Nobody downloaded yet

Company Law and director incapacity - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
A company upon incorporation becomes a separate legal entity, which is distinct from its shareholders and directors. Its property and liabilities do not belong to its members. In other words, the acts of the company are not the acts of its members though the shares are held in trust for them…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.4% of users find it useful
Company Law and director incapacity
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Company Law and director incapacity"

Download file to see previous pages There is no magic formula utilized by the courts in determining whether to pierce the corporate veil or not.
In our present case, the directors of W&H Ltd namely Jean, Lynette, Lauren and Ryan own a quarter of the company's issued shares each. This company's main activity is providing management services to other organisations. Three of the four directors were not satisfied with the profitability index of the company and they attributed this to the incapacity of the other director. During the course of rendering management services to a foreign company, these three directors decided to form a new company. Accordingly, Jean, Lynette and Lauren formed the new company, LJM Ltd in which they were the directors as well as the shareholders. The LJM Ltd was incorporated. W&H Ltd had the entire infrastructure such as training facilities and equipment to fulfil the prospective contract. In a board meeting of W&H Ltd, it was resolved that W&H Ltd would sell its assets and stock to LJM Ltd at less than the market value. Subsequently, W&H Ltd became insolvent and the liquidation process was initiated.
The Companies' Act 1985 and the Insolvency Act of 1986 has laid down certain provisions for considering the fiduciary duties and responsibilities of Directors and the circumstances under which the courts will pierce the veil of the incorporation.
An incorporated company is a legal person or entity and the assets and liabilities of the company are not that of its shareholders or directors and the acts of the members are not the acts of the company. This fundamental principle is established in the case of Salomon v Salomon & Co1. In this case, Salomon a leather merchant formed a company in which his wife and five children were the shareholders with each of them owning a share and the remaining shares were held by him. According to the Companies Act of that time, the minimum shareholders required to form a company were seven. After incorporating the company his liability had become limited. Subsequently the company went into liquidation.
The court of Appeal held that the shareholding was not bonafide but contrived to favour Salomon. However, the House of Lords reversed this decision and held that Salomon was liable only to a limited extent and Lord Mc Naghten elaborated that the company and its promoters are different. Further, a company cannot be described as an agent of its shareholders providing clear evidence that the company is acting as an agent of its shareholders in a particular transaction. The property of a company does not belong to its shareholders. From this, it can be concluded that a company has a separate legal existence from its members and directors.


Corporate veil implies that the incorporation of a company raises a separate legal liability in the company, which is different from that of its directors and shareholders. From this, it is evident that the creditors cannot recover the debt from the directors directly because they cannot pierce the corporate veil. The application of the Salomon principle has mostly beneficial effects for ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Company Law and director incapacity Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words”, n.d.)
Company Law and director incapacity Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1531353-company-law-and-director-incapacity
(Company Law and Director Incapacity Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 Words)
Company Law and Director Incapacity Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1531353-company-law-and-director-incapacity.
“Company Law and Director Incapacity Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1531353-company-law-and-director-incapacity.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Company Law and director incapacity

Company Law

...? Company law has been an interesting matter of study since decades. In the company law a variety of difference exists between the liability of the directors or the employees and thus they are convicted based on certain situation. The paper studies two different cases and helps to analyze the difference between the judgments provided based on the variability of the situation. It also underlines the fact that the courts held matter of fraud in a serious manner. Williams Vs. Natural Life Health Foods Ltd The case of William vs. Natural Life Health foods limited is an important element of study in the company law and the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Company law

...? Topic (Company Law) A company acquires its legal personality after registration under the companies Act. Through incorporation, a company becomes a legal entity separate and distinct from its members who are the shareholders. Registration of a company involves delivery of memorandum of association, article of association, declaration by promoters of their intention of being formed into a company and list of directors to the registrar of companies as entailed in the companies Act. The company registration constitutes it “a body corporate.” It becomes a...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Company law

...? Company Law No: Company Law Question No Advise Leaping Lizard Coffee Emporium Pty Ltd on whether the company will have to honor the contract for $25,000 that has not been approved and signed by the managing director. Corporations Act 2001 The Corporations Act 2001 in fact an act of Commonwealth of Australia that deals with the business entities of Australia from federating level to inter state level. It mainly focuses on companies besides other entities like partnerships / managed investment schemes1. The Corporations Act is an important legislation passed by the legislators that governs the companies...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Company Law

...?The factual scenario raises various issues in company law relating to the legality of proposed transactions and directors duties. With regard to theproposed transactions and dissatisfaction of Ergan, Arif and Moshe as minority shareholders in the actions of Pedro and Morgan; this initially raises issues of breach of directors’ duties under the Companies Act 2006. Section 171 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA) provides that “a director of a company must- a) act in accordance with the company’s constitution, and b) only exercise powers for the purposes for which they are conferred” (CA)....
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

COMPANY LAW

...Court of Western Australia held that s440C of the Corporations Act protects receivers from conversion claims by the owner of goods subject to retention of title where the company is under administration at the time. What this indicates is that if Black Books has been placed under the receivership owing to the actions of the other two creditors—Supplier and Pressing—it is impossible for Black Books to refuse 8 ceding the ownership of the land to Lender. This is completely against the law. However, if there is a clause in the debenture or contractual agreement which claims that Black Books could offset its debt to Lender through alternative payment and not ceding the landed property, then Lender could ask...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Company Law - English law

.... In that case a franchise company had already gone into liquidation by the time a misrepresentation was discovered. The plaintiff sought redress directly from the sole director of the former franchise company. Their Lordships held not only that the corporate veil was sacrosanct and should only be lifted in the most exceptional circumstances but that there was insufficient evidence that the plaintiff had relied on anything the director had said on behalf of the franchise company to justify making him personally liable. It is submitted that the rationale behind this stricter application of Salomon seems to be that in the cases mentioned the...
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study

Company Law, Business Law

...May 23, 2006 Academia Research Topic: Exam questions for Business Law (Company Law Adam owns 11% of the shares in a medium-sized company, andthat company owns a chain of fast food outlets around Wales. Apparently, the board of directors has decided to implement two recent special resolutions to alter the articles of association. Additionally, Adam is uncomfortable with the decision of the board of directors because the board of directors no longer needs to obtain the approval of the shareholders for certain high-value transactions. Mostly, the majority rule usually prevails when voting over certain...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Company Director

...Topic: Company Law Style: APA Preferred language style: English (U.K Answer: Before attempt to discuss this question it need to say that Companies Act 2006 does not contain a specific definition of the term "director". However, there is a general provision in section 250 of CA 2006, which states that the expression "director" includes "any person occupying the position of director, by whatever name called", which includes a person who is treated by the board as such despite not having been validly appointed. The law also recognises the concept of shadow director, which is defined by section 251. In the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Director Management and Director Duties

...Actions Section 260: 19 Evidence of Research 23 Analysis of Law: 24 Conclusions: 26 Further Research Recommendations 27 Bibliography 29 Introduction The Companies Act has been in use for over a hundred and fifty years. This has been designed to provide companies with a framework within which companies with limited liability are required to work within. The Companies Act was replaced on 8th November 2006, which was updated, modernized and rewritten version of the company law. The changes in the act however are to be implemented in the number of different phases and this would end by October 2009. However before moving...
32 Pages(8000 words)Essay

Business Law (company law)

...government interventions are highly appreciated by business as such an opportunity allows a business to manage its affairs as best as deems fit. A limited liability company is free to create whichever organizational structure that is agreed upon by all the company owners. It can be managed by managers or the various members of the company. They are authorized to make major decisions affecting the company. This is in opposition to the requirement of a board of directors in order for decisions to be made. Generally, a limited liability company suffers very few restrictions in terms of ownership. The question of who can be an owner in...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic Company Law and director incapacity for FREE!

Contact Us