Developing Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Bundle Evaluation Plan - Essay Example

Once the exercise commences, nurses or practitioners will utilize an electronic feedback tool to monitor the patient’s condition at prescribed intervals. Mainly, monitoring and comparison will be against the already known and earlier data regarding VAP prevalence. This is after 48 hours of intubation among ICU patients (Fineout-Overholt & Johnston, 2007). Comparing VAPB’s effectiveness with the already attained and recent data is due to the method’s risk. Since, both the caretakers and even nurses will be reluctant in allowing certain patients to experience VAP’s adverse effects while claiming it is an experimentation exercise. Besides, the participants while in this condition entail quick medical intervention to regain their stability, hence they cannot afford to act as a control group (Fineout-Overholt & Johnston, 2007).

• Variables utilized when evaluating project outcomes

            Variables will encompass varied intervals intentionally ascertained by the nurses or practitioners meant to record the patient’s progress. The intervals’ recording inception will be after intubation; earlier than the anticipated time, which numerous studies normally contend ICU patients start to experience VAP (O’Keefe-McCarthy, Santiago & Lau, 2008). Since, the core purpose of this exercise will encompass comparing nurses’ recordings and the recent data whose collection was in the absence of VAPB (O’Keefe-McCarthy, Santiago & Lau, 2008). This is to ascertain its effectiveness, which both the nurses and practitioners ought to advocate in their practice to shun VAP's adverse effects. These encompass augmenting mortality rates, severe pain experienced by ICU patients, and high costs involved in alleviating VAP (O’Keefe-McCarthy, Santiago & Lau, 2008).

• Educating project participants

            Since the exercise’s participants involve ICU patients who may be unable to make informed verdicts by themselves, the nurses will have to seek consent from their relatives or their caregivers (O’Keefe-McCarthy, Santiago & Lau, 2008). This is especially when it is necessary because the caregivers or relatives may notice extra attention coupled with meticulous data collection by the nurses. However, the exercise will be to the patient’s advantage because it does not involve any pain or extra harm but aids one to recuperate. Therefore, the prescribed procedures meant to prepare the entire exercise will be informed by either the relatives or caregivers. This is to assure them VAPB is an already tested procedure, but the practitioners need to attain extra information regarding its effectiveness (O’Keefe-McCarthy, Santiago & Lau, 2008).

• Tools(s) to evaluate project outcomes

            Project outcomes assessment will entail the application of an interdisciplinary approach (O’Keefe-McCarthy, Santiago & Lau, 2008). Mainly, this encompasses the involvement of practitioners from varied fields, who will contribute to analyzing, and making both comparisons and deductions regarding VAPB’s effectiveness (O’Keefe-McCarthy, Santiago & Lau, 2008). Hence, utilize EBP though regarding the recently collected data; practitioners will contact meticulous research (Fineout-Overholt & Johnston, 2007). This is to ensure its accuracy when comparing with similar and earlier data because they cannot risk choosing certain patients to like a control group (O’Keefe-McCarthy, Santiago & Lau, 2008).