Stakeholder Law Issues - Essay Example

1. Basically, a stakeholder can be loosely defined as any person who may be involved in a particular case or who may be affected by that same case inanother way. In my own opinion, I think there are mainly three stakeholders who are directly involved in the given cases outlined in the stories of the Lady and the Tiger. The King’s daughter, the Royal Princess and the gardener’s son are directly involved in this case. By virtue of being the father of the adored Princess as well as the ultimate authority, the King is also part of the case hence he is also a stakeholder. So, basically these are the major stakeholders directly involved in the case. In the event that the prisoner opens a door with a lady behind, then she automatically becomes part of the ongoing case therefore she would also be a stakeholder in the case outlined above. The gardener and his family are likely to be affected as well as they would be strongly attached to the accused who is son and brother to them. The ordinary people who live in the kingdom are also stakeholders as they would also likely to be affected by the same laws that would have been applied on the gardener’s son. These are members of the same community hence they are part and parcel of the kingdom. 2. The pillars of caring and fairness would best support the Princess Royal’s decision to have the gardener’s son select the door that holds the lady. Caring is basically the heart of ethics and it is concerned with the welfare of others. Therefore, a person who really cares feels the emotional response to both the pain and pleasure of others. In this particular case, the gardener’s son and the Royal Princess were in love which entails deep affection of each other from deep down their hearts. However, the judgement that would be passed on the gardener’s son would cut the relationship between the two in either way. In any case, whether he selects the door that holds a tiger or the lady, that would be the end of their affair. The other door would lead to death and the other would lead to a happy marriage with an equally very beautiful lady. If the Royal Princess’s selection would lead to the lady, then it would show that she greatly cares about his welfare though the gardener’s son would be marrying another different person. It would show that she is concerned about his welfare. On the other hand the pillar of fairness entails the issues of impartiality, equality as well as openness. Whilst it was not appropriate for the gardener’s son to fall in love with the King’s daughter by virtue of the law, naturally the two were inclined to each other hence there would be every reason to be compassionate to each other be it in sorrow or happiness. By showing the boy the door with the lady, she would just have exercised fairness of sparing his life though he would be marrying another lady. 3. Assuming that there are likely chances of 70 % that she will send him to his death, the pillar of responsibility would best support his decision to choose the opposite door from the one she directs him. The pillar of responsibility posits, that being responsible means being accountable for what we do. It also means that we would be able to identify who we are. Responsibility means recognising what we do by virtue of being obliged to do it. In short accountability sums up the qualities of responsibility. An accountable person is not always a victim and does not shift blame on others. In fact, he is able to recognize the likely chances of triumph of evil if nothing is done therefore, would take precautionary measures. In this case, the gardener’s son having realised that the Royal Princess would lead him to his death, the noble thing to do would be to choose the opposite door since it would be his responsibility to take care of his life. Under normal circumstances, no sane person would knowingly opt for his death no matter what. Indeed it can be a crime to be in love with the King’s daughter which is prohibited by the law, but it would not be appropriate to go for your death knowingly when there is another better option that would lead to a happy marriage with a beautiful lady. 4. I personally think that the King’s daughter would show the gardener’s soon the door with the lady. Indeed, these people have been in love and they were neither forced nor coerced by anyone into doing it. They also knew the repercussions of their affair given that it was prohibited by the law for anyone to fall in love with the king’s daughter the reason why they always attempted to keep their affair as a secret. I personally think that she will show him the door with the lady to spare his life by virtue of showing respect since these two were in love by choice. By taking this stance she, believes in the pillar of respect. The pillar of respect is concerned with regarding the worth of every human being. As human beings, in most cases we are obliged to honour the essential worth and dignity of every individual even the heinous. Respect prohibits violence, humiliation and exploitation. It reflects such notions as civility, courtesy, decency and tolerance. In this particular case, tolerance would amply describe the stance she will take in sparing his life. In most cases an ethical person accepts individual differences and beliefs without prejudice. I think she will be guided by this ethical pillar which posits that respect fo life is more important than anything else. 5. In the event that the gardener’s son is killed, and his family decide to contest the King’s justice system which they believe to be flawed, I would choose the pillar of fairness upon which to build a rationale around to challenge this flawed system. I think this pillar would create a system of justice that would better serve the people of this kingdom in that it would strive to address issues pertinent to the justice system. Fairness involves issues of impartiality, proportionality and openness when dealing with justice issues that affect the citizens. The king’s justice system is to a certain extent flawed in that his decision is final and he does not consider any viable options in passing a decision. Selective judgement upon which the accused would either open a door that would lead his death or get a reward is not a fair judgement by any standard. One person may be just unfortunate but in reality he would be innocent and just a victim of unfounded allegations. The king’s justice system is restrictive in that it does not have an option of weighing the facts obtaining on the ground. The justice system should be impartial meaning that the decisions should be made without favouritism or prejudice. The current system is narrow-minded in that the same judgement of punishment and reward is applied to every case. This system is preoccupied with barbarism than the delivery of justice. Fairness should involve gathering information and evaluating it in a necessary manner to make appropriate decisions. This pillar would be more appropriate in creating the justice system that would better serve the people of this kingdom in that it requires either an individual or society correct mistakes promptly. It would be improper to take advantage of the weakness of others by virtue of being in control of authority and power. Read More