Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

Theory of Knowledge: When should we discard explanations that are intuitively appealing - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Intuitive decision making disconsiders using common sense because it involves additional sensors to perceive and become aware of the information received from outside. It will…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.8% of users find it useful
Theory of Knowledge: When should we discard explanations that are intuitively appealing
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Theory of Knowledge: When should we discard explanations that are intuitively appealing"

Download file to see previous pages I usually loved to spend my time in the beaches. On this day, however, my brother started fighting with me saying we will go to somewhere else instead of beach when we were about to leave for the beach, and due to this, my father become angry and cancelled the trip. This was the day when the tsunami had hit the shores of Chennai. Thus, my brother’s intuition saved our lives! What would have been the reason for this perception of him for insisting we do not go to the beach at the last moment? The next day I found an article about a 10-year-old British girl, Tilly Smith, whose geography lessons helped her save 100 tourists from a Thai beach1. In this case, it is rational thinking that came into play. Many scientists and wild life experts have noted that all the animals escaped from this Tsunami. Is this intuition that facilities animals with the remarkable ability to foresee the changes about to occur in nature? The scientific reason for the strange behaviour of animals before the tsunami struck was that they have keener senses compared to the human beings that about the impending changes in the sea, earth or air, which help them save them selves from earthquakes, tsunamis wild fives, thunder stems to.
My favourite subject is mathematics. Once, in my math class, when my teacher was teaching us about the imaginary number, ‘i’ (equal to square root of ‘-1’) by Euler, refused to agree with the concept as it had no convincing proof, for the existence of any imaginary number in particular. This is the formula initiated by Euler through his intuition. I was asking my teacher for the proof about the existence of the complex number. She asked me to think about proofs which contradict the existence of this particular number. Although there is also no proof for the existence of this number, there is no proof to contradict the same. This explanation appears reasonable and it convinced me. Even more, this intuitive ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Theory of Knowledge: When should we discard explanations that are Essay”, n.d.)
Theory of Knowledge: When should we discard explanations that are Essay. Retrieved from
(Theory of Knowledge: When Should We Discard Explanations That Are Essay)
Theory of Knowledge: When Should We Discard Explanations That Are Essay.
“Theory of Knowledge: When Should We Discard Explanations That Are Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Theory of Knowledge: When should we discard explanations that are intuitively appealing

Theory of knowledge

...? And is justification of beliefs internal or external to an individual’s mind. In order to understand what entails knowledge, it is vital to discuss knowledge from a propositional point of view also referred to as knowledge that. This kind of knowledge is different from acquaintance knowledge and knowledge how. For instance, in Mathematics, it is known that 1+1=2, but there also knows how to put the two numbers together, one arrives at the answer. Therefore, it is important to make distinction between knowing that, how and acquaintance knowledge. Traditionally, there existed two methods to theory of...
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay

Platos Theory of Knowledge

...of an explanation of definition has been provided of it. The theory of knowledge being justified true belief says that if one is to know that some scheme is indeed correct, the person should not just simply think it to be true but he should be having a logical excuse for that. One effect resulting from such an idea is that one would not be gaining knowledge simply because he believes something that was true. Platonic Version Plato’s theory of knowledge has been given in Theaetetus and it proves to be a substitute to the theory that Protagoras had proposed. Plato’s theory...
8 Pages(2000 words)Term Paper

Greek myth

3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Platos Theory of Knowledge

...a mistake, you will doubtless correct me. SOCRATES: We will, if we can. THEAETETUS: Then, I think that the sciences which I learn from Theodorus-- geometry, and those which you just now mentioned--are knowledge; and I would include the art of the cobbler and other craftsmen; these, each and all of, them, are knowledge. SOCRATES: Too much Theaetetus, too much; the nobility and liberality of your nature make you give many and diverse things, when I am asking for one simple thing. THEAETETUS: What do you mean, Socrates SOCRATES: Perhaps nothing. I will endeavor, however, to explain what I believe to be my meaning: When you speak of...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Theory Of Knowledge

...THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE There are several different aspects of the changing position of religion in our society at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Firstly, whereas at the end of the Second World War 'religion' in western societies generally meant Christianity, that is no longer the case. As a result of the large migrations, which have taken place since the ending of the colonial period, there are now large numbers of Moslems, as well as Hindus, Sikhs and adherents of other Eastern religions in Western Europe. In the United States there are huge numbers of 'Hispanics' from Central and South America. There are large numbers of adherents to a wide variety of 'New Age' religions. In Europe an...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Theory of Knowledge

...Theory Of Knowledge Introduction Theory of knowledge deals with a topic which has a doubt. Human psychology accepts things only when they are proved.A well defined knowledge about a topic is essential. Knowledge about a particular theory requires them to believe on that. Logic should be properly described so that it can be used to prove other concepts. Knowledge that is undefined cannot be treated as truth and it is not useful. Data must be supported by proof which can be done using the respective logic. (Schonfled 1987). This proved data has to be applicable in all situations where the concerned knowledge is imparted. An inference to the proven theory is necessary, as it can be used for rectifying the problems in future. Existing... ...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Theory of Knowledge

...Theory of Knowledge Introduction Words are more false as well as powerful than we think. In this essay I shall evaluate how language plays an important role in gaining knowledge to extent to which the characteristics Sartre claims for words have an effect on - negatively or positively different areas of knowledge ( AOK). Knowledge claims must be supported by reason, or the knowledge claim does not have a basis to be truly considered knowledge. It can be regarded as a number of other things, such as a feeling. The dependence on reason is varied between areas of knowledge, as reason is...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Theory of knowledge- When should we discard explanations that are intuitively appealing

...things to do. For example, more often we make friends just on the basis of intuition. When we come across a situation that requires us to select a friend, we blindly follow our intuition based on the self made criteria that we have set for them in our subconscious. Another knowledge issue that arises here is: Should we discard those intuitively appealing explanations that are influenced by our emotions? What effect emotions have on our selection process? David Gal and Derek Rucker, from Northwestern...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

When should we discard explanations that are intuitively appealing

...purely on feeling, otherwise called ‘guts’, or to just ignore it and go for the hard facts. Thus, there is a question whether we should discard explanations that are intuitively appealing or not. According to Gillman, in his book of luck, he speaks of intuition being in support of reason and without working against reason at all (20). In saying so, we can choose to retain explanations that are intuitively appealing. There have been cases where intuition has proved to be the friend of reason but still it falls short of what it actually...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

When should we discard explanations that are intuitively appealing

...When should we discard explanations that are intuitively appealing? In reference with the research from different philosophers, intuition is a key source of confusion to human beings. However, it acts in our favour, while in other times; it acts against the will of individuals. If we can try to argue to derive the meaning of intuition, this is a thing that is known to be like instinctive feeling other than conscious reasoning. Different individuals argue that dependence on intuition is not recommendable, despite the fact that it is always accurate....
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Theory of Knowledge: When should we discard explanations that are intuitively appealing for FREE!

Contact Us