Nobody downloaded yet

Tort Coursework - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
It was his contention that he underwent post traumatic stress disorder, due to this incident. Subsequently, he killed a pedestrian, in a fit of rage; and pleaded manslaughter on…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.6% of users find it useful
Tort Coursework
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Tort Coursework"

Download file to see previous pages It was argued by Gray that he had been beset by these ills, as a consequence of the post traumatic stress disorder engendered by the negligence of the defendants2.
Gray’s claim was that in the absence of the defendants’ tort, he would not have been deprived of his earnings. Therefore, he contended that he had been put to a loss. Moreover, Gray claimed damages for the loss of earnings, prior to and subsequent to his killing of the pedestrian3.
The legal doctrine of ex turpi causa oritur actio implies that an illegal or immoral act cannot constitute the basis for a cause of action4. The courts are required to adopt a non rigid stance, whilst effecting the doctrine of ex turpi causa oritur action. As such, it is essential for the court to apply the test of public conscience. Hence, it should arrive at a judicious balance between the negative outcomes of granting relief against those arising from the refusal to grant relief5.
In Gray v Thames Trains Ltd, Lord Hoffmann stated that the maxim ex turpi causa was more of a policy than a principle. Moreover, such policy depends on a combination of several factors; which could vary, in accordance with the situation obtaining, in a specific instance6. Therefore, the court does not encourage a plaintiff to recover some benefit out of his own illegal act.
Gray’s capacity to earn had been rescinded, due to the imposition of the hospital orders. The House of Lords, opined that the award of damages to the claimant, in respect of the loss of earnings, for the period, during which, the latter had been subjected to the orders of the civil court; would be at variance with the policy, on which these orders had been made7. In this case the House of Lords analysed the issues relating to causation and public policy, with regard to psychiatric illness.
Lord Phillips had opined that ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Tort Coursework Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Tort Coursework Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1561599-tort-coursework
(Tort Coursework Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Tort Coursework Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1561599-tort-coursework.
“Tort Coursework Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1561599-tort-coursework.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Tort Coursework

Tort Law

...?I TORTIOUS LIABILITY OF ALEX A. Factual matrix material to the potential lis Alex is the source of information which prima facie appears to be defamatory (See infra), is false and published; 2. Alex has disclosed the information to Barbera (who caused publishing) without knowledge of the fact that the information will be published. Hence, the information disclosed was without an intention to publish. B. Analysis of applicable Tort law The potential liability can be imposed on Alex for defamation. Thus, it is relevant to analyse tenants of Law of Defamation in Tort in order to conclude Alex’s risk of potential liability. According to Winfield & Jolowicz (Tort, 17th ed. ; WVH Rogers ed),...
6 Pages(1500 words)Coursework

Law of Tort

...?Question Private Nuisance Winfield’s definition of private nuisance as the unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it1, captures the common law development of the tort of private nuisance. Professor Winfield’s definition of private nuisance is broad enough to cover an indefinite category of interferences with another’s use or enjoyment of land or rights in connection with it. In fact, Gearty describes the development of the tort of private nuisance as becoming increasingly “confusing”.2 However, an examination of developments at common law suggest that the courts have attempted to qualify the definition of private nuisance so as to ensure...
14 Pages(3500 words)Coursework

Law of Tort. Majrowski v Guys and St. Thomas NHS Trust. Rylands v Fletcher

...?Question A. Ben The House of Lords’ decision in Majrowski v Guy’s and St. Thomas NHS Trust establishes that an employer is vicariously liable for workplace bullying or harassment by one employee of another.1 Therefore Ben is at liberty to pursue a claim against X Ltd. in tort for Amir’s harassment provided he can substantiate the requisite elements constituting harassment. The fact that Ben complained to management in the past and after the incident in which he was locked in a store closet will not exempt X Ltd. from liability under the principle of vicarious liability. Despite a formal warning, the harassment continued. The fact is, an employer can be vicariously liable even if the employer is not aware of the harassment leading... the...
12 Pages(3000 words)Coursework

LAW OF TORT 2- DEFAMATION

...? Law of Tort 2: Defamation I. Introduction Everyone owes a duty of care to those affected by his or her actions and is liable in law for his or her negligence. Tort is the law that relates to civil wrongs, and in particular the laws relating to negligence. Defamation is a particular form of negligence which can be brought to the courts on the part of the plaintiff. Humphrey does not have a case for libel, because libel consists of printed lies or untruths. However, Humphrey may have a case when it comes to Rupert slandering him, since he spoke untruths to a public audience about Humphrey Fanny is not really liable for either libel or defamation because she only dictated what Rupert said. Here, the law of...
5 Pages(1250 words)Coursework

Law Of Tort

...Have we gone too far in Compensation proceedings? In the United Kingdom, law of torts has developed over time to include all sorts of claims. Various heads under which compensation would be claimed include negligence nuisance, assault and other actionable wrongs. The Liability of the defendants has increased dramatically in the past century because of inventions of new means of transport industrial advancements etc. Accordingly more and more people are now entitled to claim compensations for wrongs done to them regardless of the tortuous liability of the defendants. However jurists and social commentators note an increase in the tendency of claimants to claim damages for any injury to them caused by any action or any...
6 Pages(1500 words)Coursework

Love. Negligent Tort

...NEGLIGENT TORT 16 February NEGLIGENT TORT The term tort refers to wrongful acts, leading to legal damage, committed by one party to another. It falls under the scope of civil law with the foundation that every individual owes other people a duty of care. Negligence is a form of tort. This paper seeks to discuss concepts of negligent tort. The paper will discuss the elements of negligent tort and the available remedies for the tort. Elements of negligent tort Negligent tort is characterized by breach of a person’s duty of care, to others, and a subsequent legal injury caused by the breach....
2 Pages(500 words)Coursework

Tort Law

...be a remedy in contract, not in tort.2 Hedley Byrne changed this basic rule, and now parties may recover for purely economic loss, even if there is not a contractual relationship. The facts in Hedley are similar to the case at bar. In Hedley, Hedley Byrne was a firm of advertising agents with a customer, Easipower Ltd., who put in a large order. Hedley carried out this large order, but not before it got a report from the Heller & Partners Ltd. Bank regarding Easipower’s creditworthiness. The bank replied that Easipower was creditworthy, Hedley relied upon this statement, gave Easipower its orders, Easipower went out of business, and Hedley Byrne lost £17,000 on the deal. Hedley Byrne sued Heller & Partners for their...
10 Pages(2500 words)Coursework

Tort of Negligence

...Tort of Negligence Table of Contents With Reference To Taha And Relevant Case Law, Identify The Criteria That Need To Be Satisfied For A Successful Claim In The Tort Of Negligence. 3 2. How Might The Courts Establish Whether Mike Can Claim For Economic Loss Against Pitcher And Co. 4 3. Both Cases Are Referred To The Court Of Appeal. With Reference To The Court Structure Of The English Legal System, Explain Which Courts The Court Of Appeal Would Be Binding Upon. 5 4. In Deciding The Cases Before Them, Discuss Whether The Judge Can Depart From Previous Decisions Made In The Court Of Appeal. 7 References 9 1. With Reference To Taha And Relevant Case Law, Identify The Criteria That Need To Be Satisfied For A...
4 Pages(1000 words)Coursework

Real estate law- principles of tort

...WHY ARE THE PRINCIPLES OF TORT IMPORTANT TO UK LAND OWNERS? By + Affiliation Introduction According to Svyatoshnyuk A., (2014), a tort is a legal wrong for which the law offers a remedy. It is a civil action taken by an individual or citizen of a given country against another and is solved in court. A plaintiff is a person who suffers financial injury or sustains harm as a consequence of an unfair act of the other party (Kenny, 2015) Tort feasor or defendant is the person who incurs liability for damage he has inflicted or has made the plaintiff to incur. The law of torts is resultant of a web of common law doctrines. The principles have been derived from both...
7 Pages(1750 words)Coursework

Business Law Assignment

...for American companies operating in America or those operating outside America in a foreign land. The policy is indeed a good one as it protects all parties whether employer or employees. This ensures that none is discriminated against on these characteristics and that job recruitment is on the basis of competence. Question 3 There is privacy in the workplace, but this is only to an extent that it doesnt interfere with the main contract. The office is meant for only official duties related to the roles played by the office holder. Anything that raises the question of performance warrants investigation that of course may lead to a violation of the privacy (Ken, 2015). Question 4 The purpose of a modern tort law is to...
4 Pages(1000 words)Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Tort Coursework for FREE!

Contact Us