A flying camera or a drone camera - Research Paper Example

Sergei concentrates more on the bright side of the picture in his video and can be seen proudly promoting his prototype camera. But, he does not talk some serious limitations associated with these cameras which many may be concerned with. This response paper aims to discuss the positive and negative aspects of Sergei’s ted talk. It will also explore how much room there is for more improvements in the area of flying cameras with the help of research literature. The applause heard during the video when Sergei uses a small device to raise the camera high up in the air shows how taken the audience is with his demonstration and ideas.

Sergei does not simply shoot arrows in thin air, but considers it critically valuable to also give a small demo to validate his talk. This action helps to acutely familiarize the audience with the product which the video is trying to promote. Another positive aspect of the video is that the presenter was lively and energetic. Words flew out of his mouth effortlessly and the points identified were briefly discussed, but in an animated fashion. There was a rigor clearly noticeable in the way information was presented to the audience.

Overall, it was like going on a riveting ride with the presenter because nothing seemed boring and unimaginative. The presenter digs with acute intelligence into his subject and certain intricate features were prioritized and talked about like what innovations went into the construction of the device. It is implied in the video that these little drones are capable of capturing amazing footage which shows why these things are rapidly becoming “today’s must-have photo accessories” (Kolonia).

Also, Sergei encourages his audience to be imaginative and creative in context of different ways in which the prototype camera can be used. Surely, there cannot be one way or one application for this device. For example, it can be used in wildlife field work.