Discussing strenghts and weaknesses in a article - Research Paper Example

Quantitative Versus Qualitative Research in Nursing Quantitative Versus Qualitative Research in Nursing Qualitative and quantitativeaspects of nursing are majorly centralized on the nursing research methods and practices which are further subdivided into naturalistic and positivist paradigms.1. Quantitative research on Packing wounds (URL: http://www.wounds-uk.com/pdf/content_10426.pdf)1.1. IntroductionQuantitative research on packing wounds under the main domain of nursing is aimed at aligning with the positivist paradigm.

It is a hard Science considered as a formal, objective, focused, deductive scientific approach in the efforts to solve problems related to packing wounds. Further still, it is recognized by the Nursing researchers as a fundamental basis for getting to know the causes and effect of packing wounds; analyzing the numbers and statistics of packing wound causes; and establishing specific and factual reality that can be measured and generalized. The title of the article is a weakness of the entire research process, and this is because of how the authors stated it.

Mccluskey and McCarthy who completed the research could have stated the title in a suggestive manner to draw the attention of readers on such an essential practice in nursing. For instance, they could state title in a way that reflects their stand.1.2. ProblemPacking a wound is a medical process that involves the application of packing materials such as sterile gauze to deep wound so as to absorb drainage from the wounds to allow for faster healing, initializing the healing process from the internal section of the wound towards the external section or outer skin.

The main purpose of setting up this qualitative research on packing wounds is therefore to effectively and conclusively determine the level of knowledge, skills, and competencies of nurses whom we entrust to attend to patients’ wounds (Wounds UK, 2008). The aim of the study is a formidable strength of the research the authors conducted. This is because the purpose of the study pioneered the study trying to determine the correlation between knowledge and competence in wound evaluation and management that had never been done prior to their study.1.3.

Research questionHow much knowledge in terms of empirical, aesthetic, personal and tacit knowhow do our nurses have or require to enable them be competent to the level of owning patients’ trust while being attended to? The research question strengthens the article, and this emanates from the way the authors tied the research question to the title, and this makes up for the statement of the title, which seems to be inadequate in the way it appeals to the readers.1.4. Literature reviewThe need for professionalism in wound care cuts through all ages and specialties as stated by the law, which illustrates that each and every patient with a wound deserves the right to get access to and receive a good minimum standard care irrespective of etiology of their wounds, where care is delivered by the medical practitioners.

Though wound care practices in nursing have been regarded as a new development when compared to other fields, medics based on their knowledge base have made advancements. This has caused none uniformity and lack of standardization in the practice. The article scores well on the framework of the literature review. This is because the literature factors in a considerable amount of evidential data on the historical background and a cross check with the modern practice.1.5. SampleA total of 150 nurses were exposed to the analysis experiment and given the questionnaires to fill in.

Out of 150 questionnaires, only 145 were completely filled and hence used to compile results. The sample size of the research is also a score, and this is because the authors wanted to know the capacity of nurses in wound assessment and knowledge, and they could determine this through examining nurses in their workplaces1.6. ProcedureAll the questionnaires were the same in terms of contents and basically what was being tested was to get the individual knowledge on wound care and management by the nurses.

The procedure is a great strength for the article because other than having the nurses fill questionnaires, the researchers also observed them while performing the wound packing procedures. 1.7. InstrumentsData collection instruments used were questionnaires, which were given to nurses and observation techniques, based on the wound cross-sectional photographs taken during medical administration. Questionnaires had both open and closed ended investigative questions that required factual and general understanding on how they have been managing wounds.

It is evident that the principle method used to collect data seems to be inadequate. This is because in as much as nursing knowledge in wound assessment and management provides it is evidential that knowledge on the issue does not entirely translate to competency. Therefore, in as much as they used two instruments, which are questionnaires and cross sectional photographs their emphasis could be on the latter and not on the former.1.8. Study ResultsOut of the questionnaires’ analysis, knowledge inadequacy among the nurses prevailed because of none standardized methods of knowledge acquisition, and irregular trainings on the same.

However, results also showed knowledge base skill indicators were average; good understanding of wound treatment based of tissue classifications and many others. The results of the study were indispensable for the nursing field. This is where in as much as they showed the relationship between knowledge and competency; it determined the importance of constant wound care knowledge on competency, which the nurses require during nursing practice.1.9. Implication for nursingConsidering the rampantly used technique to gain knowledge in this field of nursing profession, statistics showed enhanced performances for those who regularly attended to patients with wounds as compared to the vice versa.

Inconsistencies on the wound management criterion also showed very high. In conclusion, therefore, it means that much has to be done by medics and their professional body to enhance service provision and value for human life of those suffering from wound ailments. Definitely, the implications the research for the nursing fraternity is a high score for it detailed the importance of in practice training to boost the competency of nurses in wound assessment and management.ReferencesWolcott R. D., Cox S. B.

and Dowd S. E. (2010). Healing and healing rates of chronic wounds in the age of molecular pathogen diagnostics. J Wound Care. 2010; 19:272–281.Wounds UK (2008) Best Practice Statement: Optimising Wound Care. Wounds UK, London.http://www.wounds-uk.com/pdf/content_10426.pdf2. Qualitative Research on Family Presence in ICU(http://bmhlibrary.info/18310646.pdf)Qualitative research in medical works is a method used to develop nursing knowledge and skills for evidence-based nursing practices with solutions to human responses to the actual or potential nursing problems.2.1.

IntroductionICU stands for the Intensive Care Unit, and it is fundamentally meant to cater very serious medical conditions most of which are life threatening; hence need for immediate and close monitoring and support from special equipments to facilitate medical administration. The title of the article is sufficient to lead a reader on the contents of the study thus, a great strength for the article. Meanwhile, the number of author’s on the article is indicative of the in-depth of the study thus surmounting to the quality of the material therein. 2.2.

ProblemThis study is aimed at determining the advantages and disadvantages that come with a family’s presence during the entire process of resuscitation (http://bmhlibrary.info/18310646.pdf). As provided by most medical Acts, restriction has been practiced in most medical institution, though it was never viewed as a positive idea. This analysis will show that knowledge development concerning such family presence is limited by insufficient and lack of valid equipments to take account of key variables.

It is apparent that the idea of the research is indicative of the initial declaration in the title of the article, and this tells how much the authors have in store for the audience thus captivating the readers to continue reading on the article.2.3. Research questionsHow does unrestricted presence of family members or friends of an inpatient in the ICU impact on the normal performance and administration of medical attention by nurses and doctor in the health care institutions? The research questions correspond to the title of the article in a subtle manner such that without the title any reader can discern the contents of the article from that certain point onwards through the article.

This is a perfect score for the article because it makes the readers yearn for the results of the study all at once.2.4. Literature reviewFamily presence in the ICU with their relatives and friends is an issue that has ever since raised concerns. This research was carried out by measuring nurses’ perceptions with regards to family presence in the ICU, to scrutinize demographic variables and perceptions of nurses’ self-confidence and any risks/ benefits associated with unrestricted presence of family members in the ICU from various institutions of medical practices.

It is evident that the literature review was exhaustive because it tried to link the arising issues in the ICU resuscitation and the factors that may lead to issues. The stepwise presentation of the literature plays a significant role in the study because it offers that desire to find answers to the issues.2.5. SampleA survey was conducted between a group of nurses who were from multiple hospital units, who were examined on the differences in their perceptions as to nurses who had and who did not invite family presence in the ICU during medical administration.

The sample proved a weakness in a way in the article. This is because the design of the study involved nurses from different hospital units, and in as much they wanted to cover a wide group of nurses, it could be less expensive and tasking if they used nurses from just a few hospital units. This is because the interest was in the determination of self-confidence levels, which is a personal trait and not a collective trait of nurses in certain hospitals.2.6. ProcedureUsing interviews, questionnaires and observation techniques of data gathering among the sampled nurses, comprehensive results that actually satisfied the analysis criterion were obtained.

A total of 375 nurses completed the Family Presence Risk benefit scales and Family Presence Self-confidence Scale. The procedure and the instruments used were reflective of what the authors wanted to ascertain, and it produced commendable results. This is a strength for the article for it enabled collection of authentic data.2.7. Data AnalysisBases on the outcome, nurses’ perceptions of advanced benefits and minimized risks had relations to the membership within the professional organizations, professional certifications, and active participation in the ICU departments.

The results of the study tie well with the aim of the study and this is one of the best things to happen in a research study. It adds strength for the article for it offers answers to initial questions and even opens a door to future studies. 2.8. Study ResultsInterrelations between nurses, perceptions of risks, benefits and self-confidence on the Family presence in the ICU were established. Medics who invited family presence had self-confidence in managing such incidences and raised more benefits as opposed to risks/ disadvantages (P< 0.001). The results reflected the purpose of the study and they were conclusive of the two different instruments that can measure nurses’ perception on self-confidence, and the risk benefit ration of family presence in the ICU during resuscitation.2.9.

Implication for nursingOwing to the widely varied results pertaining to the risks and benefits of family presence during resuscitation that were due to the level of frequencies in which nurses invited family members to the ICU, and a proper analysis of the observed variations. The implications the study had on nursing is a formidable strength that affords questions as to what contributes to self-confidence among nurses during certain medical procedures. It is evident that a nurse who allows family members into the ICU is quite confident about the positive results of the procedure.

However, this self-confidence of nurses increases with other factors like professional certification. This is an indication that a nurse has to earn self-confidence, which can then boost the benefit risk ration of inviting family members into the ICU during resuscitation.Referenceshttp://bmhlibrary.info/18310646.pdf URL:http://nursing.advanceweb.com/Editorial/Content/PrintFriendly.aspx?CC=252475