Dq-8-Extra-Terence - Coursework Example

WORK EXTRA al Affiliation WORK EXTRA Introduction Organization management has changed over time, and the change is fast driven by the improvement in technology. The new generation has adopted to go the technology way in the management while the old folks are hard to teach the new tricks. Flexibility is impossible to them, and it doesn’t seem the situation will change any sooner. Thus, due to the changes arising in the organization, the paper analyzes various challenges and views that are held by the individuals and discusses new ways that an organization implements to make the management easier.

What about the human element? We discovered, quite some time ago, the communication and transparency of action were strong motivators in employee satisfaction.Human elements are those activities that are used to solve and address human concerns at work environments. An employee can usually be embroiled into such vices as corruption, need for accountability and unwarranted rivalry among them. Hence, virtues such as communication and being transparent are critical to the employees. Through, communication, they can express themselves concerning their problems at work.

On the other hand, management through its open mindedness can listen without disparity or any favoritism (Degelsegger & Kesselring, 2012). Thus, the outcome of such a resolution is usually satisfactorily than if the arbitration was to be done without their awareness and participation.(2)Are the Gen-Y folks cognizant of the need to interact at a non-technological level?Generation Y is the group that call themselves the digital world and are aligned to their technological appliances in most of their activities.

But to say that they are not aware of the non-technological interactions and their importance will be a fallacy. They know, practice it and can evaluate their values but have chosen to ignore (Luftman, Zadeh, Derksen, Santana, Rigoni & Huang, 2013). Such is the hypocrisy that the generation Y has adopted. Through non-technological interaction such as face-to-face meetings, it enables us to understand the communication better since they can study the non-verbal cues for expression and make conclusions that is impossible with technology communication.(3)Will management become only a technological tool?

Management involves critical decision making in any organization and to say that it will remain to be a technical tool, will only make things worse. Business decisions such as closing deals are better done in a face-to-face meeting rather than the phone calls. By meeting a person on an individual basis as a manager, he/she will know and understand the nature of the business by mere use of body languages, tonal variations, and emotions. From here, the manager can make the decision that helps the organization than if he/she was to make a call that could not provide a clear picture of the situation (Newman, Wiggins, Crall, Graham, Newman, & Crowston, 2012).

How subculture in organizations influenced leadership evolutionOrganizations have diverse cultures, and each of them is expected to conform to its norms. These cultures have been mixed to form the subculture between different sectors and among the employees. At the present times, many managers are confronted with multifaceted issues in an attempt to make their organizations succeed (Thamhain, 2013). Hence, a majority of their problems is a result of failure to understand or act according to the expected standards.

Organizational cultures hence have influenced a lot of decision in leadership in an organization. One such way is the implementations of strategies at work. Leaders tend to act on plans that are used to achieve the organization goals with respect to the culture to which there are expected to conform to. In an attempt that they implement the strategies without considering them, they will fail; thus they will abide by their culture if they are to succeed (Grimm, & Railsback, 2012). For example, if a political party wants to popularize its policies, they will have to do so in a manner that conform to the parties requirements.

Failure to do so, they will have no force among the populace and will most likely lose an election if they were to contend.Another development in management enhanced by subculture is the negotiations in the organization. Because employees have diverse backgrounds and agencies contrast in culture, the management provides room for dialog with the other partners for them to have a mutual agreement (Sirriyeh, Lawton, Armitage, Gardner & Ferguson, 2012). For instance, if one organization was to offer any service to another firm, then they must do so in a style that compliments the other groups’ beliefs.

ConclusionManagement of organizations requires coordination of various departments and employees. However, leaders must adhere to human standards if they are to motivate their workforce and achieve their goals. The management is also changing to technology standards driven by the Y generation. If the new structure can be complemented with the non-technological tools, organizations will gain more since they simplify work among the various workers and different groups. Finally, society conform to different cultures, if they are accepted and used appropriately, the group will make profits hence they guide the goals and objectives.

ReferencesDegelsegger, A., & Kesselring, A. (2012). Do Non-humans Make a Difference? The Actor-Network-Theory and the Social Innovation Paradigm. In Challenge Social Innovation (pp. 57-72). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Grimm, V., & Railsback, S. F. (2012). Designing, formulating, and communicating agent-basedmodels. In Agent-based models of geographical systems (pp. 361-377). Springer Netherlands.Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The Effect of Transparency on Trust in Government: A Cross‐National Comparative Experiment.

Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575-586.Luftman, J., Zadeh, H. S., Derksen, B., Santana, M., Rigoni, E. H., & Huang, Z. D. (2013). Key information technology and management issues 2012–2013: an international study. Journal of Information Technology, 28(4), 354-366.Nef, T., Ganea, R. L., Müri, R. M., & Mosimann, U. P. (2013). Social networking sites and older users–a systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics, 25(07), 1041-1053.Newman, G., Wiggins, A., Crall, A., Graham, E., Newman, S.

, & Crowston, K. (2012). The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 298-304.Sirriyeh, R., Lawton, R., Armitage, G., Gardner, P., & Ferguson, S. (2012). Safety subcultures in health-care organizations and managing medical error. Health Services Management Research, 25(1), 16-23.Stoughton, A. M., & Ludema, J. (2012). The driving forces of sustainability. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(4), 501-517.

Thamhain, H. J. (2013). Management of technology: Managing effectively in technology-intensive organizations. John Wiley & Sons.Wilkinson, K. M., Light, J., & Drager, K. (2012). Considerations for the composition of visual scene displays: Potential contributions of information from visual and cognitive sciences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28(3), 137-147.