Law - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Gambling or gaming is an agreement between two or more individuals to play collectively at a game of chance for a stake or wager,…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96% of users find it useful
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Law"

LAW QUESTION ANSWER Before embarking upon the reply to this question, it would be appropriate to define gambling, as well as the wagering contract. Gambling or gaming is an agreement between two or more individuals to play collectively at a game of chance for a stake or wager, which will become the property of the winner and to which all involved make a contribution. (Quoted in hence, an agreement is gambling provided it fulfils the following conditions:
An agreement between two or more individuals or parties
The agreement is made in order to play a game of chance collectively
The game is for stake or wager
The winner would be the sole beneficiary of the property contributed for the game
In the case under-study, Sam Wilson is approached by his coworkers to participate in a football pool, where there exists the probability of winning a new car by one of the players i.e. the winner. Since football pools are meant for betting in favor one specific team or player, it comes under the definition of gambling. Section 6 (1) and (2) of the Gambling Act 2005 defines gaming in these words:
(1) In this Act “gaming” means playing a game of chance for a prize.
(2) In this Act “game of chance”—
(a) includes—
(i) a game that involves both an element of chance and an element of skill,
(ii) a game that involves an element of chance that can be eliminated by superlative skill, and
(iii) a game that is presented as involving an element of chance, but
(b) does not include a sport.
Hence, the activity offered to Wilson is gambling, and does not come under the fold of sports at all. Consequently, the activity is illegal in the eyes of law and void agreement according to the statutes of Contract Act.
QUESTION 2: (ANSWER): In the case under analysis, the following facts appear:
Sam and his cousin are the parties to the contract, where the Sam is the borrower and his cousin is the lender
Sam has borrowed $ 1,000 from the cousin, and lent the same amount to Sam.
The agreement was completed with the free consent of both the parties to the contract without any signs of coercion, fraudulence, misrepresentation or undue influence
The parties to the contract did not decide the time period, mode and method of payment
The agreement was not in written form, nor there was any witness or proof of entering into the agreement
The cousin demanded his amount, and in response of his demand of repayment, only 19% of the total borrowed amount was paid to him by Sam through check
Since Sam had written on the check that it was the full amount paid by him to his cousin, the cousin got it cashed from the bank
The cousin could return the check to Sam, or could make him remove the words full payment from the check, but he did not bother it
Since check is an important negotiable instrument, which serves as an imperative document in the eyes of law, it proves the very fact that the borrower had paid the full amount to the lender.
There are two types of offer and acceptance to an agreements i.e. Express and Implied. Express offer or acceptance involves words, whether written or oral, and Implied form of agreement is considered on the basis of the performance of an act. Since, the cousin accepted the check from Sam, and did not protest against it, it means that he has accepted the terms and conditions of the offer made by Sam. Consequently, the cousin cannot claim any remedies against it, provided he accepted the terms and conditions of the agreement by receiving the check from the borrower i.e. Sam.
QUESTION 3: (ANSWER): The case above-mentioned carries the following facts:
The Cameo Industries clearly declared sexual harassment of workers as the direct violence of its rules and regulations, which could be led to penalties inflicted upon the violator
Maureen suffered the sexual harassment from her supervisor, which was an obvious violation of the rules and regulations determined by the Cameo Industries
Maureen lodged a complaint against the supervisor before the concerned official of the company
The supervisor was warned thrice against his professional misconduct, but no action could be taken against him.
Since Maureen could not seek any remedy against her supervisor, she had been under constant threat of sexual harassment, she could not get any solid or effective remedy against the harassment, she had to seek legal remedy from the court of law
Since the management of Cameo Industries has established some rules within its workplace, they must have implemented these rules for the security and welfare of the staff members on the one hand, and for the growth and discipline of the organization on the other. The employment law, Lester (2001) argues, can and should play an important role in providing feasible ways for families to balance the conflicting demands of work and care-giving obligations, particularly as women continue to seek full participation in the workforce. Though the company had no powers to announce legal penalty to the supervisor, it could seek the help of law enforcing agencies for the application of its rules. Since the management of the company failed to take any action against the supervisor, it is liable to be tried in the court of law on the basis of not providing a secure and pleasant atmosphere to its staff members.
QUESTION 4: (ANSWER): The case maintains the following facts:
The Jarvis family owned its land for more than 150 years, and cultivated it on the one hand, and bred and looked after the farm animals
With the passage of time, the area turned into a sub-urban zone, which forced the Jarvis sell their animals
Another family raised pigs in the same area seven years later to the issuance of an ordinance discouraging farming
Since the statutes of law are observed by all individuals and families equally, so if one family is banned to farm animals in a land, the other family or group of individuals also do not have any right to exercise the same activities. But with the passage of time, laws can be revised according to the changing scenario of a social set up. In addition, farming of dangerous animals in city area is strictly prohibited according to the criminal procedure code. In the same way, the neighbors of that family can also take the plea that it has no right to farm its pigs in the declared suburban zone.
Lester, Gillian. Unemployment Insurance and Wealth Redistribution (Quoted in 2001 2-3
The UK Gambling Act 2005 Section 6 (1) & (2) Office of Public Information Center 2009
Gaming (Retrieved from Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1”, n.d.)
Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1. Retrieved from
(Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 1)
Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 1.
“Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 1”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document



...? (a) Before the war, A had lent money to Cee Company. B now claims that it is en d to half of that money. B is en d to some amount of that money since at the time the contract was signed it was one country. However the amount of money it will receive is dependent on the location of Cee Company and whether its operations lie in country A, B or somewhere between the two. The motives behind the loan must also be assessed clearly in order to determine the objectives of the transaction. Just like the seceding state is obliged to pay its share of the national debt after the secession, it is also entitled to a fair share of the loan given to Cee Company. However the manner in which such transactions are to be handled often depends on the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay


...? Section 4 Introduction Legal matters in business situations are very common nowadays. They tend to create a formal and commercial dealings between one another of which law is a major part. No business dealing can be made outside the scope of the law and the terms implied by law. In various business situations, negligence can occur because of which the business can be held vicariously liable. There are some principles of liability that are separately applied for the business situations (Harpwood, 2008, 201). Applying negligence and its defenses in different business situations: The elements of negligence are existence of a duty of care, the breach of that duty and reasonable damage...
15 Pages(3750 words)Essay


...?Essay questions I believe that in this case, the Court should rule in favour of Elin and reject Grapes & Vines Winery’s action. The contract concluded between the parties specified a deadline for performing the contractual obligations. It stated that the wine was to be delivered on or before May 1. Therefore, Grapes & Vines Winery could have delivered the wine anytime before May 1, as the contract did not limit their duty to perform only on May 1. However, they chose to do it in the last possible day – May 1. The fact that the delivery van was involved in an accident does not constitute an objective impediment to performing the contract (destruction of the subject matter of the contract cannot be used as an excuse in this case... questions I ...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay


...., is primarily liable because under the agency law, the principal is liable for all the acts of the agent which are within the authority usually confided to an agent of that character, notwithstanding limitations, as between the principal and the agent, put upon that authority. The driver was acting within the authority confided to him by the principal when the accident happened. 6. Answer: As an independent contractor, the driver of the truck is primarily liable because the employer has no control how the work is done provided the result was delivered to him. 7. Answer. a. the plaintiffs can collect the entire judgment from either defendant 8. Answer: Punitive damages are in order in this case for this is a tort case of...
7 Pages(1750 words)Assignment


...Messrs Soil can prevent the Tom brothers and Salisbury’s from marketing their bags in by using the common law. They have been using the markfor a year and in fact have been successful in marketing the same in their trade. Being the first to manufacture and put into commercial circulation the tompot bag, they a have acquired trademark rights on it. Trademarks and service marks are words, names, symbols, or devices used by manufacturers of goods and providers of services to identify their goods and services, and to distinguish their goods and services from goods manufactured and sold by others (Radcliffe and Brinson, n.d.). Trademarks could be any combination of words, names or symbols that are used in commerce as brand...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay


...committed in a gravious manner if an individual or group cause severe injury to the others or the individual or group causes severe injury using a fatal weapon or deadly weapon (Chambliss 2011). Throughout, the law treated the threat of physical injury as assault while battery was considered the complete contact to cause harm. This version of the distinction is no longer valid as compared to the physical contact hence null and void. For Hilder to be taken to the hospital after being hit by the husband with a chair leg by the husband Billy is a clear example of Assault or battery to mention. The act is worsened when Billy further exposes their violent acts to the public through putting a slap on the face of the nurse,...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Company Law - English law

...(a) It was established in Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897 that 'The company is at law a different person altogether from the subscribers. Nor aresubscribers as members liable, in any shape or form, except to the extent and in the manner provided by the [Companies] Act.'2 It is a general principle of English law that it is not possible in the absence of agency, a trust relationship or wrongful trading to hold one person liable for the debts of another.3 However, like most common law principles and judicial interpretations it is a rebuttable presumption which must give way to a statement to the contrary 'in clear and unequivocal language'4 by Parliament. Under its equitable discretion the...
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study


...Question In our problem Idyllic Hotels agreed to pay, Budget Builders an additional amount £125,000 for completion of the work in time since the latter was beset with financial difficulties. According, to the doctrine of promissory estoppel, Idyllic Hotels cannot deny the extra payment. The following case law discusses the doctrine of promissory estoppel. In Williams v Roffey it was held that if a party to a contract, subsequently, agreed to pay an extra amount to the other party, so that the other party performs his contractual obligations, then that agreement is binding if the party offering the extra amount obtains some new practical advantage or if he has avoided a disadvantage.1 Similarly, in CTN Cash and Carry...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay


...TABLE OF CONTENTS SL. NO. Page No Introduction 2-3 1 International Petroleum Agreements 3-4 2 IPAs and Environmental Pollution 4-5 2 ExxonMobil Corp. Violates The Clean Air Act 5-6 2.1 Shell Group to Install Anti – Pollution Equipment 6-7 3 Observations 7-8 3.1 Oil Sector of Libya and Environmental Laws 9 3.2 BP Deploys Oil Spill Minimization System 10 4 Oil Spill is a Worldwide Issue 11-12 5 Conclusion 12-13 Sources 14 INTERNATIONAL PETROLEUM AGREEMENTS and the Environmental Clause 1. Introduction Since times immemorial human beings have been relentlessly finding ways of obtaining various resources from nature that not just address their vital needs, but also promise financial prosperity. These activities of mankind...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper

SCOTS LAW - commercial law

...Scots Law - Commercial Law al Affiliation) Scots Law - Commercial Law: Might the regime governing a buyer’s remedies for defective goods be improved? Scots law is the jurisprudence of the inhabitant of Scotland. Scotland though is part of the United Kingdom; its legal system is autonomous. It has its own laws with courts. The law of Scotland originates from a large number of sources; laws in Scotland are totally different from those of other parts of the United Kingdom. The varied sources from which this law originates include; Legal principles and the Roman law Scots...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic Law for FREE!

Contact Us