Download file to see previous pages...
Britain, Austria, Hungary, Russia, France, Prussia and the Ottoman Empire were the major players in the Vienna congress whereas U.S, France, Germany, and Britain were the major countries involved in Versailles peace process. Vienna congress was successful in restoring the balance of power in Europe whereas the Versailles treaty failed to achieve that. Both the treaties were aimed at rebuilding of the Europe after a frightening war.
One of the major differences between Vienna congress and the Versailles peace process was that Vienna congress was successful in arriving a compromise formula acceptable to both the parties whereas Versailles peace process failed to achieve such a consensus. Germans left with no other option and they succumbed to the pressure exerted by the opposite party. On the other hand, France got a better deal through the Vienna congress and managed to escape with less punishment. The negotiators of Vienna Congress did everything to regain the peace in Europe without sacrificing much of the interests of the France whereas the negotiators of Versailles peace process have done everything to humiliate the Germans.
The Versailles peace process was completely a one sided affair. Germans forced to accept the conditions set by the negotiators because of the lack of other options available for them at that time. This treaty was successful in destroying German economy (This treaty has taken away Germanys foreign possessions, along with any private or government property in them), which finally led to the Second World War. Moreover, Germans forced to liquidate much capital immediately in order to pay the war reparations of 33 billion gold marks, an amount which the Allies could increase whenever they saw fit (Valarauko)
Vienna treaty has achieved its objectives. It helped Europe from further conflicts. On the other hand, Versailles peace process failed to achieve its objectives. In
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Diplomacy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1561061-diplomacy
(Diplomacy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Diplomacy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1561061-diplomacy.
Most countries that have been relying on public diplomacy in the past are to day turning back to cultural and citizen diplomacy as away of reaching out. This paper actually discusses the aspect of public and citizen diplomacy. Besides, aspects of cultural diplomacy have also been discussed.
The history of diplomacy dates back in the ancient times when king send messengers to deliver messages to other kings. Diplomacy has evolved through the ages, since the beginning of civilization, to the modern day diplomacy which involves representatives of states negotiating on behave of their governments.
In the very recent article in reputable Washington Post, former ambassador to NATO Kurt Volker suggests that “attending the 2014 Olympics under today’s circumstances” equals to “cementing in practice Russia’s changing European borders by force”. Contemporary athletes become ambassadors of political regimes and representatives of national culture.
Nowadays it has become obvious that there is some vacuum in existent international relations. Today we face some serious disagreements with respect to the question what kind of world order should be established in the twenty first century.
The arriving of new age has left us a handle to give thought to the future of international relations and the role of world diplomacy in their evolution.
By virtue of the aforementioned, most, if not all, Diplomatic Missions comprise within themselves commercial, political, legal and military state representations, among others. Focusing on military representation, this report will elucidate upon the functions and purposes of Defence Diplomacy Missions.
Also, diplomacy can be likened to foreign policy. Hans J. Morgenthau defined diplomacy as "the formation and execution of foreign policy"(De Magalhaes, 1988: p. 49) And, many political scientists identify the term diplomacy as synonymous with foreign policy.