Artistic Theories underlying Judgment of Good Art - Essay Example

Artistic Theories underlying Judgment of Good Art of Artistic Theories underlying Judgment of Good Art Introduction Art is considerably a form of expression that has allowed artists from all parts of the world to rejoice and express. However, the fact remains that not all artists can be given a place in the art cannon. Likewise other fields of sciences and social sciences there are chosen criteria in the field of arts as well that judge the work of artists as good in the contemporary art world. Among various artists who have contributed creatively within arts, Tracy Emin keeps an elevated space with her contributions of monoprints, paintings, neons etc. This paper aims to prove that Tracy Emin deserves a place in the art history canon. Herein, it should be noted that criteria of Claire Bishop, Jacques Ranciére, and Willi Bongard will be applied in this paper to assess the position of Tracy Emin. Artistic Theories and their Application on Tracy Emin’s Work As a matter of fact, various research works have been carried out in order to assess the impact that artists have made on the art market. At the same time, art market has been greatly impacted by demand of quality. It is due to this reason that a number of viewpoints were inhibited to assess and judge art work. Thus, the subjective nature of judgments is further questioned as far as dematerialization of arts is concerned. At this point, Claire Bishop’s criterion rather helps in judging a work to be good in the contemporary arts. Claire Bishop stated that any art work can be considered as good if only it tends to follow roots of aesthetics and it allows enough space that can help one argue and question. In addition, Claire Bishop also marked that a good work creates a hope for development anew. Claire Bishop, who is a well-known curator and art critic, maintains the viewpoint that art rather became a collaborative practice for most of the artist in the beginning of 20th century. It was the era when communism collapsed from the society. At this point, there was little or no difference between art and society itself. The criterion of Claire Bishop notes that there are two significant wings of art revolution. Firstly, it is the painting and sculpture that is being created for the need of art market while on the other hand; there are creative artists of the modern world who are able to undertake radical work. Bishop has been observed to call modern artists to be avante-garde. As per the analysis of Claire Bishop of a good art work, it comes to understanding that an art work needs to be defined within the context of aesthetes. In this case, Tracy Emin can notably regard as a generator of good art. It is because her artistic works including monoprints and neons have been defined from different aesthetes. There have been a number of illustrations and interpretations that have allowed Tracy Emin’s work to be understood for its approach of bringing change in the art work. In a summarized manner, it can be said that Claire Bishops’ view or judgment of good art finds defining meanings of art work within the context of aesthetes, collaborative in nature, ability to bring betterment in the future and leaves a space for reasoning. Not all of the above summarized technicalities of Claire Bishop are present in Tracy’s art contribution but rather major two technicalities exhibits her contribution as good in the contemporary art. In addition, another art theory which was put forward to judge art work was by Willi Bongard who is a German based art critic. Herein, it should be noted that Willi Bongard redefined art in order to give a basis for good art contribution. The definition as stated by Willi Bongard in his literature analysis states, “In a world where art is considered to be a product, we have to differentiate between good art and bad art, but even bad art is art”. The above noted definition points out that art is conceptual in nature. The conflict that arose is regarding the judgment that cannot be made anything which is conceptual in nature. In simple words, it can be said that Willi Bongard considers of judges an art work as good which is conceptually self-defining and includes innovation. This has rather been proven by other artists who claimed that creativity is another name of innovation. Applying the criterion of Willi Bongard, it comes to understanding that Tracy Emin’s work including her exhibition of neons in Miami is certainly an innovation which has increased fan following of Tracy Emin. Installations remain another wing of Tracy’s contribution to arts that is not just creative and innovation but also well-defined pieces. Furthermore, there are many other artistic theories that have been used over and over by the art analysts to judge art works as good for contemporary art. Among these artistic theories, Jacques Ranciére is remembered as a maestro of all theories for judgment of good art. Most notably, Ranciére divided art contributions into two phases where one is traditional aesthetic while the second is social interactions or modern aesthetic. Ranciére narrates these aesthetics to be layered where art challenges the observers to apply their thinking. At the same time, Ranciére has been noted to clarify the notion that radical art can never be compared with traditional aesthetics because there is a great deal of difference between those. It is due to this reason that art pieces of such kind (radical nature) are noticeable by mass art audiences. In other words, it can be said that an art pieces should be able to bring dreams, notions, considerations, coordination in society to life. This can only be done if the contemporary artists are able to bring innovation. Thus, it will not be incorrect to state that a collective view of good art in the minds of artistic theorists is of innovation, definition, and collaboration. Good art is, supposedly, a lens to look at the society in a collaborative manner where impossibilities can be overcome by being radical in nature. Creativity back then or in traditional times was accepted because those works were conceptual at that time and was exhibiting images and scenes which were different and new. However, reputation and tributes in the continual made artistic theorists call for new art thinking. Tracy Emin, following the view or criterion of Ranciére, tends to pose a new definition to art work. It has been done with the help of collaborative art that she undertook with other artist. Tracy defined her work with the help of assumptions which were brought to life. The artists work by Tracy Emin was numbered among those who influenced art greatly in British society. It was merely because she dared to come up with daring and innovative ideas to express her rejection of the system. Conclusion Through the above artistic theories by posed by Willi Bongard, Jacques Ranciére and Claire Bishop, it comes to understanding that a good art pieces in contemporary art world is that which comprises a touch of innovation or creativity. Definition of art is another collective aspect that has been noted in all the theories that were studied in the paper. The application of these artistic theories judges the work of Tracy Emin to be creative and innovation in nature. Overall, it can be said that neons, monoprints, installations etc. are all exhibiting a part in modern or contemporary art which remains radical in nature. However, there are some of the technicalities that remain absent in the work of Tracy but major element of innovation makes her art work to be good and worth including in the art cannon. Read More