This is a critical appraisal of Baille and Galagher (2011), “Respecting dignity in care in diverse care settings: Strategies of UK nurses” in the International Journal of Nursing Practice, 17, 336-341…
Download file to see previous pages...
According to Brockopp et al (2003), critical appraisal process refers to the concept of providing a summary of a research article whilst identifying the key aspects in a bid to evaluate the quality and merit of such studies. Evaluation of quality and merit of research articles via the critical appraisal technique is based on predetermined criteria (Brockopp et al, 2003). Baille and Galagher (2011) used qualitative multisite case study within seven organizations in their quest to finding out nurses’ views on dignity issues across the UK health-care background. From prepositions of Gangeness and Yurkovich (2006), there is no doubt that Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) is a better and more effective framework for analyzing the qualitative research by Baille and Galagher (2011). Critical appraisal of this research is aimed at providing various scholars, researchers, as well as health care practitioners with adequate assessment regarding validity and reliability of the study. Reliability and validity of the research will help establish whether the results of can be effectively used in making decisions or understanding UK’s health care settings. ...
Baille and Galagher (2011) applied the qualitative multisite case study in order to answer their research questions and attain research objectives. Through semi-structured interviews, Baille and Galagher (2011) obtained the necessary data for analysis and carrying out discussion, which is meant to influence perception and knowledge of various stakeholders on views of nurses’ dignities across the UK’s health care settings. As provided by the Public Health Resource (2008), CASP will suitably apply on the study by Baille and Galagher (2011) through stages. RESEARCH METHOD Newell and Burnard (2006) assert that interviews are a method and instrument for obtaining adequate data within qualitative research design. In addition, unlike quantitative research methodology, Newell and Burnard (2006) strongly confirm that qualitative research methodology is suitable for researching in fields or subjects requiring understanding of people’s feelings as in this case is the nurses’ views on dignity across divergent health care settings. Walsh et al (2004) add that through interviews researchers are able to not only analyze obtained results but also develop a sense of sensitivity, which make the whole research effective, efficient, reliable, and valid. Whilst interviewing different participants from seven organizations, Baille and Galagher (2011) used qualitative research methodology to obtain data given that their research was aimed at establishing and evaluating views of nurses in respect to dignity in diverse care settings. Through qualitative research design, Baille and Galagher (2011) were able to employ thematic analysis thereby providing an understanding on their research or study topic. On this basis, the only suitable and effective framework for critically
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Modern, contemporary cultures seek to assimilate and subsequently transmit values, which directly aim at sustaining human dignity; additionally life by itself carries a fundamental value pertaining to dignity that merits respect.
Most attend because; they lack social interaction as they live alone and have health and mobility problems which could cause them to become isolated. This report will provide a detailed explanation of four communication skills used by care workers or service users in the care setting.
The term ‘dignity’ derived from the Latin word dignitas or dignus that means worthy, can be defined as “quality of being worthy of honour” or “a sense of self-importance” (Collins Language. com, 2011). One can view dignity as an individual’s personal characteristic, recognised by self and others.
In health care, however, communication is needed to help boost the morale of patients or even to make them feel secured. Constant communication between the patient and the nurse will definitely develop into a relationship of trust which can be of great help for the fast recovery of patients.
According to this theory, errors can be divided into three categories: violations, mistakes, and slips and lapses. The critical difference in these categories is that violations are deliberate errors while mistakes, slips and lapses are non-deliberate errors.
Conflicts in numerous health care settings have become a pervasive issue across the globe. The health care industry is subjected, to diverse strains because of the increasing demand for right to use to health care facilities.
These older adults are usually prone to chronic diseases which often eventually confine them in hospitals for prolonged periods of time (Lubkin and Larsen, 2012). These diseases include diabetes, cancer, osteoarthritis, and similar other chronic illnesses (Lubkin and Larsen, 2012).
Health care experts must anticipate experiencing ethical stress in clinical practice. Ethical stress is normally interpreted as a practice worry in which two moral principles compete. Ethical stress is usually experienced by health experts as they attempts to make clinical decisions concerning inconsistent ethical principles; for instance, when attempting to balance keeping away harm with patient autonomy (Zuzelo, 2007).
Research has shown that most hospital nurses do not have the expertise to handle behavioural disturbances like dementia which are mostly managed in mental health wards, thus making management of acutely ill elderly patients very complex