Nobody downloaded yet

There is no place in a modern constitution for prerogative powers. They have received no democratic seal of approval, Their amenability to judicial review is - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Can the President use "unconstitutional" authority in order to save the Constitution and constitutional democracy The answer should be understandable, but scholars and jurists have made the issue (and answer) more complex than it should be. Our saga about constitutional government refers to Ex parte Milligan, (1) Duncan v…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER99% of users find it useful
There is no place in a modern constitution for prerogative powers. They have received no democratic seal of approval, Their amenability to judicial review is
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "There is no place in a modern constitution for prerogative powers. They have received no democratic seal of approval, Their amenability to judicial review is"

Download file to see previous pages In other words, the Constitution does not operate usually in abnormal times, and both the existence of a "wartime" constitution and the potential for "constitutional dictatorship" follow from that relevant fact. In spite of sporadic rhetoric, in contrast to statutes and decisions, very little has really changed in two centuries from the way presidents have invariably acted during a dire emergency. In answering Lincoln's question, raised in 1861, constitutional democracy can be very strong to keep up its own existence without undermining the liberties of the people it has been formed to protect. But the nation's political leadership must be so liable and at the same time be willing to stick to constitutional constraints.
Saying that, let me now spell out the content and issues that follow for discussion: 1) the president must possess emergency powers capable of operating in abnormal times; 2) prerogative powers innately belong to the president in his capacity as political head of the nation and definitive guardian of the Constitution; 3) the Bush administration is making many of the same mistakes in its war on terror as the Johnson and Nixon administrations made with regard to the earlier Vietnam misadventure; 4) Congress, while salvaging its capacity to work out real legislative supervision over the presidential use of war powers in 1973-76, finds itself reluctant or unable to say no to the President since September 11, 2001; 5) legislation enacted since the terrorist attack in New York and anywhere else has engorged not only the President's ability to take the nation into war but has revolutionized the whole concept of separation of powers/checks and balances; and 6) emergency/prerogative power must be used in a terrible emergency only, and when the initial emergency situation comes to an end so should the unregulated use of outstanding presidential power.
In Federalist No. 23, Alexander Hamilton, writing about the idea of crisis government and the need for indeterminate power in the national government, announced that the war powers "should exist without restraint, because it is impossible to anticipate or define the degree and variety of national emergencies, and the correspondent extent and variety of the means which may be indispensable to please them." (4) The period of civil war permanently transformed our understanding of the war powers. Lincoln's imaginative combining of the commander-in-chief, take care, and executive power clauses into a notion of presidential war power independent of legislative authority--where ends justified means--laid to rest the earlier, limited meaning of commander-in-chief. Lincoln's assertion of this independent, virtually unlimited war power, held together by Locke's "prerogative" theory, (5) was legitimized and sanctioned by the Supreme Court within two years. (6) This transformation set the stage for the modern presidential office, applied the notion of constitutional dictatorship in the United States, and began the development of the "wartime" constitution.
Earlier in the development of the Republic, generally that period from Abraham Lincoln to Franklin Roosevelt, presidents would act illegally and then depend upon Congress to ratify their actions after the ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“There is no place in a modern constitution for prerogative powers Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1528872-there-is-no-place-in-a-modern-constitution-for-prerogative-powers-they-have-received-no-democratic-seal-of-approval-their-amenability-to-judicial-review-is
(There Is No Place in a Modern Constitution for Prerogative Powers Essay)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1528872-there-is-no-place-in-a-modern-constitution-for-prerogative-powers-they-have-received-no-democratic-seal-of-approval-their-amenability-to-judicial-review-is.
“There Is No Place in a Modern Constitution for Prerogative Powers Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1528872-there-is-no-place-in-a-modern-constitution-for-prerogative-powers-they-have-received-no-democratic-seal-of-approval-their-amenability-to-judicial-review-is.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF There is no place in a modern constitution for prerogative powers. They have received no democratic seal of approval, Their amenability to judicial review is

Judicial Review

...?JUDICIAL REVIEW According to Wolfe, “Judicial review is the series of checks and balances within a definite government can be seen most clearly by examining its approach to constitutional interpretation and its manner of exercising judicial review” (10). The traditional meaning of judicial review was illustrated in two instances. First is in Federalist No. 78 and second is in the case of Marbury Vs. Madison (5 U.S. 137). “Laws which are contrary to the Constitution are therefore void because the interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts (Federalist No. 78), because it is emphatically, the province and duty of the judicial government to say what the law is (Marbury Vs. Madison), and because... the...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Judicial Review

...are enforced.” Importance of judicial review What makes control of administrative functions and power very crucial? The increasing relevance and growth of judicial review is as a result of the growth of the administrative functions and powers in the modern world and can be understood from a historical perspective. The period before 19th century was characterized by a societal mode of life known as laissez faire which connotes total individual freedom, contractual freedom, a free individual enterprise which diminish the government control and functions. In a laissez faire society the role of the state is negative and is...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Prerogative Powers in The Context of The UK Constitution

...Some of the public appointments are currently monitored by a Commissioner and guided as per the Nolan rules.12 The courts are allowed to review the legal right to use prerogative power in some cases; however, they cannot address all prerogative powers. Furthermore, the courts can assist civilians only after an incident takes place. Therefore, it is clear that between prerogative powers and statutory powers within the UK constitution, the former is more powerful, ceding the UK Cabinet Ministers a wide scope to exercise powers without...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Is judicial review consistent with democratic ideals

...of production which correspond to definite stage of development of their material productive forces. The sum total of these relations of production constitute the economic structure of society, real foundation, on which rise a legal and political superstructure, and to which correspond definite forms of social consciousness (Marx , 1999). From this extract we can deduce the primary features of this theory. First, human beings have to engage in productive work to earn a livelihood or means of subsistence. In primitive societies, men lived by hunting and gathering thus did not need advanced tools to do their work. They get their subsistence from nature but as they got organized, they started farming thus...
9 Pages(2250 words)Term Paper

Authority Judicial Review Jurisdiction

...powers maybe described as, in many ways, public they are in no sense governmental." Applying the Aga Khan decision, it also necessarily follows that the decision of the IRA is not subject to judicial review because the IRA has no statutory or prerogative basis. One of its main functions - to adjudicate on complaints about breaches of a voluntary Code of Practice (worked out by a committee of station owners) - while arguably may be public, is not governmental. B. Andrew may have grounds for for judicial review against the IRA. In the judgment of Lord Diplock in Council of Civil-Service Unions v Minister for the Civil...
14 Pages(3500 words)Case Study

Judicial Review

.... In the case of Belmarsh33 which is also an important case for judicial review an over whelming majority of the House of Lords decided that the indefinite detention of foreigners, on the ground of terrorism suspicion was a breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. All these cases are a testament to the constitutional significance of Judicial Review. The Courts have used and will continue to use the vehicle of judicial review to stop the unruly executive from trampling the rights of citizens. An executive wary of the outcomes of its actions and accountable for any breach of the powers allocated to it will think twice before it takes any actions which violate the democratic ideals of the British Constitution. Conclusion... it is...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Constitutional and Judicial Review

...Constitutional and Judicial Review Introduction: The Human Rights Act of 1998 became a part of the domestic law of the United Kingdom on October 2, 2000 and in that process made the European Convention on Human Rights applicable in the United Kingdom. The Human Rights Act of 1998 thus makes it possible to raise issues relating to the European Convention on Human Rights in the courts across the United Kingdom. The affect of this is expected to nurture a culture of rights and responsibilities in the United Kingdom. It also has its consequences on the courts in the United Kingdom and the sovereignty of Parliament in the United Kingdom. Human Rights Act of 1998 and Parliamentary Sovereignty: The Human Rights Act of 1998 has led... can choose...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Judicial review

...PART A. The act of reviewing the decisions of the lower courts, tribunals and administrative bodies by the High Court is known as judicial review in English law. Some of the court orders are certiorari, which sets aside a decision; mandamus, which makes it imperative for a duty to be performed; prohibition, which orders that an action should not be undertaken as it is unauthorized; a declaration, which defines the legal rights or obligations or an injunction. In short, judicial review is that power of a court, which empowers it to scrutinize a law or an official act of a government agent which violates the fundamental principles of...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Administrative Law Judicial Review

...1998) requires judicial review to ensure that public authorities do not “act in a way which is incompatible with a Convention right4”. Furthermore, Doctor Yardley asserts that judicial review is “the ultimate safeguard for the ordinary citizen against unlawful action by …….the more powerful administration5”. In order to be amenable to judicial review, the relevant organisation must be a “public body6” and it is evident that the Council is a public body under the “source test7” under the first limb of eligibility. Moreover, the Council’s functions clearly fall within the second limb of eligibility is...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Judicial Review

...while carrying their duties and that means that in course doing their tasks, they must uphold the similar principles held by courts in judicial reviews is. On this basis, it has the full discretion to set aside the evidence set out in the initial stages and could even allow new evidence. In this regard, the independent Review ought to have heed to Claimant prayers for setting aside of evidence of witness P which formed the fulcrum of the ruling against the claimant. TIME LIMITS 54. The claimant urges this court that the application herein has not been filed in compliance with thePart 54 Rule 54 (5) of The Civil Procedure Rules and Practice Directions, 1998as read with...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic There is no place in a modern constitution for prerogative powers. They have received no democratic seal of approval, Their amenability to judicial review is for FREE!

Contact Us