Nobody downloaded yet

Parliamentary Vs. Presidential - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
There are two key branches of government dependent upon each other that form the parliament: the legislative branch and the executive branch. In…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.5% of users find it useful
Parliamentary Vs. Presidential
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Parliamentary Vs. Presidential"

Download file to see previous pages The government can be dissolved at will by the parliament by means of a no confidence vote or the leader of the cabinet may dissolve the parliament if it is not able to function anymore.
On the contrary, a presidential government is one in which the executive branch is not accountable to the legislative branch. Both branches can check the actions of the other branch. The President and the members of Congress are elected in separate elections. The President holds office for a fixed term and his authority is not subject to direct control of the legislature. However, the President cannot dissolve government and order a new election. Clearly, there is a difference in the voting system between a parliamentary government and a presidential government.
The indefinite terms of office in a parliamentary system allows a party to hold office and thus are permanent in order to provide some stability to the system. However, it may be argued that this may lead to unfavorable type of ruling for a country. This is because the possibility of the head of government holding office for life contributes towards the making of an autocrat. Especially in nations with weak democratic traditions and with executive powers concentrated in the hands of the party in power, this type of system signals dictatorship. It also does not welcome new ideas or changes that could benefit the economy of a country in the long term.
For instance, the former Prime Minister of Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew, from 1959 to 1990 recently commented the decision by the current Prime Minister to open a casino in Singapore would never happen under his control. However, he welcomed the changes as fresh and different.
A divided executive is one in which the relative powers vary between a Prime Minister and a President, representing two different parties and ideologies. This is important in a system where there are no dual lines of authority. A divided executive results in varied institutional forms to allow ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Parliamentary Vs. Presidential Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Parliamentary Vs. Presidential Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from
(Parliamentary Vs. Presidential Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Parliamentary Vs. Presidential Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words.
“Parliamentary Vs. Presidential Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Parliamentary Vs. Presidential

Parliamentary System VS Presidential System

...? Parliamentary System VS Presidential System Parliamentary System VS Presidential System Democratic governments are those that permit the nation's citizens to manage their government either directly or through elected representatives. This is opposed to authoritarian governments that limit or prohibit the direct participation of its citizens. Two of the most popular types of democratic governments are the presidential and parliamentary systems (Parliamentary Versus Presidential Governments, 2011) Different types of political systems prevailing in the current world. Broadly speaking, based on the nature of functioning the entire political systems in the world can be classified into tow; democratic systems and totalitarian systems... ....
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Which is a better system of government: parliamentary or presidential

...of a viable democratic political system and sustainable economic development of any country regardless of what system of government is being implemented. References American Chronicle. (2009). Parliamentary Vs. Presidential Government. Retrieved on March 23, 2011, from Lijphart, Arend.(1992). Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government. New York: Oxford University. Mishra, Sachidanano, Malik, D N., and Singh, Raghuveer. (1986). Indian Democracy at the Crossroads. New Delhi, India: K.M. Mittal Publications Philippine Institute of Democratic Studies. (2006). Forming a Government:...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Parliamentary sovereignty

...?Parliamentary Sovereignty By Introduction In the prehistoric era man was slave to man. Traditionally, man was treated as an entity, astonishingly, by creatures belonging to his very own race, humans. Man was bought and sold in open markets. But with the passage of time things changed as we witnessed the era of renaissance, marked by the progress and development of man from an animal to a social animal. Though the times have changed but still, the struggle continued. Indeed the subjects changed, the barriers transformed and the roles in the society revolutionized but still man kept on striving for freedom and independence. The term freedom or independence here must not be associated to escaping from human slavery in fact over time... ...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Parliamentary sovereignty

...?Parliamentary Sovereignty The notion of Parliamentary Sovereignty has been central to democratic practice for a considerable period of time. In a democracy, the legislature is elected by popular vote and this has been a major feature of the English Constitution. In the initial stages of democracy in Britain, liberty was at grave risk due to monarchical power.1 As a consequence of the doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty, the Parliament was empowered to enact or rescind any law whatsoever. In addition, no individual or organisation was permitted by English Law to set aside or overrule legislation enacted by Parliament. In R (Jackson) v Attorney General,2 Lord Hope stated that...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Parliamentary Sovereignty

...?Parliamentary Sovereignty By Word Count (Excluding foot s and bibliography 308 Words. Parliamentary Sovereignty During the 1880s, Oxford Professor A.V. Dicey proposed a theory of Parliamentary sovereignty that encompassed a hierarchal constitutional structure with Parliament reigning supreme. Dicey’s theory of Parliamentary sovereignty has wielded significant influence over definitions and concepts of Parliamentary sovereignty until recently.1 Specifically, Dicey argued that Parliament, elected by and representing the public, had the authority to make and unmake any law.2 Moreover, according to Dicey, the power of Parliament is so absolute that no other...
5 Pages(1250 words)Coursework

Parliamentary Sovereignty

...Topic: Parliamentary Sovereignty Language Style: English UK Grade: 2 Answer: To understand and assess the question, it is necessary to look back to 1945 and a Europe that had been devastated by war: politically, economically, and socially. In the desire to attain some form of harmony in order to guarantee peace and to rebuild Europe. The Treaty on European Union (Maastricht) 1992 involved the creation of the European Union. UK incorporated of the EC law into domestic law by European Communities Act 1972. By virtue of ss .2 (1), 2(2), and 2(4) EC law was directly incorporated.1 Art. 221 provide that the Court of Justice will consist of fifteen judges. They are appointed is for six term of office of six years through the term... of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Parliamentary and Presidential System

...Parliamentary and Presidential System The Parliamentary system or Presidential System are two most important governance systems in the world which are effectively in place in most of the countries. In Parliamentary system, executive is directly or indirectly dependent on the legislature whereas in Presidential System of governance, the executive branch exists and presides separately from the legislature. The main difference between both the systems of governance is the fact that under Parliamentary System, the Chief Executive of the country is accountable and responsible to the legislature and has the power to dismiss him whereas in case of Presidential System, the Chief Executive of the State is not accountable to legislature... and in...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Parliamentary Supremacy

...The doctrine of Parliamentary Supremacy ‘has been the very foundation of the British constitution since at least the latter days of the nineteenth century.’(Carroll, Constitutional & Administrative law, 5th ed) 2009. Parliamentary supremacy is an expression that explains that the Westminster parliament is legally entitled to pass, amend, or repeal any law it wishes to pass. Carroll states:” The theory of ‘continuing’ sovereignty, as explained by professor Dicey, is that there are no limits to the legislative competence of parliament is absolutely sovereign in its own time and may legislate as it wishes on any topic and for any place.”1 It is important to mention that parliament will consist of the commons, Lords, and the Monarch... . If the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Parliamentary Sovereignty

...Parliamentary Sovereignty Thesis ment The European Communities Act compromises Parliamentary Supremacy in the UK. This has been established by the following discussion. Introduction Parliamentary Sovereignty is a basic tenet, which dictates as follows. Parliament is the supreme legislative body that can enact, annul, or modify any law. It can, in its discretion alter the laws enacted by its predecessors, if it deems fit to do so. As per the words of an eminent scholar, the soul of Parliamentary Sovereignty can be embodied in the statement, “What the Queen in Parliament enacts is law”.1 In a tacit manner, it can now be well understood that the legislative branch of...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Parliamentary sovereignty

...The Principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty and Judicial Supremacy in UK Essay Number of Words The Principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty and Judicial Supremacy in UK With the institutionalization of the constitution in the United Kingdom, Legislative supremacy is adept by firmly following the notion that Parliament does not apply its independence. Set up by the legislative arm of government in a domineering and totalitarian way. Judiciary independence depends on how the other arms of government maintain a dependent working atmosphere that allows them to work separately without any influence from other sources. It ensures that the rule of law is fully enforced and consistently. These separations allow for...
7 Pages(1750 words)Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Parliamentary Vs. Presidential for FREE!

Contact Us