The Impact of Self-Management Support on the Progression of Kidney Disease - Research Paper Example

? Critique of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Articles Critique of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Critique of QuantitativeResearch The impact of self-management support on the progression of chronic kidney disease—a prospective randomized controlled trial The title of the research article appears appropriate because it highlights the main objective of the study as a probe seeking to establish whether self-management programs present any impacts on the progression of chronic kidney disease. The title also succeeds in highlighting that a randomized research with a control. However, the title does not highlight the stage of the chronic kidney disease of the target patients. Although the title does provide a precise idea of what the article seeks to tackle, it fails to highlight the research variables. The abstract captures the main ideas of the article in a concise but informative summary. The abstract begins with informative ideas as background information concerning chronic kidney disease, which is the issue of focus in the paper (Cheng et al. 2011). It highlights the objectives of the experiment and a description of the methodologies used in the research. In the abstract, the results and findings are outlined in a precise form. Moreover, the abstract presents the main conclusions drawn from the study. The authors present the identified problem with clarity, extensiveness and relevance. From the introduction, it becomes clear that there is need for more efforts especially regarding the management of chronic kidney disease (Cheng et al. 2011). The authors introduce the surging problem and highlight that self-management support is one of the strategies that can help in slowing down the progression of the chronic kidney disease (CKD) to its final stages. The introduction lays a basis for a coherent and persuasive argument on the potential of self-support management support in delaying the progression of CKD end stage renal disease that brings about many complexities (Hoskins & Mariano, 2004). Nurses can play an advanced role by helping patients with the relevant guidelines required for an effective self-management support program, making the issue a critical topic in nursing. Evidently, the paradigm of methods used in the research exhibits the potential of addressing the problem identified (Cheng et al. 2011). A quantitative research is the best because it will provide data on the progression of chronic kidney disease from one level to the next. The hypothesis highlighted in the paper is the fact that self-management support systems have the potential of CKD. The authors highlight that the self-management programs is one of the ways through which the progression of CKD occurs (Polit & Beck, 2013). Self-management is one of avenues where participation of the patient occurs, which is a paramount issue in reducing rates of progression of the CKD to its advanced state. The authors also mention the critical variables that will define the rate at which the progression occurs in both patients under the self-management support programs and the control group. The authors introduce a level of consistency in the conceptual framework of addressing the problem, and the available literature. The authors offer a short review of the available literature concerning the chronic kidney disease, explaining how it results and the different stages of its progression. From literature review provided, it becomes evident that self-management is one of the ways that when coupled with early diagnosis present the probability of reducing the progression rate of CKD. The literature review represents the data reflected in previous primary researches concerning the progression of CKD to the end stage renal disease (Cheng et al. 2011). The authors highlight that there is an existing gap in the available literature because previous researches have not addressed the impacts of self-management support programs in altering the progression rate of CKD. The author highlights a conceptual framework in the beginning that the article seeks to address. The author introduces the main concepts, and ideas that relate to the key concepts. The authors defined the concept of self-management support program and the theories that surround it. Moreover the article suggests the different variables that the authors considered in their study and how such parameters exhibited connection to the progression of CKD to its advanced stages (Tappen, 2011). Critique of Qualitative Research “Telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: views and Experiences of patients and specialist breast care nurses” The title of the article proves to be very suitable for the article. The title chosen by the authors meets the requirements of an effective title as it mentions the target population in the article. The article considers the experiences and breast cancer care specialists. From the title, the reader realizes that the study adopted a qualitative approach because the title makes it evident that the article will evaluate the views of both patients and specialists concerning the effect of telephone follow-ups by nurses handling breast cancer patients (Beaver, Williamson, & Chalmers, 2010). The abstract captures the main ideas of the article in a concise but informative summary. The abstract begins by highlighting the aims and objectives of the article. It then offers informative ideas as background information concerning the telephone follow-up concept, which is the issue of focus in the paper. It highlights the design of the study, and a description of the methodologies used in the research (Beaver, Williamson, & Chalmers, 2010). In the abstract, the results and findings are outlined in a precise form. Moreover, the abstract presents the main conclusions drawn from the study. The authors provide an exhaustive abstract that touches on all the sections of the article (Boswell & Cannon, 2014). The introduction lays a basis for a coherent and persuasive argument on the use of telephone follow-up and the efficiencyof such conversations in helping breast cancer patients make consultations and receive reassurance from the nurses. This is after identifying and describing the scope of the problem, and its relevance (Beaver, Williamson, & Chalmers, 2010). Nurses can play an advanced role by helping patients with the relevant guidelines and reassurance required for coping with cancer over the telephone without the challenges presented by consultation within the hospital setting, making the issue a critical topic in nursing (Bryman, 2012). Evidently the introduction describes multiple ideas concerning the telephone follow-ups and their realities (Evans, Hardy, & Shaw, 2010). Research questions have not been highlighted although there is a justification for the absence of these because the authors have offered extensive background information that highlights the gap that needs addressing. The article offers an extensive literature review that outlines the value of telephone follow-up programs that have served as a replacement for the hospital follow-up sessions that were preferred in the past. The review of existing literature reveals that the hospital follow-up programs presented multiple challenges for both the breast care specialists and patients. From the literature, it becomes evident that there were inconveniences of time that barred breast cancer patients from accessing such follow-up sessions (Beaver, Williamson, & Chalmers, 2010). The authors introduce the concept of telephone follow-ups and how it emerged as a more effective way of offering breast cancer patients the relevant encouragement. The highlighted literature is of critical relevance to the issue addressed in the paper, indicating that the authors carried out extensive and specific research concerning the topic before carrying out their study. The article exhibits a conceptual framework in the description of the effects of the telephone follow-up to both patients and breast care specialists. The authors describe the perceptions of different patients interviewedafter having been receiving follow-ups over the phone concerning their condition. There are definitions and interpretations of the concepts surrounding follow-ups(Beaver, Williamson, & Chalmers, 2010). The authors interpret the views presented by both thepatients and breast care specialists, and draw a conclusion that follow-ups over the telephone serve as effective avenues for breast care specialists to address the needs of their patients. As described above, both qualitative and quantitative researches exhibit a certain structure with certain that must highlight certain ideas. However, quantitative and qualitative researches exhibit differences because quantitative research focuses on variables that present data that becomes critical in drawing conclusions after analysis. Apparently, authors must describe all the variables clearly, and establish a conceptual framework that remains relevant. Qualitative research is usually interpretative, and the authors must establish a relationship between the methods adopted and the problem that needs solving. References Beaver, K., Williamson, S., & Chalmers, K. (2010).Telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: views and experiences of patients and specialist breast care nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19, 2916-2924. Boswell, C., & Cannon, S. (2014). Introduction to nursing research: Incorporating evidence-based practice. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cheng et al. (2011).The impact of self-management support on the progression of chronickidney disease—a prospective randomized controlled trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant 26(11), 3560-6. Evans, A., Hardy, M., & Shaw, I. (2010). Evidence and knowledge for practice. Cambridge: Polity. Hoskins, C. N., & Mariano, C. (2004).Research in nursing and health: Understanding and using quantitative and qualitative methods. New York, NY: Springer Pub. Co. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2013). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice. China: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Tappen, R. M. (2011). Advanced nursing research: From theory to practice. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. Read More