Download file to see previous pages...
The courts consider the best interests of the patients, and this situation can be seen in cases where the interests of the mother and her unborn child are involved. In the Re A case, the court opposed the wishes of the parents and held that a surgical operation was to be performed, so as to separate the conjoined twins1.The English courts have made it very clear that every individual is at liberty, under the common law, to accept or reject any kind of medical intervention, including surgery.
Medical practitioners are required by law, to comply with the ethics of the medical profession and to exercise considerable skill and competence in their work. If they fail to work in accordance with this legal duty, they will be deemed to have been negligent in their profession. Communication plays a central role in the medical profession. Therefore, medical practitioners should maintain adequate communication with other medical professionals2.
This is essential in cases entailing medical complications. The absence of such communication would result in poor deliverance of medical care to the patients. Moreover, doctors would be subjected to the allegation of clinical negligence, if there were to be inadequate communication between them. Similarly, doctors who fail to inform the dangers, inherent in the illness to the patient, are considered by the law to be negligent3. Such physicians will be prosecuted for negligence by the courts, if the patient files a case in this regard.
Blab performed an emergency operation upon Sophie, without her consent. She is a competent adult, and as she is vehemently opposed to any medical intervention, the question arises, as to whether Blab is liable for having provided the surgical intervention to her.
Patients can refuse medical treatment or surgery under the concept of freedom. However, their decisions will be valid only if they have the required levels of competence. If the patient
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Human Right and Health, is another course that teaches health workers the relationship between public health and human right, which focus on economic, social, and cultural rights that needs to be addressed while interacting with patients
Hospital and health care centers whether public or private are the next step for the health seekers (patients).
People rather than falling sick would work out different exercises in order to keep diseases away. There would be more physiotherapist's and physical trainers training people to keep their health fit. The role of physical trainers would be more in magnitude as compared to doctors thriving to cure diseases.
Since time immemorial, man’s quest has been to protect himself from forces of nature and other elements primarily against disease. Being a social animal, and to ensure congenial living along with fellow human beings, (s)he evolved a ‘law’.
As the report declares health care professionals are mandated to respect the patient’s autonomy in terms of allowing the patient to make his own decision with regards to his own preferred care and treatment. The patient should be properly informed with general information regarding the purpose and process of treatment.
These common laws were put into place in order to protect the healthcare professionals from frivolous lawsuits brought about by patients and at the same time, offers the patients a proper course of legal action
Under the Standard of care, reasonable and prudent implies doing that which the society expects those in a similar profession or with related qualifications in parallel localities to do when confronted by
This paper will examine caregivers’ acceptable actions in the event that they dispute wrong physicians’ written orders. Caregivers have the right to refuse certain physicians’ written orders, particularly in the event that they believe that the written orders are contraindicated, do not conform to accepted hospital protocols and procedures.
a baby’s life; securing the mental and physical health of the mother (from permanent injury); and the presence of substantial risk of the child being born with mental or physical complications or handicap. From the case provided, the Upmarket NHS Trust established that
Dr. Morgan’s client should imagine if she lost her husband or if he became redundant after the child was born they could still continue taking care of the child (CIBA Foundation Symposium 2009)
The law does not allow anyone to abort
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Medical Ethics and Law for FREE!