Cmpare and contrast 2 articles Imperialists vs anti-imperilalists ,explain debate /confict being adressed ;explain the large issue ,who are the participants .What events have shaped attitudes of the public and the authors of the pieces on this deba - Essay Example

No doubt the English brought about prosperity in far off and hitherto barren lands with their innovative and expansionist policies, which enabled them to rule in most parts of the world during the last few centuries of the previous decade. However to believe that the English should have used their superior status as a dominating imperial power to enforce their dominance and ruling status in all parts of the globe including the American continent, seems rather naïve and based against the true laws of nature which has imparted certain superior survival characteristics to people of other races as well.

Retaliation to English supremacy is the sheer contrast to the above belief of Rhodes as shown in the second article discussing the letter by Commissioner Lin who was appointed by the Chinese Emperor in the eighteenth century to check the spread of opium trade in China, which was used as a subtle trading activity by the Englishmen to set foot on and dominate the Chinese region. The Chinese people resisted and eventually succeeded in keeping the British away from its mainland. In fact, with the exception of Hong Kong, the English traders failed in their designs and trends in mainland China, which has eventually evolved into the only successful communist regime which has shown some degree of success till date.

According to the excerpted letter in the article, the Chinese successfully initiated a two pronged strategy to curb opium trade and stop the ingress of English merchants which led to the Opium wars between the two dominant civilizations of the world during that era. The letter highlights the grave injustice and the unconcerned nature of the English merchants who seem to be motivated by profit alone while promoting opium use in a foreign land, fully aware that it was a drug of abuse strictly restricted in their own country.

It points out