Response to Two Models of Management - Essay Example

The paper concludes that there is no need to follow it. The paper fails to provide more reasons or more arguments that can support this conclusion. Meanwhile, it says that PMMM cannot be considered an agile model since it is not adaptable to changes quickly in the model structure when new project management processes take place.

In a conclusion, the paper gives a detailed discussion on whether both models can be used simultaneously. It is a rather better conclusion as it provides reasons such as the PMMM model will work well in requiring some level of project management for the software development teams using the RAD model to create new programs. The paper offers an analytical outline of RAD and PMMM models with comparisons, scopes, and application levels.

The L O paper is an attempt to outline the differences between two project management methodologies; Project Management Institute’s (PMI) study plan and Rapid Application Development (RAD). Though it is not a detailed discussion of comparison between these two methodologies, it provides the features of each method and outlines the areas that are adaptable to each one. The paper would be exceptionally good and extremely easy for the readers to grasp the features if the paper includes the differences between these methods along with the advantages and disadvantages of each method regarding particular application levels.

The paper explores some features of RAD development. RAD is represented as an agile methodology that works well associated with software and industrial products. This paper gives efficiency as compared to the outcome, or from the viewpoint of the customer. The term ‘until the customer is happy’ basically represents its efficiency from the viewpoint of its results.

The best feature of this report is that it is quite application-level, more specifically; it attempts to give the features of methods through examples and applications. Applying the PMI method in constructing a house is preferred to other methods in this report because it is more appropriate to this as compared to the RAD method. But still, the reasons why RAD methodology is not appropriate for a particular project are not given.

The paper gives neither advantages nor disadvantages of any method. “As its name indicates, Rapid Application Development’s primary advantage lies in an application’s increased development speed and decreased time to delivery” (Rapid Application Development, 2005). There are no mentions of other advantages as well like increased quality, reduced scalability, etc in this paper, but these are very important to give an exact overview of RAD.