Download file to see previous pages...
Frye v United States ruled on in 1933. In this case, Frye was convicted of 2nd degree murder. Attorneys for the defendant proposed an expert witness to testify as to results he discovered using a ‘deception test’, which is similar to modern day lie detector tests. The expert witness elaborated on how blood pressure is monitored by this device. The expert felt that scientific experiments showed that negative emotions, such as fear or anger, produces a rise in blood pressure. The expert then deduced that the same would occur for someone who is lying, since there would be a fear of detection of the lie. It was further reasoned that speaking truth would be natural, and so no emotion such as guilt or fear would enter the picture, and hence no rise in blood pressure. (FRYE V UNITED STATES)
The Supreme Court ruled that there is a difference between (1) expert testimony gained through training and lengthy work experience in the field versus (2) expert testimony that is based on experimental research that has not yet gained solid scientific backing in the science community at large. As a result, the proposed testimony of the expert was not upheld as admissible evidence (FRYE V UNITED STATES). The ‘Frye Standard’ thus became a well known basis for future court cases to allow scientific techniques as admissible evidence only if it is already ‘generally accepted’ in the relevant scientific community.
The second case is Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (DAUBERT V MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS, INC) Daubert was a 1993 product liability case where the Supreme Court had to determine what type of scientific evidence is admissible in court. Daubert sued Merrell Dow due to birth defects that occurred in two of their children. The mother was taking the drug Bendectin, which was manufactured by Merrill Dow.
Science did not provide a direct link between the drug and any birth defects. Statistical data was proposed as an alternate solution, but
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Court cases Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1569471-court-cases
(Court Cases Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Court Cases Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1569471-court-cases.
Moving to Texas, their marriage was invalidated because it is against the Texas Ordinance. The issues presented in the present case is whether the marriage of Susan and Mary is invalid because it is against Texas Ordinance and whether or not fundamental rights of Susan and Mary are violated by the Texas Statutes.
It is based on the representative constitutional democracy in which there are three co-equal branches of government. The basic foundation of this concept is the check-and-balance in governance so that no person or group of persons can manage to retain too much power to prevent any abuses.
Existence of many sources of law however leads to dissent judgments that may be reversed on appeals. While judges and magistrates in lower courts may offer unitary judgments as they may preside over cases as single judges or magistrates, decisions in the Supreme Court are made on majority votes of presiding Supreme Court judges.
He filed suit demanding compensation in damages for amounts greater than $50,000, under strict product liability as well as for breach of implied warranties of fitness and merchantability of the product. Target moved the case to the present Court on the
The question remained; did the school snatch the right to have religious liberty from students by enforcing public prayer? Engel parents definitely believed so as they argued that there should be a separation of state and church based on the first amendment. The State of New York believed that it did not establish a religion.
discriminated against one of its senior employees, Bernadine Adams who was the Health & Wellness Director of the company’s Heritage club in Denver. Violating the Americans with Disability Act is a civil crime that just as the EEOC explains limits the
Outside the apartment, the police officers could hear screams and people arguing and after knocking Roxanne Rojas (Fernandez’s in-house girlfriend) opened the door. Roxanne appeared fleshly battered and was bleeding according to the police
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Court cases for FREE!