Download file to see previous pages...
e status of vasectomy via interviews; most of the interviews involved telephoning, administration of questionnaires, the use of the healthcare centres registries, as well as the physical interview by nurses. Among the participants of the research included patients that had experienced the vas deferens’ surgical operation. In order to control the cases study various controls were taken into account; these included individuals that were diagnosed with skin and lung cancer. Other conditions such as digestive disorders and rehabilitation problems, as well as the neighbours of the patients were also treated as the controls of the case study (Bernal, Latour and Gomez, 2012).
However, as regards they made decisions regarding the relevance of the primary studies, Bernal, Latour and Gomez (2012) do not point out the modality of selecting the papers for a review. The quality of the methodology was evaluated by taking into consideration a number of threats that are likely to be absent or present with respect to the validity. Among the threats included misclassifying of a disease and inadequacy of selecting the controls. Bernal, Latour and Gomez (2012) carried out an observation on a population of 221,238. Out of this population, 14,334 were categorized under case-control studies, while 206,904 fell under the cohort studies; there were nine case-control studies, and five cohort studies.
Following the research, Bernal, Latour and Gomez (2012) claimed that the experimental evidence that was attained regarding the relationship between prostate cancer and vasectomy was characterized by a low level of quality. It was identified that there are several biases with respect to the sources; the sources attempted to overestimate the effect of vasectomy. In this respect, the evidence that was experienced does not advocate for a change in the family planning; this is due to lack of justified evidence. Similarly, the evidence does not indicate whether individuals who have experienced
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) in nursing is founded on the principle that the quality of healthcare in institutions, patient service in hospitals, and emergency preparedness of nursing staff are all increased when the individuals providing the healthcare services are well informed with the latest medical research.
The evidence would be the best available clinical evidence for safe patient care. Polit and Beck defined research as “the systematic enquiry using disciplined methods to answer questions or solve problems” ((2008). The aim was to develop a research from the evidence provided in previous research, refine it to selected situations and expand the body of knowledge so that future researchers could build on it.
This essay addresses the barriers that exist against using evidence-based practice in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. It will also evaluate different strategies that can be used to develop the use of evidence-based practice among critical nurses who tend to older patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
The clients of this facility are the elderly patients who require nursing care services. Those with physical disability are also attended to in this care home. Physiotherapy, independent living training and palliative care are the services offered in the care home (Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales, 2012).
Furthermore, some interventions which reliable researches showed to have significant benefits have been largely ignored. By bringing together the results of research in a systematic way, appraising its quality in the light of question being asked synthesizing the results in an explicit way and making the knowledge base more accessible, it is hoped to foster a greater sensitivity to the evidence by researchers, policy makers, health practitioners and the public.
However, the use of the term "evidence based" had confused many practitioners. Several researches were done to clarify the term. Aside from misconceptions and misinterpretations, evidence based nursing practice is also plagued with debates and issues that need to be resolved.
The main reason the patients on ventilator needs to be monitored and managed with dexterity is ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), which adds to the morbidity and mortality statistics associated with ventilator management and hence this condition needs to be prevented (Fagon et al., 1996).
Its goal is to eliminate unsound or excessively risky practices in favour of those that have better outcomes.
"Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is a thoughtful integration of the best available evidence, coupled with clinical expertise. As such it enables health practitioners of all varieties to address healthcare questions with an evaluative and qualitative approach.
ed need for the increase in the number of Acute Care for the Elderly Units to allow for the provision of specialized quality care for this group of patients (Jaipaul & Rosenthal, 2009; British Geriatric Society, 2012).
With geriatric care being a key area of interest for me,
Thus, they ensure that the participants remain updated on any new occurrences during the research process.
Evidence-based practice is a critical approach to offer the unsurpassed quality care to patients as
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice for FREE!