Classical Theorists - Essay Example

ical theorists ical theorists Concerning administration, Woodrow Wilson believed that it was significant to establish a bureaucracy that would rule or administer autonomously from the elected governmental branches. According to Wilson, this implied that administration was obvious role of the government. In doing so, Wilson shades off the founding codes or principles of separation of powers and the consent of the citizens or the ruled from the emerging new way of administration. Wilson demanded a trained and skilled bureaucracy that has experience, will and knowledge to object popular opinion when deem significant (Cook, 2007).

Wilson did not believe in the principle of equality, implying that claims to superior wisdom cannot validate law or rule and that legalize government is based on the people’s consent. Wilson acknowledges that that expertise and skill is the title to govern or administer. Despite this, Wilson suggests that under certain circumstances and at certain times, certain systems in America will work. Wilson trusted in the expertise as the best way to administer which is coupled with a reflective of republican view of self-government (Cook, 2007).

Democracy has enlightened many people of the stubborn, ignorant, foolish, and selfish to people who emanate from distinct nationalities. Despite this, Wilson believed that there was still hope in that his aim was to champion for bureaucracy from wise and intelligent people, generate from them, and open for the people a bureau of economical, knowledgeable, and skilled administration. Wilson’s views on administration and politics were hard to sell to the American people because they preferred and believed in democracy.

Wilson believes that administration must be perceptive to public view. When assessing the dichotomy of politics and administration, Wilson argues that the establishment of a public office must be viewed as a public trust (Cook, 2007). Wilson’s views on an effective administration were based on the idea that trained and skilled servants would teach the people by enhancing public belief/views and thereby even governing them. Therefore, according to Wilson, the bureaucracy would educate and enlighten voters.

This implies that Wilson was more concerned about civil service, which he believed was self-sufficient and cultured to act aggressively, and in relate with the popular vote by ways of constant public advice and elections in order to attain arbitrariness of class struggle (Cook, 2007). Wilson’s approach to politics and administration was not ideal because it failed to provide a clear separation of powers of administrative agencies and the branches of government, which implies that one of them could affect the performance of the other.

Frank Goodnow mainly focused on politics and administration as descriptions and roles particularly focusing on what people consider the branch of administration. Further, Goodnow stressed that various institutions such as legislature, executive, or private institutions are all engaged in the implementation of the desire of the country. Goodnow believed that the role of politics in a state was to do with laws or policies in the implementation of the will of the nation. For Goodnow, administration mainly concerned the implementation of the law to ensure that the will of the nation is attained (Goodnow, 1905).

According to Goodnow understanding of politics, it was a manner in which the will or desire of the state is articulated while administration implied a range of techniques, measures, and methods via which the State’s role are conducted. Goodnow understanding of politics and administration was ideal and efficient as compared to Woodrow Wilson because the issue of separation of powers usually has a significant influence of practical utility in the working and functioning of public administrations in the U.S. Further, this authenticated the introduction of public service values and practice such as discipline, hierarchy, and efficiency aligned together to the egalitarian principles of the politics in America (Goodnow, 1905).

Therefore, unlike Woodrow Wilson, Goodnow trusted in the division of politics from administration because he believes it is significant to harmony between expression and implementation of the will of the nation. Goodnow advised that politics and administration must be willing to give up their autonomy in order to preserve and maintain this agreement. Goodnow argues differentiating politics from administration assists in shaping out the subject of independency for public institutions at a period when these administrative institutions were pressured to maintain and preserve professional standards in the face of immense pressure from corrupt party firms or companies.

Goodnow notes that failure to have clear separation of politics from administration; nation’s function will cease to work thus leading to a standoff (Goodnow, 1905). In sum, it is rational to state that it is not possible to have unpartisan approach to the issues of politics and administration. In order to attain efficiency, politics must be controlled over implementation of the desires of the nation. Both Woodrow and Goodnow ideas assisted in shaping the future of politics and administration in the U.S.ReferencesCook, B. (2007). Democracy and administration: Woodrow Wilsons ideas and the challenges of public management.

New York, NY: The John Hopkins University. Goodnow, F. J. (1905). The work of the American political science association: Proceedings of the American political science Association, 1904. Lancaster, PA:Wickersham Press.