This is because terrorism has varied repercussions and effects on the people in distinct regions of the world. Some believe terrorism is when huge bombings and firing incidents take place while others realize…
Download file to see previous pages...
Due to the consequences attached with terrorism, one can understand that mankind has suffered on nearly all counts. If suffering is the barometer of finding out how terrorism will be defined and described, then one can suggest different implications all the same. It is not surprising that ever since recorded history, terrorism has been hard to define. It is both a strategic tool and a tactical entity, whereby the some believe it as a holy duty while others as a crime in its most rigorous form. Some believe it is the best deterrent to oppression and thus stands as a justifiable excuse in the wake of changing times. Then there are others who believe in creating destruction within the society to meet some of their ulterior motives whilst indulging in terrorism and its related activities. This indeed is a state of mind which comes directly linked with terrorism.
It remains a reality that terrorism is a crime which influences an audience apart from the victim that is apparent. The basic strategy of terrorism is to commit to those acts which come under the domains of violence and thus grab the attention and feedback of the population which is affected by the same. Often times, it has been seen that the local population is indeed the government of the land or even the entire world. The terrorists carry out the terrorism related activities to let the people know that a lot of ambiguity exists within the relevant ranks, and thus anarchy has started to come up as a major force. The manner in which the terrorism event takes place decides whether or not it has been instrumental at changing beliefs or aligning ideologies. These are some of the basic reasons why terrorism is seen as something that is hard to define and describe because it affects quite a few tangents in the long term scheme of things. The three different perspectives in the wake of the phenomenon of terrorism offer something of insight to gain from. This encompasses the stance of the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
To prevent the acts of terrorism, especially nuclear terrorism, law enforcement and intelligence agencies should define the scope of skills and resources needed to executive a successful attack, the signs and symptoms of an intention to conduct an attack involving nuclear materials, access and availability of nuclear weapons among terrorist groups, as well as the locations that are most likely to be targeted.
The reason for these differing definitions of the word terrorism stem from the fact that is an incredibly emotionally and politically charged word which many suggest is used only in a xenophobic context. The purpose of this paper is to cover some of the controversies and debates surrounding the use of the word terrorism in a number of context to highlight some of the difficulties in defining and using this word.
TERRORISM. This paper is dedicated to the reasons that made extremists blow an attack on the USA. Moreover, it looks into the case trying to consider the USA to be not the offended but the offender. The USA has been one of the dominant countries on the world arena for more than 100 years.
Are there any policy measures that can be put in place to mollify the Muslims? And should the west consider what the Muslims think despite the cultural differences? This paper seeks to answer these questions. Discussion It is first important to note that Muslim as a religion do not permit terrorism (Esposito, 2011).
The phrase in the book “Harry’s Game” is often quoted when analyzing such distinctions. Seymour writes, “one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter” (Seymour). However, Daniel Larison sees this phrase as a cliched one, since it undermines the political reality that often groups fighting for a noble cause can employ tactics that spread terrorism (Larison).
A terrorist is first moved by his/her own psychological underpinnings, and then indulges in such acts that have an adverse impact upon the society. The terrorist might behave in such a manner so as to take revenge from the society
In August 1983, James Morris after being discharged from Marines stole a large number of helmets, military uniforms and other armed equipment (Hamm, 2007). On August 9, 1983, the CSA did an arson attack on
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Assignment on topic Terrorism for FREE!