We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Debate for Australia euthanasia - Essay Example

Comments (0)
This paper “Debate for Australia euthanasia” will show why the majority have prevailed to have euthanasia remain illegal but also the logic and strength of those who argue for the legalization of the same. It has been argued that legalization of euthanasia will lead to disrespect for human life…
Download full paper
Debate for Australia euthanasia
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Debate for Australia euthanasia

Download file to see previous pages... The same view is held by the Islamic religion (Bulow et al., 2008). Therefore, the opponents view legalization of euthanasia as being immoral and against God’s commandment since it does not sanctify life. However, the proponents have responded by arguing that legalizing euthanasia will actually uphold human dignity. They have argued that no person should be allowed to undergo torture from terminal illness. Such continuous pain, they have pointed out, which medicine has no control over degrades human dignity and defeats the very logic for continuing to live. Therefore, euthanasia will do more good than harm (Norval & Gwyther, 2003). In addition, they have also said that the society is built on fundamental values of compassion and mercy. The society should therefore rise to the occasion and help the terminally ill from suffering unbearably without any help (Norval & Gwyther, 2003). Euthanasia as murder versus right-based arguments The opponents have viewed legalization of euthanasia has a commission to commit murder. They have argued that any action intended to take away another person’s life is inherently wrong and should never be allowed even if the victim has given the consent (Somerville, 2003). Euthanasia has therefore been viewed has killing of other human beings and fervently opposed on those grounds. On the other hand, the proponents have made an argument against this view by pointing out to the principles of autonomy and self-determination. The argument has been that a patient has a right to his or her life and therefore can determine on how he or she should die (Bartels & Otlowski, 2010; Kerridge, Lowe & Stewart, 2009). The autonomy principle allows...
The argument has been that a patient has a right to his or her life and therefore can determine on how he or she should die (Bartels & Otlowski, 2010; Kerridge, Lowe & Stewart, 2009). The autonomy principle allows a patient of sound mind to make any decision pertaining to his or her life as long as such a decision does nobody any harm (Norval & Gwyther, 2003). Along this line, it is argued that a patient has a right to determine when he or she no longer wants to live. It is further argued that, due to the principle of autonomy, a patient has a right to his or her own decisions and equally a right to a dignified death (Bartels & Otlowski, 2010). In general, the proponents argue that by patients being denied the right to euthanasia, the society is actually tramping upon their (patients’) rights and forcing decisions on them (patients) which they (patients) do not necessarily ascribe to. In other word, the insistence on the sustenance of the status quo in reference to legalization of euthanasia is a continued violation of patients’ rights and thus those of human rights. How have the opponents responded to these accusations of violating human rights specifically the principles of autonomy? The proponents have come out strongly and fiercely claiming that actually allowing euthanasia is an abuse of autonomy and human rights contrary to what the proponents have said. The opponents have argued that the principle of autonomy advocates for conditions that favor autonomy. Any attempt to suppress any condition. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
Euthanasia is Greek for “happy death,” and involves the active killing of another because one's life is not worth living. The practice has been widely legalized throughout Europe, although the United States has yet to legalize it.
15 Pages(3750 words)Essay
Euthanasia is commonly referred as ‘mercy killing’ or a ‘good death’. It entails bringing about the death of a patient in belief that the existence of the patient is so bad that he or she is better off dead than alive.
13 Pages(3250 words)Essay
Euthanasia in Australia
Euthanasia in Australia Introduction The ethics of euthanasia has been debated for quite some time in Australia. Though certain territories of Australia managed to legalise the same for a short time; presently, euthanasia is illegal in all territories of Australia.
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Law and Euthanasia
Law and Euthanasia. Terminal illness or disease is a medical term that found its popularity in the 20th century. Terminal illness is regarded as a disease that cannot be cured; therefore, patients suffering such diseases are bound to die specifically within a very short period (Keown, 2002; Pg.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Euthanasia Debate
They are illegal in many jurisdictions but data shows that physicians still conduct these procedures. This paper reviewed existing literature on the controversy as to the practices and identified the need for legalization of physically assisted death within the context of the involved ethical concerns and public utility.
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
Can Euthanasia Be Ethical Euthanasia: the Debate
Life is valued but in certain conditions when it is extremely painful or intolerable, the word euthanasia that is merciful end of life comes to the minds of patients, their families, or medical authorities. The aim of this essay is to discuss euthanasia, definition, types, religious, cultural, and ethical debate, to reach a conclusion of how and when euthanasia can be ethical (if ever).
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
Against the Legalisation of Euthanasia
Legislative discussions for permitting active euthanasia in various countries have been repeatedly debated among their politicians, jurists, ethicists and even medical practitioners often resulting in drastic to insignificant or ambiguous changes in the concerned country’s legal framework.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Ethics Class- Euthanasia
This article tries to explain the ethical views especially that of Hume’s, Hobbes’s and Machiavelli’s and gives an insight into what these philosophers and others had to say on euthanasia. It also
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay
Acute Euthanasia
However, euthanasia is one of the most highly charged and widely debated subjects of the century. Euthanasia is sometimes also called imposed death, mercy death and assisted suicide. It is the termination of the life of a
5 Pages(1250 words)Term Paper
Euthanasia debate: Religious Law vs. Utilitarianism
Nevertheless, the term euthanasia is seen to generally imply and easy and gentle process of death. There are a number of ethical arguments that have been fronted both in support, and in
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic Debate for Australia euthanasia for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us