The Main Association with Social Policies - Essay Example

Introduction The concepts that are associated with the Labour Government have promised a variety of alternatives that are a part of the new changes.There are a variety of changes which have been made with the Labour Government, specifically which have began since the 1960s. The changes have consisted not only of basic alternatives but also with policy changes for social needs. The social policy that took place from 1964 – 1970 were based on changing the needs from the Labour Government and what was occurring during the time frame. Although there were changes which were made during this time, there wasn’t enough delivered with social policy. The lack of delivery and the inability to create the necessary changes to those who were interested in social policy was one which led to expected alterations; however, this changed to theoretical alterations instead of practical solutions for the country. Changes in Social Policy from 1964 – 1970 The social policy which took place in the 1960s was based specifically on the alterations which were happening in society and the need to alter what was occurring with the economy and political status. The economic and political alterations led to welfare states that needed to be approached, specifically with the social beliefs that were from the lower class. The social constraints which followed the economic and political status were consistent with unequal rights which were taking place in the work region and which were based on the need to change the status of those in society. The movement from industrialization and into the modern era was the main force which caused the social rights to become a part of the economic and governmental association. The shocks which were occurring during this time led to a combination of economic and social changes, all which were meant to redefine the status of individual’s within society while promoting equal rights within the nation (Scharpf, Schmidt, 2000: 19). The main association with social policies that were created during this time was a bridge to the modern belief systems that are currently a part of the governmental and economic order. From the 1960s to the 1980s there was a third order and second order change which occurred. The policies were based on taking basic human and social rights and moving them into the main institutions, specifically to protect the rights of workers in the region. The change was one which pushed to develop new tools that would enhance the human rights of those in the work space while adding in goals and alterations for the social movement that was a part of the time frame. These orders including making several social shifts within institutions and in society at general, specifically so worker rights and policies would be available within the work space. The result was one which was based on policy frameworks that could continue to evolve and remain as a main implementation with personal institutions within the region (Oliver, Pemberton, 2007: 2). Social Classes and Policy The main change which was associated with the policies and which remained the goal with the social development was with the need to change the social class in the region. The prevailing beliefs in the region were based on offering better social status and opportunity to those which had a higher development in economics. For institutions and work areas, this meant that those who came of a certain social class were automatically rejected from the industrial work and opportunities which were available. For the government, this change was the main focus, specifically with the movements of equal opportunity becoming more prevalent in the region. The problems continued with more conservative ideologies that split from the needs of alternative social classes and which caused an imbalance in powers. The alteration was to create more constitutional variations with the available opportunities while lessening the gap that was a part of the social – class belief system. However, the result was one which only led to alterations in the Labour Government votes and the proportions and divisions in social class. At the same time, this recognition began to cause more recognition of the Conservative and Liberal governmental policies while widening the gap between social orders to create a different association with those who were associated with social policies and governmental beliefs (Anderson, Heath, 2000: 125). The changes which were made with the social policies are one which was known to create a sense of social democracy. The divisions of social class were recognized before this time. However, the social policies of 1964-1970 altered this by highlighting what existed with the understanding that it needed to change. The main functioning led to the ideology of a social democracy, which was associated with both internal and international constraints within society. The change into the social democracy was then juxtaposed with the Keynesian macroeconomic policy that began to emerge in the 1960s. This then led to the need to have more participants in the social and economic structure that were from alternative classes, specifically with diversity as the main ideology for the internal and international movement forward within the nation. It is noted that since the 1970s, the social democratic ideologies and the links to the social policies that reflected this has caused a diminishing effect. The social policies have led to more problems with the same structure which existed before this time while complicating the capitalistic ideologies and institutional recognition of social policies. The internal and international policies then led to complexities that caused a reversal of the problem instead of helping with the social needs of those within the country at the time (Callaghan, 2002: 429). Social Divisions through Policy The divisions which were created through ideologies of social policy and what was occurring within democracy led to specific social divisions through the policies created. This led to even more complexities, instead of helpful solutions that were a part of the government and economic status. This not only affected the social status as a whole but also segmented different populations with the institutional and economic alterations which were occurring at the time. A social status which reflected this was with the status of women and the expectations which were arising during the time, specifically with contributions to the economy that was occurring during the time frame. Restructuring the status for women was one which was based on those who were in a welfare state and which required work but didn’t have as many choices because of status and implications of gender before this time frame. While this offered more women positions and opportunities, the economics for women didn’t begin to change as much. More important, the institutions and those working within the economy weren’t able to change the social status because of other complexities with women from before the 1960s. Even though the social policies have some alterations into modern times, the time frame of 1964-1970 was unable to implement and create more solutions for those within society (Edgell, Duke, 1983: 357). The changes which were made toward gender were initially made to assist with the social status with those who were a part of the main turning point of the time. This was combined with civil rights, basic human rights changes and the recognition of gaps within the social order. Reflecting this economically, politically and within the institutions became the main agenda of those who were associated with the government. However, there is now recognition that gender differences were based on oppression of the past which needed to be changed. When this went into the social policies and equal rights, it created more complexities with needs of gender and other associations of the time. When the policies were implemented it tried to change the gaps and divisions. However, the past associations that were made with inequalities and social class prevailed while creating a sense of civil service in institutions and within the economy. The lack of economic management and recognition which followed caused for the inability for the gender gap and other formats with the social policies to be implemented practically. Instead, this led to the inability for those who didn’t have the privileges to become divided while having a sense of deprivelege when difficulties with social status divisions arose (Pierre, 1995: 92). The Opening of Class Politics The social policy and the expectation that divisions would be altered with the changes have led to newer class politics that are continuing to shape into new problems. The year of 1964 was noted to be one which was based on the social class and the effects which were associated with this. However, this was divided specifically by the movements of the time and the political parties which began to pressure and move society in alternative directions for various rights. The economic pressures were the basis of this and led to the changes which occurred. The class politics which arose at this time were then based on the division in parties and the economic structure that was associated with this. The concept was furthered with the lower and middle class dividing because of the social movement to gather more rights and to have equal opportunity within the work place. The pivotal moments were then able to maneuver the social policies and the changes which occurred. However, the movements after this divided into class politics in which the governmental bodies in power favored one class and led to divisions in other manners, as opposed to being able to reflect the necessary changes which were a part of the initial goals of social policies which were created (Andersen, Yang, Heath, 2006: 215). The class politics which arose from the initial policies then led to an alteration in how the government functioned. The change was one which enhanced the class politics and the divisions instead of enriching the social policies which were used with the development of institutions in the country. The ideology changed from social policies to stimulate the economy and to change the main structure of institutions and developing equality and civil rights in the country. The main association developed into an alteration of trying to find a way to enhance the social divisions so political trust could be gained. The agenda moved from social policies and equality to one which was associated with changing public opinion and the votes which were needed to gain political power and a stronger reputation. The association was to create a sense of cooperation which occurred with the representatives of social classes and the political bodies which supported various policies and procedures for representing lower classes. The result is that the class division remains within institutions and economically while political bodies are able to create a different association with the class politics, specifically to continue to recreate the trust which is needed to gather political power (Levi, Stoker, 2000: 475). Development of the New Labor Policy The newer changes which have occurred from social policies which were developed from 1964 – 1970 have led into the modern association with the policies and what is now occurring. The New Labour Policy is the development from the changes which occurred from the time frame developed. Trends and changes in economic policies are now altering the way in which policies for social order are being created. The concept of pre – Keynesian policy making is one which is now being looked back on for the newer policies, specifically because of the separations which have occurred since this time frame. The understanding of price policies, inflation, movements into globalization and structures which are altering are all adding into the Labour Policies and how this affects the social order. While the divisions with social order are now a part of the main association, there is a continuous sense of changing trends within the economy. The replacement is now associated with the neo – liberal economic policies that are occurring and the development into the social policies and structures that are being developed. The result is the inability to offer or change the social policies which have already been created while recognizing that the developments with the Labour Government have created more division and have structured the political movements that are associated with the institutions (Wilkinson, 2007: 817). The changes in social policy and the new expectations as well as the need to restructure are one of the many reasons why there is an understanding that the changes from 1964 – 1970 no longer were effective and didn’t deliver the promises for social reform. The concept is one which has now led to a third way that is in demand for policies. The concept of The Third Way was developed by the Labour Government when the failures of the social policy took place. Today, the government is looking at not only the demand for social restructuring. There is also the movement into the foreign politics, globalization and the need to confront the different formats of social policy and governmental forms. The complexities which are now arising have developed into more complications of what social policy is supposed to be inclusive of and what this identifies. The changes show that the social policy, for the current times, is still leading to the same complexities and associations with those who are in need of reform. The changes which have occurred are now leading to an understanding that the policies of the past didn’t change what was needed. Instead, it caused more gaps and divisions with the inability to change the current structure. The current economic and political association has now complicated this into a New Labour Government that is created from the current needs (Little, Jones, 2007: 34). The changes which have been made and the difficulties that have occurred have now led to not only a question of the social policies and classes that have been implemented from 1964-1970. The alterations have now led to questions over the morality that has developed since this time, specifically in terms of human rights. The objectives for human rights is one which was based on creating equal opportunity for those in the country while developing more for every individual that was a part of the needed status. The human rights were furthered with an understanding of the development the government had in terms of executing foreign policies and what this meant in terms of human rights. The need to execute the right social policies is one which is now based on morality, as opposed to the commitments to the economy and internal structure. The movement into the internationalization has led to an understanding that the social policies need to be refined according to morality and ethics. This term of equality differs from the past, specifically in terms of economy and development of industry that was a part of the implementation from 1964-1970. To completely move toward this change, there is an understanding that the policies were ineffective and didn’t reach the goals of offering more opportunity and equality to all that were in the state (Little, Jones, 2007: 39). Each of these components has been furthered with new questions of what social policy can do and whether morality, social class and status can be altered when looking at economy and government. The legislation from the New Labour Government is now based on the contemporary issues with division. The internal components of this are based on racism, gender differences and the inability to alter these because of the past social class that was recognized. The complexities are furthered with moral questions which are taking place with relationships that are occurring overseas. The recognition that is occurring with the New Labour Government is now associated with the need to change the trends in what social class and division means. The challenge is based on how this relates to economy and what lack of rights has occurred with the attempts to reform the main policies of the time. The wider changes are continuing to create alterations and developments. However, these are being altered further by the political agenda and the association with international trends. Questions are now arising in terms of immigration and migration, separation of social class that continues between countries and developments based on policy that are unable to create current developments and needs with the changes and fluctuations both politically and economically (Bowser, 1998: 158). The lasting impression that now challenges the New Labour Government is based on the ideologies of economy and how this relates to the development of social classes. While the policies tried to take away divisions from institutional and economic perspectives, the divisions only fluctuated into classes based on economy. The challenge is now toward ways to modernize the problems with the economy and how this will be associated with other needs. Furthermore, this is developed with an understanding of the ideologies of modern capitalism and how this alters the structure with social policy. The development of new policies now has to consider differences with the economic and political structures between territories and how these create the social classes, as opposed to it becoming from the cultural order of the time. The result is the alteration of agendas and trying to take more radical moves because of the lack of development which occurred from the past social policies (Tomlinson, 2004: 685). Conclusion The concepts which occurred from the Labour Government from 1964 – 1970 were one which set goals and was working to change the structure of social class. The association was combined with policies set in phases to work with the economy and institutions for the change. However, it is now being noted that the changes during this time were only theoretical but were unable to create the right alternatives for those within society. The result is the inability to create and implement policies and structures which are just and which fulfill the main agenda of the Labour Government. Today, this is seen with the internal and international developments, clashes which continue to occur with social policies and complexities that are continuing to arise and question morality in relation to the labour offered. For those working from an alternative social class is the inability to have the needed options and offerings within society and from what is being made available to those currently working with the policies offered by the Labour Government. References Andersen, Robert, Anthony Heath. 2000. “Class Matters: The Persisting Effects of Contextual Social Class on Individual Voting in Britain: 1964-1997.” European Social Revolution 18 (2). Andersen, Robert, Min Yang, Anthony Heath. 2006. “Class Politics and Political Context in Britain, 1964-1997: Have Voters Become More Individualized?” European Social Revolution 22 (2). Bowser, Benjamin. 1998. Racism and Anti – Racism in World Perspective. UK: Sage. Callaghan, John. 2002. “Social Democracy and Globalization: The Limits of Social Democracy in Historical Perspective.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4 (3). Edgell, Stephen, Vic Duke. 1983. Gender and Social Policy: The Impact of Public Expenditure Cuts and Reactions to Them.” Journal of Social Policy(12). Levi, Margaret, Laura Stoker. 2000. “Political Trust and Trustworthiness.” Annual Review of Political Science (3). Little, Richard, Mark Jones. 2007. New Labour’s Foreign Policy: A New Moral Crusade? New York: Manchester. Oliver, Michael, Hugh Pemberton. 2007. “Learning and Change in Twentieth – Century British Economic Policy.” UK: London School of Economics. Pierre, Jon. 1995. Beauracracy in the Modern State: An Introduction to Comparative Public Policy. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Scharpf, Fritz, Vivien Schmidt. 2000. Welfare and Work in the Open Economy. UK: Oxford University Press. Tomlinson, Jim. 2004. “The Labour Party and the Capitalist Firm.” The Historical Journal (47). Wilkinson, Frank. 2007. “Neo – Liberalism and New Labour Policy: Economic Performance, Historical Comparisons and Future Prospects.” Cambridge of Journal Economics 31 (6). Read More