Download file to see previous pages...
People like it ‘free’ when it comes to downloading from the internet. As internet is normally meant for sharing of information, the concept is hardly hit as the copyright material are also made available online by various file sharing websites inflicting huge monetary losses to the companies. Hummel, Lechner and Eikemeier (n.d. p.1) mentioned that peer to peer (p2p) seems to be synonym for the popular sharing of music and other kinds of digital data and the concept is definitely liked by the consumers which is evident from the fact that Napster, one popular p2p application, reaching 50 million user marks quicker than any technology. It is further stated that p2p technologies have become subject of many controversial discussions and red rag to the media industry because the technology is often used for the unauthorized distribution of copyrighted material (Aichroth, Hasselbach, Thommes and Ullrich, n.d., p.47). The music industry is suffering huge losses due to decrease in their sales of record labels which has given rise to legal sanctions ordering the closure of websites indulging in file sharing activities.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
This paper, Legal Issues and Alternative Solutions, attempts at showing the ineffectiveness of legal litigation against these defendants and at providing alternative solutions to prevent the P2P file sharing infringements. Sharing information by sharing files is vital for the success of an individual or an organization.
Free online file sharing is a highly unethical issue based on the moral issue of theft. It is morally wrong for an individual to share other people’s property for free, leading in heavy losses for artists
Peer-to-peer file sharing software can be harmful to the companies’ information security because it can risk installation of malicious code, exposure of sensitive information, susceptibility to attack, causing denial of
This decision is representative of a profound strategic shift in the music industry, which has already litigated over 30,000 individuals since 2003 (Yar, 2008: p44). This legal approach was criticized for its inability to stem illegal music
Should an individual act in a manner likely to encourage infringement of copyrights laws, she or she is liable as stated in the copyright Act (Holzmann, 1995). Inducement of infringement by abetting aid is punishable under the Act. Actions likely to abet infringement include
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Peer To Peer File Sharing for FREE!