Nobody downloaded yet

Character Review from the Movie 12 Angry Men - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
James Svara shows us in the Ethics Triangle how we as managers, leaders, and ethical people can handle situations by applying key elements of principle, greatest good, and character around duty. In 12 Angry Men, the application of this method is put to the test - especially with juror 8, played by Henry Fonda, and his example shows us how we can utilize all three ethical approach methods.
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.7% of users find it useful
Character Review from the Movie 12 Angry Men
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Character Review from the Movie 12 Angry Men"

Download file to see previous pages Based on the knife, the inability to remember details of a movie, fighting with his father earlier in the evening, and eyewitnesses who saw him kill his father and leave the apartment, the young man should by all accounts sent to the electric chair.
However, in this case, one juror, number 8, doesn't believe the defense case was convincingly portrayed and while not necessarily believing the boy to be innocent, needs to understand the facts of the case, and cannot in good conscience vote to send this young man to die. He has reasonable doubt, and voices it by voting not guilty.
Juror 8, in 12 Angry Men, works from a place of virtue, principles, and good character at all times. By knowing his duty as a public servant, he does not allow idle chatter to distract him from the task, his selfish reasons to overpower, and he comes from a place of fairness and equality. Even when presented with the facts of the trial, his intuition continues to question what is right and wrong and stands by his principles. Using the virtuous approach to ethics, he listens to his inner voice, and listens to each fact once again in order to understand.
As they begin to speak about the case, a number of facts exposed as exaggerated or untrue reveal themselves. The first piece of evidence being a knife so special the shopkeeper has never seen one like it before. Not quite believing the knife to be one of a kind, and following his instincts cause him to break the law by going to the kid's neighborhood and buying a similar knife. Now a lawbreaker, we may think his credibility shattered; however, he informs the other jurors of his intention of a greater good, and choosing to do something wrong in order to obtain it.
In the Utilitarian approach, we see the consequence of the action is what determines right and wrong not the act itself. Was the result a good consequence for all and justifiable to produce the equality for all If so, then it was the right course of action. However, if Juror 8 continued to break the law in order to prove his point, the balance of ethics tipped, and the ends would not justify the means.
An eighteen-year-old kid whose father beats him daily should be a prime suspect in the father's murder; however, juror 8 does not believe he seems like the type. Placing himself in the kid's shoes, juror eight tries to feel what the kid feels, and advocates why each fact does not convince him. Principled actions of compassion and empathy are universal and good by themselves. As a good leader would, juror 8 requests each person put themselves in the shoes of the accused - by posing questions and making it personal.
"It's possible" is a favorite phrase of juror 8, and recommending another vantage point to each "fact", he shows each man a human side of things. He asks them if they have ever lived near an "L" train, if they have ever said they would kill someone without meaning it, and not remembered details of a day.
Again, if the balance tipped to the principle side of ethics, analysis of each act and consequence would cause us to not move toward a resolution or ask entirely too many questions in order to understand.
Eleven jurors believe themselves to be good-hearted people who are there to perform a duty. Good people do not necessarily make good decisions as mentioned in the reading. Juror 8 asks them to look at the consequences of their own actions - voting to send a kid to die ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Character Review from the Movie 12 Angry Men Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Character Review from the Movie 12 Angry Men Essay)
“Character Review from the Movie 12 Angry Men Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Character Review from the Movie 12 Angry Men

12 angry men film analysis

...12 Angry Men Order ID – 853036 Introduction The movie12 Angry Men” (1957) by Brian Rathjen, deals with a case of capital murder involving a youth of Spanish- American dissent. The chief premise of this movie is to prove his guilt or innocence in front of a deliberating jury. This mini drama comprises of the prejudices and misconceptions of the jury in trying to arrive at the proper solution in the trial of first degree murder. The accused is a Hispanic - Latino, 18 years of age and the crime is the killing of his father by stabbing. 1. Leadership: Describe the different approaches to leadership...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

12 Angry Men

..., indifference, unreliable judgments, personal vendettas and more in his films, most of the above appearing in this first of a long line of impactful filmmaking, always presented in a way that proves entertaining in a fascinating way. In describing this hard to define element, Lumet says “Good style, to me, is unseen style. It is style that is felt.”5 His approach to making “12 Angry Men” was coming from his previous experience of working with live television. This helped prompt his predilection for shooting the entire movie in a single location as well as for the speed with which he had it filmed. To help bring out the intense social issues he wished to cover, Lumet...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

12 angry men movie

... 16 Feb. 2008 12 Angry Men The film “12 Angry Men” is a critically acclaimed film directed by first time director Sidney Lumet and released in the year 1957. The film is about the court trial of an 18 year old Spanish-American boy who is accused of murdering his father. A jury consisting of 12 men is assigned the job of looking into the case. It is the duty of the jury to come up with a unanimous decision whether to acquit or convict the Hispanic. The movie is famous for the use of a single set. The entire movie was filmed in a single jury room with the exception of three minutes in the washroom. The movie for nominated for three Oscars(Best Director, Best Picture and Best Writing, screenplay based on material from another medium... ) and...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

12 Angry Men - Movie Review

...12 Angry Men- Movie Review The Story-Background: 12 Angry men is a movie based on the trial of a teenaged South American boy accused of his father’s murder. The movie is set in the jury room where 12 men are to decide the fate of the boy based on the facts as provided before and their own deliberations. But there can be only two verdicts, and if they choose “guilty” the boy will go the electric chair for his death sentence. There is no choice of appeal. However, if they have reasonable doubt about the case they must acquit the boy of the murder charge. His life now lies in the hands of the 12 men who begin the deliberations almost convinced of his guilt but as it is later revealed their judgments are clouded by personal biases... and...
6 Pages(1500 words)Assignment

12 Angry Men (1957) -

...Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx 4 November 12 Angry Men The movie12 Angry Men’ is a ic example of how a person’s strong conviction can enter hearts of others and make them think with a different outlook. The movie begins with the judge asking the jury to retire in the other room and come up with a decision. Eleven out of twelve jury members are in staunch support of the accused being given capital punishment. But there is one person who has ‘reasonable doubts’ in his mind about the evidences and the witnesses. He decides to vote not guilty for the accused and starts to give the logic behind his...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

12 angry men

...12 Angry Men The movie12 Angry Men” is an archetypal courtroom movie featuring twelve jurors and a defendant, accused of murder. The movie depicts the jury as the core and integral part of the criminal justice system. In the movie, one of the jurors is of a dissenting opinion and passionately attempt to free the accused. He does this by successfully convincing the other 11 members of the jury to buy his idea of “burden of proof” concerning the evidence presented against the accused. The defendant is accused of having murdered his vicious father. When the case reaches...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

12 Angry Men

...Group process in the film “12 angry men” The jury deliberation in the film, “12 angry men” is a portrayal of group dynamics. Group dynamics relates to the functioning, structure and the roles individuals play in a group. The jury in the film, consisting of twelve men, was drawn together to determine whether the boy was culpable of killing his father. The characteristics of group dynamics applicable to this case include personality conflicts, the operation of the jurors’ minds and their joint effort in determining the truth. The movie represents an entire spectrum of humanity, from the coldly analytical...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

12 Angry men

...Intro The movie12 angry men” focuses on a jury’s deliberation of a capital Murder case. The jury in the case was torn in handing a unanimous guilty verdict to a boy who allegedly killed his father because that would mean an automatic death sentence. The sole dissenter, Juror 8 had successfully convinced the jury for a thorough discussion after a secret voting. The discussion took an interesting turn for a serious debate that provided several examples of constructive and destructive argument methods in the process. The discussion also identified many reasoning errors in the decision making of the jurors and this paper will provide ways how to overcome those errors with a concluding thoughts on how we can learn... judgment. When these...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

12 Angry Men (Movie)

...12 Angry Men (Film) Question Symbolic convergence theory Symbolic convergence theory explains the cohesive nature of social groups by sharing emotions, meanings and motives. The theory postulates that humans always want to understand an occurrence depending on the people involved their motivations, personality traits and agency of the occurrence. The same is the case in the film as the twelve jurors make their decision by systematically changing their belief on the guilt of the defender. Eleven of them decide that the boy is guilty without considering any of the evident effectively. They do so owing to the effects of discussion in the courtroom coupled with their individual prejudices...
5 Pages(1250 words)Movie Review

Movie Analysis: 12 Angry Men

...Movie Analysis: 12 Angry Men Affiliation: Introduction Evidence decision-making processes and organizational behavior is observed in the movie 12 Angry Men (1957). A recap on the film shows 12 men deciding the fate of an 18-year-old man accused of killing his father. These men, jurors, give their opinions and vote (guilty or not guilty) based on rational and irrational reasons. As observed within the movie, a variety of evidence-based analysis of the case lead to their decision as observed through the use of verbal and non-verbal communication cues. Movie Analysis Conflicts According to the movie, Juror # 10 is convinced that people from slum backgrounds "are liars and are wild and dangerous" (Lumet,1957). This portrays... the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Character Review from the Movie 12 Angry Men for FREE!

Contact Us