The Adoption Act of 2002 is what changed around all of the problems that the Act of 1976 brought. One of its purposes was to make updates and changes to the Adoption Act of 1976. One of the biggest changes to come was that the adoption act focused more on the child’s welfare in all of the decisions relating to the adoption. More support was offered for both the child and the adoptive parent(s), and in areas such as financial support, housing, and general therapy and counseling1. The child was taken more into consideration as a human being, rather than “just another adoption case.
” The act of 1976 depleted many of the rights brought on by Parental Responsibility, but the act of 2002 helped to shine more light on the things that needed to be attended to, for the sake of the child and the parents or guardians. The mishap between the Adoption Act of 1976 and Parental Responsibility was due to the fact that the Adoption Act refers to adopted children and adopting parents, while Parental Responsibility refers to everyone, biological or adopted2. The two have similar laws to be followed, but at the same time they have separate laws that contradict each other.
Parental Responsibility gives the child more freedom of choice when it concerns them. Their views and thoughts are taken into consideration. The Adoption Act gives less freedom to the child while granting more freedom concerning the child to the parent. The Adoption Act of 2006 presented a few changes to Parental Responsibility, smoothing things out and making the laws coincide with each other. The Act of 2006 also focuses more on the aspects of adoption that do not concern the actual adoption process.
Compared the Act of 2002, the Act of 2006 offers more support, advice, and guidance for all of those involved in the adoption process, including the children and those taking charge of the adoption. The Adoption Act of 2006 also heeded to the
...Download file to see next pages Read More