StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Howard Becker and the Labelling Theory on Crime and Deviance - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The author of the paper under the title "Howard Becker and the Labelling Theory on Crime and Deviance" will begin with the statement that in 1963, Howard Saul Becker developed the labeling theory in response to the problem of crime and deviance…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.7% of users find it useful
Howard Becker and the Labelling Theory on Crime and Deviance
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Howard Becker and the Labelling Theory on Crime and Deviance"

Howard S. Becker and the Labelling Theory on Crime and Deviance In 1963, Howard S. Becker developed the labeling theory in a response towards the problem of crime and deviance. Although the early sixties was also an evolution towards the independent human spirit which later on would evolve in to the hippie era as we know it and from this scene we can understand how it was that Becker created a theory in which the labeling of a person who has committed deviant acts as being detrimental to the future of the person as well as the society in which the person is in as they will be morally judged and thus pushing them further back towards their deviance. A person who has been labeled deviant will assume that they are deviant and will be treated as a deviant person and therefore self-fulfills their own prophecy as to the role and the status that they fill within society. A similar theory was proposed by a study conducted by Edwin Lemert (Haralombos & Holborn 2004: 348). Lemert studied North Pacific Coastal Indians and examined social reactions and deviance. Lemert argued in correlation to his study was that deviance was caused by social reactions, his study found out that stuttering did not exist among American Indians and that they did not even have a word to describe speech irregularity. However the North Pacific Coastal Indians whom had a rich history involving speech as traditional ceremonies dictated and praised those who had oral abilities such as singing and speech-making. Because of this parents who usually initiate small children into the society by ceremonies such as this are very cautious and fearful of any speech impediment that their children might have. Those who failed or did not have the ability to become highly articulate were scorned and was vulnerable to peer pressure, this in return resulted a higher rate of speech defects due to cautionary fear. This was in comparison to the other American Indian societies that did not appear to label that such defects exist. Basing on the study Lemert concludes that by labeling and social awareness of such defects actually helps create them by putting anxiety and fear thus the children’s inability for articulate speech. Becker’s labeling theory was used by many sociologists as to how and why deviance was created but it did not address specifically as to how the labeling theory could be applied within society, what was missing from Becker’s labeling theory was that although to some extent it is necessarily true that his argument of deviance and crime was somewhat similar in essence and correlated its functions with one another but deviance is by all means an act that was different from the social norm. In some cases such deviant acts are labeled as criminal and in other societies as being normal but it does not border to the question of criminality, while it is true that some acts of crime such as paedophilia warrant a psychological and even in some instances a biological defect, it is not known as to what extent the question of nature versus nurture play in creating excessively deviant characteristics (Giddens 1997:175). Becker then fails to exemplify the factor of criminality and criminals and to what extent that it becomes necessary to control criminals by labeling them as criminals. However, in some instances Becker’s arguments concerning as to what may seem deviant in one society may seem very normal in another is essential to view some aspects of deviation, when Becker argued that “deviance is not a quality of the act the person commits, but rather a consequence of the application by others,” he forgets that there are certain aspects and criterion that needed to be addressed as to the phenomenon he was trying to express. It may be true that nudity in the West is frowned upon and women’s breasts are taboo but in other cultures the exposure of breasts are seen as being part and parcel of everyday life and are considered asexual. Labeling in the media and society pushes people to consider that nudity is deviant, what Becker actually misses is that in the world of the mass media today when although nudity is still considered deviant behaviour semi-nude women grace media covers and are considered sexual sirens of the day. When labeling occurs it does not necessarily mean that the labeled is undesirable within a society, it could actually be secretly or openly desired by a large majority even if social norms dictate it as being deviant. There have also been many instances of current sociologists who believe otherwise from Becker’s labeling theory. It could be possible that some aspects of the labeling theory cannot accommodate the fast changing globalized world today and that perspectives have become multi-faceted and coming from different parts of the world and different cultures that labeling has become incessant, even downright old-fashioned. For example, Stephen Jones (2001) (Haralombos & Holborn 2004:349) argued that there were several implications when the labeling theory is applied within the institutionalized society. Labeling theories, he argues, have a way when actually many criminal and violent acts are de-labeled and the criminal act itself, decriminalized and thus actually enforcing the belief and justification that such deviant acts are the norm. The de-labeling process restricts peers from making moral judgements towards deviant behaviour of the person in question and by leaving the deviant act free and not ‘wrong’ a person may commit the same acts repeatedly believing that he or she is acting within the limits of society. Secondly, Jones argues that the use of the labeling theory in practice within institutionalized societies actually create even more problems. De-labeling allows criminals from ever giving information of their past deviant and criminal acts towards their employers to allow better assimilation into the workforce. The problem is that certain crimes such as paedophilia and excessive violence if withheld will create problems if the person in question should apply for a job at a children’s daycare center or in a school. Another criticism as to the interactionist perspective comes from Gouldner (1975) (Haralombos & Holborn 2004:350). Gouldner argues that the interactionist perspective is excessive in placing their confidence on the nurture aspect of the development of a human being. The labeling theory also does not recognize other aspects that could counteract when being labeled as deviant, it assumes fully that when a person who has committed a deviant act whether truthfully or wrongfully would never be able to achieve a better status or role within their lives and would continually remain deviant because they are already labeled. The human being is not a passive creature that explicitly accepts everything within their lives, they have the ability or choice to change their situation even if the situation seems constraining (Bauman 1997:107-124). Another aspect is that Becker also fails to notice the pros and cons that come with labeling, peer pressure and moral judgement. Labeling and moral judgement does not necessarily act as a manner in which to place a person within a society as deviant and continually throughout to be deviant it also serves as a failsafe and is employed to protect others within the society from committing acts of deviance. Labeling need not necessarily be construed as being negatively crushing but it could also act as a catalyst that could drive a person to social and self betterment. In another aspect of the weakness of the labeling theory is that it only makes an example of those who are poor and do not have the means for upward social mobility that they are turning into a life of crime and deviance to make a living, it does not magnify other acts of deviance that are conducted by those who are not being labeled by society. For example, white collar crime causes even more liabilities than petty crimes of those who are being labeled, what is the catalyst that pushes such people who are usually of a better background in life to commit acts of deviance and crime? (Germov & Poole 2006:301-315) Because of such arguments the labeling theory although is somewhat necessary and beneficial for the assimilation of those who have been labeled as criminals to continue their lives it also acts negatively towards the other aspects that needs to be addressed. In conclusion, Becker’s argument of the individual who have committed an act of deviance as nothing but the tool of his or her society that has propelled them to actually continuously commit actions of deviance is not fully valid but serves as a reminder that in certain aspects of our lives, labeling an individual excessively could lead to moral deterioration but to protect a person from being labeled and morally judged will do nothing but provide them a justification towards their actions. Reference: Bauman, Z. (1997), Thinking Sociologically, Ch.6, pp.107-124, Oxford, Blackwell Publishers Germov, J. & Poole, M., (2006) Public Sociology : An Introduction to Australian Society., Ch.15, pp 310-315, Sydney, Allen & Unwin Giddens, A. (1997), Sociology (3rd ed.), Ch. 8, pp.171-175, Cornwall, Polity Press Haralombos, M. & Holborn, M. (2004) Sociology Themes and Perspectives (6th ed.) , Ch. 6, pp.346-350 London, HarperCollins Publishers Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Sociology: According to Becker, deviance is not a quality of the act Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1541606-sociology-according-to-becker-deviance-is-not-a-quality-of-the-act-the-person-commits-but-rather-a-consequence-of-the-application-by-others-of-rules-and-san
(Sociology: According to Becker, Deviance Is Not a Quality of the Act Essay)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1541606-sociology-according-to-becker-deviance-is-not-a-quality-of-the-act-the-person-commits-but-rather-a-consequence-of-the-application-by-others-of-rules-and-san.
“Sociology: According to Becker, Deviance Is Not a Quality of the Act Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1541606-sociology-according-to-becker-deviance-is-not-a-quality-of-the-act-the-person-commits-but-rather-a-consequence-of-the-application-by-others-of-rules-and-san.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Howard Becker and the Labelling Theory on Crime and Deviance

Reexamining illegal Immigration under the labelling theory

This paper discusses illegal immigration and the notion of the illegal immigrant as a “deviant” through the lens of the labelling theory.... The center of discussion in this paper is that the stigma attached to illegal immigration and the identification of illegal immigrants as deviants is as much reflective of the society that designates illegal immigration as a form of deviance as it is of the behavior of the deviant himself or herself.... l's Readings in Deviant Behaviour, which states that “deviance is not a quality that lies in behavior itself, but in the interaction between the person who commits an act and those who respond to it....
11 Pages (2750 words) Research Paper

LABELLING THEORY HAS NO IMPACT ON REAL WORLD DECISION MAKING PRACTISES

Walker, M K0136881 Psy1001N Introduction to core areas Labelling theory has no impact on real world decision making practices Labelling Theory in the Real World Sociology, psychology, criminology, health care, and several other fields have undeniably been affected by the ideas of the labelling theory, in one way or another.... Consequences of labelling the labelling theory hypothesizes that deviance is not inherent, but rather a product of reaction to established societal norms, or results of societal perceptions....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Labelling Theory Explanation

the labelling theory took a lesson from Kai Erikson (p.... The paper "labelling theory Explanation" states that labelling theory argues that just observing the delinquent, or its characteristics, will not construct a whole image of deviance or crime.... labelling theory argues that just observing the delinquent, or its characteristics, will not provide a whole image of deviance or crime.... labelling theory is used as a way to understand deviant behaviour, including crime, as a consequence of social differentiation processes in which some of society's members are singled out, identified, and defined as deviant, while others are not (Traub and Little 289-295)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Criminal Profiling

Despite the United States being known as a country where racial discrimination is abhorred and any form of hate crime is penalized, racial profiling remains to be a prevalent practice by agents of the state.... The argument is that because it is true that there are crimes that certain racial groups are more predisposed to committing than other racial groups, 'special efforts at crime reduction directed at members of such groups are justified, if not required....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Social Approaches to Crime

Therefore, equal distribution of power and wealth can curb crime and deviance.... Durkheim believed that every society needed deviance to remain healthy and was therefore inevitable in every society (Haralambos & Holborn, 1995).... He thought that deviance is a result of the structure of society.... Innovation is where the person even resorts to deviance to achieve the goals.... The paper "Social Approaches to crime" highlights that we cannot under-estimate levels of working-class crime simply because police practices, the collection of Official statistics and so forth under-estimate the extent of middle and upper-class crime....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Prison Gangs and Security Threat Groups

This research paper establishes the connection between gangs and immigration pointing out how many gangs are non-American in origin and argues that the policy of keeping illegal immigrants in jail has had tremendous social ramifications, one of which is the creation and flourishing of prison gangs....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper

Introduction to Criminological Theory: Labelling Theory

"Introduction to Criminological Theory: labelling theory" paper highlights labeling theory and its contribution to understanding crime.... Key labeling theorists such as howard becker, Edwin Lemert, Herbert Mead, and Stanley Cohen have attributed deviance and a criminal way of life to labeling [Carrabine et al, 2004]1.... howard becker was a leading figure in the labeling theory movement.... The development of secondary deviance is an application of the Thomas theorem which states that situations defined as a real result in similar consequences....
5 Pages (1250 words) Coursework

Amplifying Criminality Through Labelling

abeling theory was first postulated by an American Sociologist howard becker and it explains the causes of deviance and criminality in the society.... In other words, the theory claims that conformity and deviance is not usually constructed from what people do but from societal response to those actions.... ne classic example of how social labelling of criminal behavior can have a negative impact is the labelling of East Coast and West Coast gangs....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us