Governments and Gay Marriage - Essay Example

In marriage, the bodies and souls must be of a girl and a boy, and not of two boys or two girls. In gay marriage, often the interests of the persons involved are considered and the greater interest of the society and religions are overlooked. For, gay marriages cannot fulfill the ultimate aim of marriage- to give birth to new generations.

Governments are now-a-day issuing licenses to same-sex married couples as the first step of approving their relationship. Moreover, in 2006 the New Jersey Supreme Court ordered to allow same-sex married couples to civil unions, ensuring state-level spousal rights that couples of the opposite sex would enjoy under the same legislation. In May 2008, the California Supreme Court made a ruling that same-sex couples have the right to marry. But, Proposition 8 was passed banning gay marriage in California in November of the same year. Early in October 2008, the Connecticut Supreme Court made a verdict that a ban on same-gay marriage is a violation of the equal protection clause under the state constitution and it became the second state to give legitimacy to it. In April 2009 Iowa Supreme Court accepted it followed by Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine bringing the number of states to approve gay marriage to six. The ruling of the federal district judge in California made it clear that proposition 8 apparently violated some of the provisions of equal protection of the US constitution. Recently in June of this year, the New York assembly passed legislation in favor of same-sex marriage. (“Same-sex..”).

One of the vicious effects of gay marriage would be that it can lead us to polygamy and “polyamory” where a person will have more than one spouse or physical relation with many at a time (Kurtz). If gay sex is legalized the polygamists and cohabiting relatives and friends as well suited for their recognition. Such an incident will question the legacy of the institution of marriage and a flexible contracting relation will come in place of marriage.

There is not a single valid reason to establish same-sex marriage as legitimate. On the other hand, facts oppose it many. There are certain complementary aspects to men and women that constitute the pith of marriage that go beyond the physical aspects. There are some needs for men that can only be provided by women and for women which can be satisfied by men. In same-sex marriage, a woman’s innate desire to bear children does not come to reality. Here, marriage as a social institution becomes a mockery. Even if the gay couple adopts a child, he or she does not thrive fully as a grown-up by a father and mother. Evidently, children do well when growing up in an opposite-sex married couple.