Is There a Smarter Way to Approach IT Governance - Case Study Example

The Weill and Ross model of IT Governance has the following governance styles: Business monarchy, IT monarchy, federal system, IT duopoly and anarchy. Under business monarchy, it is the business executive, or a group of business or group of business executives including the CIO, makes all the IT related decisions for the enterprise. In an IT monarchy, those decisions are made by an Individual IT executive or group of IT executives. In a federal system, the C-level executives and business representatives for all the operating groups collaborate with the IT department.

This is equivalent to central government and the states working together. In IT duopoly, a two-party decision making approach which involved IT executives and group of business leaders representing the operating units.1 In a feudal system, business unit or process leaders maker separate decision on the basis of the unit or process needs. The most decentralized is anarchy, in which each individual user or group pursues his or her own IT agenda.2 The five decision areas the need to have an organizing model as basis for deciding where a company should adopt a centralized, decentralized or hybrid approach.

Another area I on investment as to know what should the company invest into including of course amount to invest. Another area is on architecture as to guide a company’s emphasis whether it is stability or flexibility. Determining the degree of applications to be externally purchased or internally developed and deciding whether on the kind of ERP application whether single or multiple applications. The fourth area is on standards, to help a company decide which components of technology it should standardize and the level or kind of standards to adopt.

The last area is on resources to be utilized and finding source of these resources Based on the foregoing, Alcan appears to