Moral luck involves the question of responsibility for that which one cannot control. Is it just to hold a person morally responsible for actions taken in response to a situation he/she did not bring about According to Thomas Nagel (1993), "where a significant aspect of what someone does depends on factors beyond his control, yet we continue to treat him in that respect as an object of moral judgment, it can be called moral luck" (59)…
Download file "Moral luck" to see previous pages...
Concepcion (2002) describes the "standard view of responsibility" whereby "it is unjust to hold a person morally responsible for that which she did not control. Agents deserve to be morally appraised or held liable only for that which they controlled" (455). The problem this poses is that at some level it can always be argued that a situation was outside of a person's control. Let us write or edit the essay on your topic "Moral luck" with a personal 20% discount.. Try it now There will invariably be some uncontrollable factor that, when joining the confluence of other factors over which a person did have control, it can be argued was the cause of any given scenario.
For example, if a person driving a vehicle strikes a child who suddenly runs into the road, it might be argued that the person could have been paying closer attention and thereby braked sooner, or should have been driving more slowly. On the other hand it could be argued that a reasonable person under the circumstances could not have predicted the child running into the road, and therefore this was just bad luck and the driver should not be held responsible. This epitomizes the concept of moral luck. To what extend does a random, uncontrollable occurrence relieve a person of moral responsibility for a harm done
Concepcion goes on to argue that accepting the standard view of responsibility "is tantamount t...
never morally responsible, show that luck is not ubiquitous or at least that ubiquitous luck is not moral, or show that ascriptions of responsibility can retain justice despite the omnipresence of luck" (455). The implication is that it does not make sense to avoid assigning responsibility simply because luck played a role in the moral dilemma, since luck will virtually always be a factor to some degree. This would logically mean that nobody is ever morally responsible for anything.
Paradox of Moral Luck and Moral Responsibility
The paradox, as Thomas Nagel (1979) describes it, is that individual moral responsibility is possible even though luck is ubiquitous. We hold a person responsible for actions taken within a scenario he/she did not bring about. It is possible for a person to be morally blameworthy even though the bulk of the circumstances bringing about a scenario were entirely outside of that person's control. Degrees of control are virtually irrelevant, as proximate causation of uncontrollable variables fails to offer any relief from a person's moral responsibility for actions taken within any given situation.
Consider the case of a soldier who voluntarily enlists in the U.S. Marine Corps in the hopes of being deployed in Iraq to fight in the war on terror. This person, after months of grueling patrols in Baghdad watching his fellow marines get killed by improvised explosive devices, decides to take revenge by entering the nearest civilian residence and shooting up the women and children inside. Then consider the kid who had his sights set on college but was instead drafted into the U.S. Army during the Vietnam War and becomes so worn down by the war and numbed to killing that he partakes in a massacre of civilians at Mai Lai. The former soldier chose to
...Download file "Moral luck" to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document "Moral luck"
(“Moral luck Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1534913-moral-luck
(Moral Luck Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
“Moral Luck Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1534913-moral-luck.
Cited: 0 times
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC "Moral luck"
The weakest account of evil cynicism is of the opinion that, factually, evil people are not in existence while versions, which are very strong, are of the opinion that there cannot be evil people. On the contrary, evil revivalists are of the opinion that evil individuals are in existence.
For Aristotle’s standard, this is the ultimate virtue for this compels an individual to act with utmost temperance by acting at the right extent at the right time for the right reason in the right way. Aristotle realizes that hitting this mean is extremely difficult for this is the ideal.
Since all mind-level arguments have mind level counter arguments, to arrive at the final solution is impossibility. In “Myth of Sisyphus,” Albert Camus argues, “Happiness and absurd are two sons of the same earth. They are inseparable. It would be a mistake to say that happiness necessarily springs from the absurd discovery.”(439-440 n.p.) Analogy like pushing a boulder up a hill will not help to reveal the truth relating to human existence in this world, seemingly full of contradictions.
Among the most competent texts available for the benefit of Purdue students the medium of movie has a significant place in the communication of valuable messages. Analyzed from this point of view, the movies of the modern day place before us examples of powerful communication through their texts.
People should know what they actually want and believe and this will help them a lot in choosing between right and wrong or good and bad.
Ethics is a branch of philosophy and it includes the good demeanor, behavior and life. It not only comprises of the common conception of analyzing right and wrong, but also it gives the concept of "the good life", a life which is worth living and pleasing.
Ethical egoism is further subdivided into three categories: Personal Ethical Egoism, Individual ethical egoism and Universal ethical egoism (Pojman & Fieser, 2011).
1) Personal Ethical Egoism: This is the belief that only I, the individual, should act
oned delinquents to mature and see the light, which forms one of the primary themes of the short story “The Luck of Roaring camp” written by Bret Harte. The story revolves around a gold mining camp that consisted primarily of criminals and outlaws, who had been rightfully
ver, what has to be decided is not if the occasion warrants torture but rather whether the precepts and tenets of a free, liberal, and democratic society are with the possible sacrifice in lives that such a situation might inflict. Ultimately, almost all of those individuals
The author bases his arguments on the pragmatist theory about the truth. Pragmatists posit that certain acts are good to perform but nothing makes them so. Pragmatists believe that we should not ask questions about truth because there is no such thing as truth. They believe that circumstances that determine the goodness or truth in something.