Mini-Project (fourth) - Essay Example

A focus is given to scheduling. This is illustrated with a sample precedence diagram. Design related changes that led to delays and extra costs could easily have been avoided through careful planning and allowing for some changes before implementing the physical carrying out of the project. The major changes that caused setbacks were as follows: The production line control software had to be mostly rewritten after “Miles Faster jumped at the opportunity to get involved and decided to change the production train specification to increase capacity.

” Dispute resolution – Leadbetter was loathe to discuss the documents on the specifications of the mechanical equipment with Ivar Kontrak and instead dealt directly with Amos Dent of Tinknockers Associates. Regulations – “Neither Moneysworth nor Leadbetter was conscious of the need for any review and approval procedures for specifications and shop drawings submitted directly by either S&P or by Eddie Forgot of Piecemeal Corporation, the suppliers of the production train.” (case study) Lack of coordination – Spencer Moneysworth was responsible for the project but many of the efforts of others were uncoordinated.

For example, between the foundation layers of the building and the catalogue describers and specifiers. Quality became an issue for example when Leadbetter knew that the specifications for the mechanical equipment for the dust-free paint shop governed the quality of equipment, workmanship and performance. Similarly is the case with meeting the environmental safety standards. The delivery schedule slipped two weeks due to the manufacturing drawings for the critical long-lead equipment sitting in a junior clerk’s in-tray awaiting approval.

This also contributed “to a later construction schedule conflict in tying-in the new services.” Objectives should be clearly defined so that it is also clear how well the project is progressing. Additionally, requirements should be