Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

Philosophy argumentive paper - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Capital punishment, also referred to as death penalty, refers to the permanent incapacitation of criminals through legal killing. It is not a new phenomenon unique to the contemporary society as…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.6% of users find it useful
Philosophy argumentive paper
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Philosophy argumentive paper"

Download file to see previous pages The Romans and Babylonians are also some of the ancient societies, which embraced death penalty as an unforgiving way of administrating justice in the society, as early as 1760 BC (Horne 11). However, the growth of democracy and human rights in the contemporary society has led to the challenging of death penalty as a tool for administrating justice. This paper is a critical evaluation of capital punishment as an effective way of apprehending criminals in an effort to reduce occurrence and reoccurrence of capital offenses.
Capital punishment is the most effective way of punishing capital offenses. To begin with, it is important to note that the aim of punishing crimes is to protect the society from perpetrators and also to ensure that victims are facilitated with consolation and retribution, necessary in assisting them to move on with their lives (Hugo & Casey 37). Murderers, for example, deserve an equal punishment owing to the fact that locking them in prison may not help to compensate the pain their victims go through, not withstanding the fact that there are possibilities of such criminals finding their way out, through parole, before their prison terms are over. This may be hurting for the victim’s family and friends, who would have to tolerate watching such a criminal walk in freedom whereas their own is already dead. In addition, this would subject witnesses in the case to unnecessary fear that the criminal may attack them as a way of avenging himself for the time he has spent in prison as a result of their testimony.
Imprisonment of convicted criminals does not always guarantee successful rehabilitation and therefore, there is always a high possibility of reoffending. As opposed to incarceration of criminals, capital punishment ensures that criminals are removed permanently from the society, thus making it difficult for them to engage in crime. Numerous cases of murder have ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Philosophy argumentive paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Philosophy argumentive paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from
(Philosophy Argumentive Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Philosophy Argumentive Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words.
“Philosophy Argumentive Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Philosophy argumentive paper

Argumentive Thesis

...?[Type the company IS GLOBAL WARMING A GENUINE THREAT TO THE PLANET EARTH? ARGUMENTATIVE THESIS [Pick the Is global warming a genuine threat to the planet earth? Introduction: Simply put global warming is the absorption of Sun’s infra red radiations by greenhouse gases in the earth’s atmosphere, resulting in an overall rise in the temperature of the planet; greenhouse gases being water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide ((IPCC, 2007). The concept known to every environmentally aware individual today and simple though it may sound, this is one of the least understood and most controversial issues today. First mentioned by Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius in 1896, its still not fully understood, the primary...
6 Pages(1500 words)Thesis

Philosophy paper

...To get to the Euthyphro dilemma, we have to go through the Definition Rounds of pious. Euthyphro cannot seem to define pious without giving empirical examples or what Socrates says "actions". If the first Definition round, he says that to be pious is to prosecute the one who commits a crime. This does not help as it never talks about the one who committed the crime. This is not acceptable as a man can be accused without being able to defend himself. In Round 2, we get closer to the second question. Socrates disagrees with Euthyphro's argument as the gods contradict each other. Their affiliation determines who they like and don't like. If Euthyphro says "What is dear to the gods is pious, what is not is impious" then it...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Argumentive Reserch Paper

...? Argumentative on the Learning Process Argumentative Research Paper The core business of learning is to impart learners with the relevant skills, knowledge and attitude. Effective learning process requires a good environment where both the learners and teachers can easily interact (Nunan & Lamb, 1996). It also requires the adoption and portrayal of some behaviors that are instrumental for the learning process. Apparently, these behaviors can be acquired if students are encouraged to develop the necessary social skills (Hon & Watkins, 1995). Some of the social skills include problem solving skills, communication skills, assertiveness skills and relaxation skills. Learners can acquire...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Philosophy Paper

...of such an argument necessarily is concentric upon the fact that there is no legal basis for the government/state to restrict an individual with regards to the substance that he or she chooses to engage. The fact of the matter is that the state/government or municipality does not have any directive or legal obligation to infringe upon such an area of personal responsibility as to what substance a given individual can and cannot be in possession of for strictly personal consumption. The second premise has to do with the level of freedom and responsibility that a democratic society purports to espouse. As such, if a democratic society encourages personal responsibility at the expense of promoting a litany of laws defining...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Philosophy Paper

... Plato’s Response to Aristotle’s Criticism and the Discovery of Oneness as an Inherent Feature of “Forms” How Plato would respond to Aristotle’s criticisms necessarily depends on two things; first, he would need to respond to the limitations of Aristotle’s objective knowledge about physical realities and secondly, he could explain how effectively his theory of knowledge provides solutions to those limitations. Even there is another option which Plato might adopt to answer Aristotle’s questions. That is, he could add some subsidiary traits to the ‘form’ and its cognitive conception process in man. In order to understand how Plato’s theory of knowledge explains the limitations of Aristotle’s concept of knowledge and reality... Plato’s Response...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Philosophy paper

..." as merely surfaces that have no inherent meaning; such philosophy would thus move "beyond good and evil"(SparkNotes Editors).The idea of free spirit and the will power to change static conditions seems more practical approach. The concept of order of rank is of wider acceptance as there is no universal principle of morality. What is considered right for one person may not be the same for the other one, also by restraining our instincts we are trying to become an over man, something beyond our thinking. On the contrary Rousseau’s arguments might be valid at the time of French Revolution but now things are way more different. We are living in an age where freedom of thought is given greater acclaim. His...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Philosophy Paper

...a revolution or any other political movement. The paper considers civil movement as portrayed in the Negro movement to point out the facts that renders it an ineffective revolutionary method. Martin Luther King clearly understood that civil disobedience is the open, nonviolent disobedience of the law and showing the willingness to adhere to the consequent punishments. However, not all resistances to the law that are nonviolent are civil disobedience. Considering that civil disobediences are generally illegal, the argument here is that some legal resistances are, as well, nonviolent and this does not make them civil disobediences. For instance, the Montgomery bus boycott in the 1956, was initially legal...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Philosophy paper

...Philosophical Proposition Philosophical Proposition All Men are Mortal Philosophical proposition refers to a logical argument which uses the principles of deductive reasoning based on premises in order to arrive at a certain conclusion. It is this conclusion which shows the position of a person regarding the argument. In philosophy, it is a common practice to formulate such propositions since it helps in resolving and answering philosophical questions which might otherwise remain unanswered. This paper argues in favor of the proposition that ‘all men are mortal.’ It does this by relying on two premises: a major and minor premises before reaching at one single conclusion...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Reflection paper: Asian Philosophy

...Reflection paper: Asian Philosophy Reflection paper: Asian philosophy The main objective of this paper is to write a reflection paper on Asian philosophy by analyzing Sadhana’s Pada’s book II which is talking about Yoga. The book is concerned with yoga’s practice. It states that yoga consists of three general practice: tupas, svadhyaya, and isvara pranidhana. Most of the people who practice yoga from western countries do it under the new age perspective (Pg. 132). The author argues that the success in yoga cannot only come about by practice of austerities, but it depends on the amount of effort being put into the practice. In connection to this, austerities can only be yoga if they are practice under some commitments. Therefore... , for a...
1 Pages(250 words)Article

Philosophy paper

...Bara William Philosophy 204 Oakland 3/21 Introduction The philosophy of mind studies the nature of mental phenomena such as thought, feelings, consciousness and perception and their relation to physical body, particularly the brain. The mental causation (mind-body) problem is one issue in the philosophy of mind which has been attracting debate among philosophers as to what really causes things to happen; mental properties or physical properties. What cannot be disputed is that we do cause things to happen; for example, our sensory perceptions tells us that we are hungry and we react by going for food or we usually walk to remain healthy. What is in question is whether it is the mind/soul...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Philosophy argumentive paper for FREE!

Contact Us