StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Neural basis of game theory - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
The decision making process in the social groups consists of two distinguishing feature: being human factor, and the animal constant change of behavior to suit their physical and social behavior. The situation does not create room for behavior predictions in various…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.4% of users find it useful
Neural basis of game theory
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Neural basis of game theory"

Neural Basis of Game Theory Introduction The decision making process in the social groups consists of two distinguishing feature: being human factor, and the animal constant change of behavior to suit their physical and social behavior. The situation does not create room for behavior predictions in various circumstances; as the parties making the decisions are subject to change. In the cases of animals, it requires a highly adaptive decision making strategies for one to forecast various outcomes. Secondly decision makers can have favorites, in relation to consequences. This may result to bias decision towards one individual as opposed to the other, and hence select an action that will develop or degrade the well being of others. Various neurobiologists’ research employs the use of game theory to investigate the neural foundation of decision making; and proposes that the social characteristics of social decision making mirrors the purposes of the brain areas that responds to reward evaluation and reinforcement learning. The game theory appears as having evolutionary and growth stages that end up affecting the reasoning of different groups of people (Glimcher, 288).
Game theory situation involves the process of decision making, where the results depend on the choice made by the players in question. The word game comes from any occurrence with negative or positive outcomes influenced by the choice made by the player; while sometimes the decision is based on chance (Glimcher, 290).
Evolution of game theory
The game theory evolved from different studies done by different researchers over a period of time. In 1921, a French mathematician named Emile Borel, issued numerous papers tackling the theory of games using poker as exhibition. Later in the year 1928 another paper by John Von Neumann was published. Subsequently, the year 1944, John Von Neumann and Oscar Morgenstern collaborated and discovered the theory of games and economic behavior. There appears a significant level of growth in the theory of games when, Prisoner’s dilemma comes into play in the year 1950, which introduced the dominant strategy theory. The 1953 marks the introduction of the answer to non cooperative games which comes in play as a result of evolution of Nash equilibrium. In the years 1970, the theory gains extensive application and biology with the growth of evolutionary game theory. The year 2007 marks its extensive use in almost field for decision making intentions; the software that tracks down terrorists uses the theory of games (Glimcher, 305).
The assumptions of the game theory
The theory assumes that the player appears rational; acting without any influence. The players’ preferences influence the outcome of the game, yet individual players contribute partially to the results. Individual decision makers appear as a master of the game and his opposition (Glimcher, 315).
Classification of the game theory
The game theory is classified into -: single players and multi player games; cooperative and non cooperative games; symmetric versus asymmetric games; zero sum versus non zero sum games, simultaneous versus sequential games; cooperative and non cooperative games; symmetric versus asymmetric games; zero sum versus non zero sum games, simultaneous versus sequential games and the perfect information and the imperfect information (Glimcher, 318).
The single player situation occurs in the games against nature. The results and the players’ ultimatum depends on the player’s choice and strategy made by a totally indifference nature. The game against nature forms part of the decision theory; as opposed to game theory; since there appears only one player subject to independent choices and interested in the results (Glimcher, 334).
Multiple players, for example, the prisoner’s dilemma traveler’s Dilemma, the battle of the sexes, Dinners Dilemma, Rock paper, scissors, amongst others make independent decisions. In prisoners’ dilemma, both prisoners are guaranteed to fault regardless of, the actions of the other prisoner. Despite the fault, their efforts reward them of some sub-optimal input. The game occurs when prisoner B stays silent; he/she confesses, cooperates and defects. Prisoner A maintains quite, prisoner A is sentenced to 1 year. Each prisoner serves the sentence for one month and cooperates. Prisoner B is released; prisoner A confesses; he is set free and individual prisoners serve 3 month, defect, Prisoners B serves 1 year (Glimcher, 338).
In the battle of the sexes, a couple agrees to meet up at twilight yet, they have not agreed on the spot, and it appears impossible to communicate now. They have two choices; the opera and the football match. Their outcomes matrix can take the form of football by-Opera given Opera 3, 2, 1, 1 football 0,02,3 (Glimcher, 345).
In the dinners Dilemma situation, a grouping of persons decides to go out on a dinner together. They consent on splitting the bill cheque amongst themselves on equal terms. Each person is left with the decision to either make the orders on the expensive dish or chose the cheap dish. The allegations appear to favor the expensive dish over the cheap dish yet the price differential remains unjustified (Glimcher, 348).
The penalty in the dinner’s dilemma appears to add expenses an insignificant amount into their individuals’ bill. This way the group justifies the price of experience opt to a classic dinner experience. In assumption, this appears worse than a situation where each individual orders for their cheaper meals (Glimcher, 350).
There also appears two-player zero sum game named the rock, paper, scissors. In this game no matter the actions of the individuals players the mathematical probability of winning, drawing or losing appears exactly the same. The game possesses a dominant quality; where the same person always wins; and appears in the value revolve championships which take place annually. Child 2 rock paper scissors rock 0, 0-1, 1, 1. –Child paper 1, -1 0, 0-, 1 scissors rock 0, 0-1, 11,-10, 0 (Glimcher, 384).
Travelers’ dilemma situation case originally appears as the plans of Dr Kaushik Basu in 1994. In this situation, every player values their belonging for a price of any amount between $2 and $100. The travelers are refunded the lower amount of the two claims. The lower claimant is rewarded an extra $2 which is refunded by the highest claimant by imposing in him a charge of $2 (Glimcher, 390).
The travel dilemmas complexity exists; the independent strategy for the travelers appears as the claim for the lesser which appears as $2. In realism, people opt for $100, to show off their financial ability. The testing rewards individuals for averting from the Nash stability and acting in imbalance. The reality pauses questions; concerning game theory. Consequently, the reasoning of the super rationality originates from the idea. The argument presented by the theorist views that, under normal strategies, $100 appears as the best answer for the predicament (Glimcher, 408).
Strategies that appear applicable in the game theory involve the dominant strategy, which maintains no matter the efforts of the players. In the minimax strategy, the player aims at maximizing the minimum returns that he achieves. The collusion strategy occurs when the players decides amongst themselves to work together to maximize their total contribution. They operate on the policy of tit for tat; where a player receives an action and bounces back to the action. The backward induction occurs when the player bases his strategy on his opponent’s weakness and then reverts on the strategy. The Markov strategy the player founds their strategy on his present situation whilst ignoring the past experiences (Glimcher, 412).
Works Cited
Glimcher, P. W. Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain. London: Academic Press,
2008. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Neural basis of game theory Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1611831-neural-basis-of-game-theory
(Neural Basis of Game Theory Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1611831-neural-basis-of-game-theory.
“Neural Basis of Game Theory Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1611831-neural-basis-of-game-theory.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Neural basis of game theory

Game Theory

.... DECISION THEORY—ONE-PERSON GAMES Decision theory forms the basis of any kind of rational decision-making. In fact, decision theory is indeed the underlying basis of game theory, as well. When one is presented with a dilemma between several choices, the first thing that he has to do is first evaluate the utility, or relative value, of each possibility. At this point he can then select the best possible choice, which has the highest utility. Major difficulty arises when ambiguity is introduced. This comes from the fact that the person making the decision—for whatever reason—does not know the state of the...
12 Pages(3000 words)Research Paper

Economics game theory paper

...?The objective of the present paper is to model a situation of a consumer purchasing long term health care insurance using game theoretic tools. Before moving on to the specifics of the model, it may be useful to recapitulate certain aspects of the situation and related elements of consumer behavior under uncertainty and game theory to generate a better understanding of the model that is to be developed. We start off by noting the micro-economic aspects of the consumer’s problem. We consider a rational and intelligent consumer seeking to purchase insurance. An individual consumer’s action of purchasing insurance is motivated by the need to protect against probable unwanted future outcomes. Rationality is the first basic assumption... event...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Game Theory

...Game perfect theory of equilibrium Perfect game equilibrium is a more sophisticated method of the Nash equilibrium concept; this theory attempts to extend the spirit of Selten’s description of the sub-perfection to the games with imperfect information; in it broadest sense, it looks on the probability or chance of a person to win or lose when doing an assessment. It takes into account of two cases namely; normal form and extensive form as shone bellow (McCain 25). The normal form will always reveal that both (R, 1) and (W, q) which are Nash equilibrium. However, But the previous relies on the unbelievable threat by the player 2 i.e. 2 threatens to play q...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Game Theory

...? Game Theory Introduction Game theory can be simply referred to a tool for strategic decision making. In a narrow sense,game theory is a mathematical theory which is formed of games termed as zero-sum games. The paper ‘Theory of games and economic behavior (TGEB) published by Von Neumann is generally considered as the starting point of the game theory. According to the most extreme expression suggested by Aumann, “game theory is a sort of umbrella or ‘unified field’ theory for the rational side of social science, where ‘social’ is interpreted broadly, to include human as well as non-human players” (qtd in Schmidt 144). Game theory is mainly applied in areas such as psychology, logic, biology, economics, and political science... . This is a...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Intelligent systems - neural networks

... to learn unsupervised and without guidance, making them very capable. In addition Brains are able to accept ambiguity, to learn on the basis of very poor and disorganised data; at the same time as much more accurately formatted and structured data and rules are required by intelligent systems. Neural networks learn to carry out tasks and study data rather than directly being programmed to do so. Neural networks have the ability to 'learn' how to perform a task and so do not have to be directly programmed to carry out a task, thus removing the presence of a human expert. Neural networks take into consideration and concern the different factors that may affect the particular task and these factors can be used to make predictions... by the...
13 Pages(3250 words)Essay

Game Theory

...The paper explains the history and development of computer games. The paper traces the time when electronic games were first created on mainframe machines and how it gave rise to the gaming industry. The paper also describes the various phases, which marked the development of the industry, games that boosted its popularity among youngsters. Computer games are an intrinsic part of a youngster's lifestyle. With new advancements in technology, these games open a window to a world of fantasy, which enable people to assume various roles and undertake adventures denied to them in real life. However these games have an...
4 Pages(1000 words)Article

Game Theory

...Marriages and Game Theory The Game Theory is a knowledge-based technique used in everyday life as a means of devising strategies. Although the game is mostly used in the field of Economics to ensure that players are able to maximize decisions given a set of choices, the mathematical and logical applications of the techniques of game theory have been applied in other diverse fields and provide useful merits on which different people can make logical and rational decisions. In this respect, the techniques involve situations known as games, where the players are faced with problems on which strategies to...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Game Theory

...Question Scott Stevens identifies four major elements that constitute the principles ofthe game theory. These elements are players, actions, information, and payoffs (Tadelis, 2013). In this scene, outlaw Vizzini, talks to the masked man, who challenged him to the game of wits. The masked man is the former lover of Buttercup. By carefully analyzing this speech by Vizzini, we can find that the four elements of the game theory are there. In this speech, there are players, and in respect to Vizzini, the players are a clever man, and a fool. On this basis, this game of wits was between a clever man and a fool. Vizzini was...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Game Theory

..., “Game theory III: Folk theorem”). Game Theory has major contribution on repetitive games, wherein individual players have complete knowledge regarding the strategies of the other players. In Folk Theorem, there is a concept i.e. Nash Equilibrium. This concept is identified to have an outcome of one in a game, as the players are not facilitated with the opportunity of having an incentive by deviating from their choice on the basis of the choices of opponents. Contextually, players are not able to have incremental benefits, as others are identified to be grounded on their strategies (MIT, “Game...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper

Behavioural Finance as the Study of the Effects of Emotions

...as to how decisions are made, it is only fair that people understand, and follow NE findings. Proof offered by NE is enough to make people understand that without emotions an individual’s mind is not capable of making financial decisions (Faruk, p. 49). It helps to explain the decisions that are made in the world today. It helps one to know, and understand how these decisions affect the individuals making them, and all those around them. With a close look into how this research can help individuals make better financial decisions, the world’s economic problems would help to be solved, hence, improving many lives. Bibliography Camerer, C. F. Progress in Behavioural Game Theory. New York: Free...
7 Pages(1750 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Neural basis of game theory for FREE!

Contact Us