses require the application of evidence-based care (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2011). Parts of the conclusion that debate the SRR, the implementation, and distribution of proof are possibly the most helpful in the SRR. This is because they allow nurses to begin reflecting on and attempting to apply evidence-based practices.
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2011). Evidence-based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare (Second Ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Critique of Systematic Research Review (SRR) Assignment”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Critique of Systematic Research Review (SRR) Assignment)
“Critique of Systematic Research Review (SRR) Assignment”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Critique of Systematic Research Review (SRR)

Research critique

...? Introduction The paper under critique in this appraisal is d “All they said was my kidneys were dead Indigenous Australian patients’ understanding of their chronic kidney disease. The model of critique used for this paper is known as COREQ. It is a 32-item checklist model. The items are grouped into three main domains namely; research team and reflexivity, study design, and data analysis and reporting (Tong A, 2007). This method has been developed following the complexities associated with reporting fundamental aspects of qualitative researches. Prior to its development, only partial checklists were available for qualitative researches. Other methods,...
12 Pages(3000 words)Research Paper

Systematic Review Paper

...? Systematic Review Paper of Systematic Review Paper The article, “The systematicreview of literature: Synthesizing evidence for practice” by Lynn Rew is aimed at describing the process of conducting a systematic review of literature to help nursing practitioners in making research findings that are clinically sound and methodologically sound. It seeks to provide the description of the literature process of systematic reviews, including its rationale, attributes for doing such reviews, as well as provide step-by-step directions for doing a systematic review (Rew, 2011). In addition, the article has discussed the practice implications of application of systematic review in nursing and pediatric nursing in particular. The article... ...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Systematic Literature review

...conducted a systematic research interview to investigate the different perception of IT managers on safety, performance, and non-functional security requirements of a software system. Basically, “systematic review is a specific methodology that locates existing studies, selects and evaluates contributions, analyses, and synthesizes data, and reports the evidence” in a clear manner (Denyer and Tranfield, 2009, p. 671). In line with this, Rousseau et al. (2008) further explained that “systematic means comprehensive accumulation, transparent analysis, and reflective interpretation of all empirical studies pertinent to a specific question” [cited in Booth,...
16 Pages(4000 words)Literature review

Systematic Literature Review

...focusses on the problem of the patient and the action that the therapist takes to help the patient. OBJECTIVE/S OF THE REVIEW Researchers’ studies and journals, on cognitive behavioral therapy, uses patients with mental disorder in order to express and draw conclusions on the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy on the patients with disorder. I will base my article on their research and show how effective cognitive behavioral therapy has been to patients with disorders. SEARCH STRATEGY I used two types of databases: Informit and Eric. To perform the search I had to use some terms that would lead me to the databases. The first was key words I used were ‘Cognitive behavioural...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Systematic Review and Synthesis

...Induced Hypothermia Introduction Patients continue to be affected by heart related problems. In particular, cardiac arrest has been a major challenge to most individuals. Cardiac arrest refers to stopped mechanical activity of the heart thus leading to stopped blood flow. Medical interventions have been applied in pre-hospital care to help cardiac arrest patients achieve normal operation of their circulatory system. This paper looks at the various researches that have been conducted in assessing the importance of therapeutic hypothermia in providing care to cardiac arrest patients. Study, Authors, Date Type of study Sample Design and method Results conclusion Therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest implementation in...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Systematic review for informed consent

...2.2.2 Limitation of systematic reviews There have been noticeable improvements and beneficial effects by systematic reviews in terms of minimizing biasness and errors in studies, which in turn has resulted in increased reliability of the results and outcomes; however there are still limitations that surround this method. The procedure requires certain qualifications which should be under scrutiny. Petticrew & Roberts (2006) illustrated that there is a possibility for professionals and expert researchers to make errors, regardless of their magnitude, which may affect the results on a certain study. Based on these factors every systemic...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Systematic review critique

...which are aimed at optimizing the care of patients which are called clinical practice guidelines. These guidelines are supposed to be guided by systematically reviewed evidence and an assessment of harms and benefits of all the alternative options for the care of patients. Rather than offering a one –size-fits-all kind of approach for the care of patient practice guidelines should in theory give an evaluation in terms of quality and precise scientific literature arrived at through extensive research and assessment of the possible harms and benefits of any particular treatment. This kind of information is supposed to enable the providers of health care to continue correctly in the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Systematic review and metaanalysis

...of a table gave the foundation of today’s systematic reviews and meta-analysis. As such Karl Pearson was the first to analyze clinical trials outcomes using meta-analysis. Other individuals that participated in the development of meta-analysis were British Statistician Ronald Fischer and his colleague William Cochran who also conducted analysis from trial results at the agricultural Research station in Rothamstead dated back in 1930s. The term meta-analysis was coined by Gene Glass in 1976 referring to it as the statistical analysis of large collection of analysis results from entity studies for the intention of integrating results (ORourke, 2007). The application of meta-analysis has...
15 Pages(3750 words)Thesis

Critique of Systemic Research Review (SRR): Preventing Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia in The Acute Care Setting

...Preventing Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia in the Acute Care Setting Systematic Research Review Introduction Pneumonia refers to inflammation that occurs at the lungs due to irritation by chemical substance, bacteria, virus, fungi or an aspirate. Pneumonia can either be community acquired or nosocomial in nature. In the hospital setting, patients can be able to get pneumonia from nosocomial infections, mechanical ventilators or during aspirations in anesthesia. Quite a number of studies have been on going in regard to ventilator acquired pneumonia which is commonly due to aspiration. In a research conducted by Methenyl et al (2010) to find out whether elevation of the head...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Systematic Review

...Management Systematic Review Question What is the general area in which you wish to conduct research? Research Question: How does ethical leadership influence employee voice in non-profit organizations in America? Structure a) Context/ The employees: Employees in non-profit organizations in America who are under the supervision of the manager. b) The Interventions: Ethical leadership style compared with other styles of leadership in non-profit organizations in America. c) Study Mechanisms: Comparative studies of any study mechanisms examining if leaders in different non-profit organizations in America behave in an ethical manner and their influence on employee freedom. d) The outcome: Employee creativity is an outcome of employees... in...
1 Pages(250 words)Article
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic Critique of Systematic Research Review (SRR) for FREE!

Contact Us