Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/nursing/1622519-restraints-and-seclusion
https://studentshare.org/nursing/1622519-restraints-and-seclusion.
Restraints and Seclusion al Affiliation) Angela, L. (2007). Addressing Seclusion Practices. Creating Safety 3), 21-25.The article reports negative psychological effects of seclusion and restraint. It is found that it leads to acute reactions of stress on patients. It was found that seclusion experience exacerbates the agitation of patients. A research interviewed patients after their stay in hospital and found out that they are traumatized when secluded or restrained, or when they watch other patients undergo the exercise.
They view the procedure as a punishment. It was identified that 24 out of the 27 restrained patients had negative outcomes to seclude.Blank, K. (2010). From Coercion to Compassion. Ending Seclusion and Restraint, 3(4), 56. The article raises the concern if restrained re-traumatizes the sick at their most vulnerable, if seclusion damages the alliance of therapeutic and if that is the case if it can undergo justification. Studies from Massachusetts consider the vulnerable to be mostly affected by seclusion.
The vulnerable consist of those with past sexual abuse, physical abuse, physical trail, developmentally disabled, physically trail, and sensory impaired patients. Therefore, seclusion can easily lead to re-traumatization to the above named group of individual.LaFond, R. (2007, September). Reducing Seclusion and Restraint for Improved Patient and Staff Safety. In a https://www.crisisprevention.com., 2 (4), 12 Retrieved July 9, 2013, from https://www.crisi prevention .com/CPI/media /Media/Resources/research/Lafond-from-07-JSM-JOU-002.
PdfThis article “Reducing seclusion and restraint for improved patient and staff safety” by Randall Lafond talks about the benefits of avoiding seclusion and restraints for patients. The author states that there should be legal law which reduces seclusion and restraint among patients. The article explains the way in which health care services disregard the importance of the reduction of seclusion and restraints. He states that staff must be trained to encourage the practice of reducing seclusion and restraint among patients.
As per LaFond, “In the baseline year of 2002, 83 episodes of seclusion and restraint were documented. The total documented time was 220:03 minutes against 1606 admissions and a total of 16,054 patient days”. He asserts that for the safety of psychiatric patients the reduction of seclusion and restraints is important.Master, K. (2004). Can narrative therapy decrease the use of seclusion and restraint, 2 (4), 34. Retrieved July 8, 2013, from http://www.aacap.org/AACAP/M ember Resources/Practice_Information/SR_Articles/Can_Narrative_Therapy_Decrease_th e_Use_of_Seclusion_and_Restraint.
aspxThis article by Kim Masters states whether the use of narrative therapy has the ability to decrease use of seclusion and restraint among patients. The article explains that programs developed with patient support allow more space for reducing seclusion and restraint as well as for performing physical intervention. The narrative therapy mentioned here is a program through which medical centers can have a perspective of the patient on their own behavior. According to “Once the narrative study is complete, it can be reinforced by encouraging the child or adolescent to share the findings with the peer and demonstrate its effect on daily activities”.
The author claims that narrative therapy is a better solution for patient’s personality development and growth.Harper, G. (2003). Restraining and secluding children . Paradigm shift, 1(2), 22. Retrieved July 8, 2013, from http://www.aacap.org/ AACAP/Mem berries Sources/Practice I information/SR_Articles/Restraining_and_Secluding_Children_A_ Paradigm_Shift.aspxThis article compiled by Gordon Harper exclusively talks about the restraint and seclusion on child in - patients. The author writes that seclusion and restraint are highest among children and explains how this change happened.
The author claims that the increase in seclusion and restraint happened on many levels like individual, program and administration. According to “This paradigm shift is bringing the child psychiatry back to forgotten roots .For two decades, reduction approaches to illness have too often made the child an object rather than a partner”. The article concludes that the reduction in seclusion and restrain will appreciate the social constructionist behavior and sense of partnership among child patients.Witte, L. (2007).
Using Training in Verbal skill . Reduce the Use of Seclusion and Restraint, 4(1), 34.The article outlines the database for the dead. It is estimated that between 50 and150 deaths occurs immediately or during restraint or seclusion in the United States. The reported numbers were below the magnitude of the issue, as many federal government and US states do not monitor seclusion and restraint use. The study researched on 150 deaths at a close range. There are only 7 deaths that were in line with seclusion.
Two of the patients’ lit fire in the seclusion, 1 patient asphyxiated in his airway’s sock. Only one patient passed on from subdural hemorrhage. 2 patients died in restraint were linked to pre-existing medical issues and 1 was attributed to polypharmacy.
Read More