Evaluation of Process - Research Paper Example

Evaluation of Process Evaluation of Process The purposive sampling method that was used in the investigationis effective because of the specificity of the purpose to coronary heart disease. Through a purposive sample, the respondents were selected from individuals with coronary heart disease who were prescribed into a medical regimen for the management of their heart condition. A purposive sample is described as an ideal approach of gathering data from individuals who are likely to provide accurate and sufficient information on the area being investigated (Singh, 2009).

In addition, a purposive sample allows investigation to be more objective (Kothari, 2010). It is in this reason that the purposive sample was selected to ensure that subjectivity was eliminated during the study. In addition, the purposive sampling approach was aimed at health care professional that had adequate knowledge on coronary heart disease. In this regard, the credibility and accuracy of the gathered data was ensured. Questionnaires were also used in the collection of the outcome data.

This is due to the advantages of questionnaires in an investigation. Questionnaires are said to be an effective method through which investigators are able to gather data from a relatively large group of respondents. Therefore questionnaires were used to gather sufficient data on coronary heart disease and adherence to medical regimen. This included a large group of respondents which allowed the investigator to achieve more data for analysis, presentation and recommendation. In addition, questionnaires are effective because they are standardized and hence more objective in the collection of data (Kothari, 2010).

These illustrations demonstrate the motivation behind the use of questionnaires in the collection of outcome data and their effectiveness. Meetings were also organized during which the respondents were engaged in interviews on their adherence to medical regimen for coronary heart disease. The application of interviews as tools of collecting data is attributed to its advantage of achieving clarity for specific questions (Goddard & Melville, 2009). As a result, the researcher is able to probe further into the area of study.

During the study, interviews were also used to ensure that respondent who did not have reading skills would effectively participate in the investigation. Therefore through the use of these methods of gathering outcome data the objectives and purpose of the investigation process were met accurately, effectively and sufficiently. The outcome data will be evaluated for validity, applicability and reliability. In order to ensure that the outcome data is valid, it would be measured against the objectives of the investigation.

If the data is accurate and relevant to the research questions and objective, then its validity will be authenticated. Moreover, the applicability of the data outcomes will be determined in relation to their relevance in solving real life problems that are associated with lack of compliance to medical regimens for coronary heart disease by the affected patients. Moreover, the applicability of the data outcomes will be measured to determine if it can be used to come up with an effective ways through which patients can be motivated to adhere to their medical regimens.

Finally, the reliability of the gathered data will be determines through the evaluation of the sources of the data. The purposive sample that provided the data will therefore be evaluated in regard to their level of expertise, knowledge and skills on coronary heart disease. More importantly the data to be collected from the patients of the heart disorder will be checked on reliability based on the experience of these patients in the use of various medical regiments in the management of coronary heart disease.

If the data outcomes fail to provide positive results, then recommendations and indications will be provided for future research on the topic. This means that the possible reasons why the methodologies used failed to produce positive results will be presented as an indication for future research. Moreover, hypotheses will be drawn based on the investigation and the outcome data that would be used by future researchers on the topic. In this regard, this investigation will prove useful as a contribution into the body of knowledge on the topic.

More specifically the outcomes of the study would be analyzed by future researchers with a view of identifying possible gaps in this area of study. In this sense, future studies will contribute into the field of cardiology and specifically in the management of coronary heart disease through the use the most effective combinations of medical regimens. As a result, medical practitioners will be equipped with knowledge and skills that will promote quality of care. More importantly patients with coronary heart disease will be able to understand their roles in the management of the condition.

References Goddard, W., & Melville, S. (2009). Research methodology: An introduction. Lansdowne: Juta Kothari, C. R. (2010). Research methodology: Methods & techniques. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd. Singh, Y. K. (2009). Fundamental of research methodology and statistics. New Delhi: New Age International.