Evaluate a classic study in psychology - Essay Example

Classic studies have been conducted to reveal the reason for the variations in accuracy of numerical detail regarding an event, particularly if it is tragic in nature like an accident. Interestingly, the variations observed in the different accounts seem to be dependent on some factors which influence the narrators’ judgment. In this study, one of such factors has been discussed to demonstrate the extent of influence by variables on the recalling of details resulting in reconstruction. According to Gruber and Goschke (2004), human cognition processes incorporating language and memory are complex behavioural and functional processes.

In the findings, the authors reported that the human working memory can be divided into two systems distinguished from each other by their neuro-anatomical organization as well as by their evolutionary origin. In this work, it is admissible that the biology of the brain is behind the apparent disconnection between the language and memory of an event. The fact that there exists some division of the brain memory system, as occasioned by the anatomy and evolutionary functionality of the systems acts as a pointer that the human brain is prone to functional disjunctions.

Reported details of an incident are therefore subject to the efficiency of the two systems of brain functionality, which evidently have some disconnection. To support this argument, Gruber and Goschke postulated that the two systems relied on different networks; one that supports and mediates attention while the other mediates language functions. It has been found out that the control of these two systems is done from different centres; one prefrontal parietal and temporal systems dealing with behaviour while the other is controlled by the left hemisphere premotor and parietal region and largely directs language. Language